1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Details Bulldozer Processor Architecture

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Aug 24, 2010.

  1. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,150 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    583
    Fwiw on Bulldozer being backward compatible, Tech Report is saying they "expect compatibility............although specifics about that are still murky."

    Notably though is that they confirmed that they are compatible with current C32 and G34 for the server side. Maybe that is why they think there might be a chance for AM3 compatibility?

    Your absolutely right but the real question is why? Not even the 6 core/12 thread Westmere chips fully use triple channel for high end desktop though it would be a great feature on server systems.

    Now some will say what about the gpu being moved on die. With the rumor of a maximum of ~400 SP being on a Llano some would argue that adding more channels would be beneficial here. Thing is more channels require more die room being reserved for that.

    Why not just support higher frequencies instead? Save die space for something else (or just take the space savings and the power you save too). If I'm not mistaken, dual channel with 1866mhz memory has higher bandwidth than the current Intel triple channel that is on the 9xx chips (obviously this is generally speaking).
     
  2. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,764 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    AMD's diagram is interesting, it shows TWO L3 cache(s) and a TWO NB's for a 4 module, 8 core Bulldozer CPU. What do you guys make of this? Can this be how we get the so called Quad-Channel Integrated Memory controller previously rumoured, in terms of 2 x Dual-Channel IMC's.:D

    Mark my words, if Bulldozer is indead based on a Quad-Channel interface, it's going to perform like a Bulldozer!!!!
     
  3. trickson

    trickson OH, I have such a headache

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,494 (1.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Planet Earth.
    I just hope they finally have the right stuff .
     
  4. JATownes

    JATownes

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,833 (0.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    442
    Location:
    Texas
    From what I understand this is correct. Looking for source...
    Edit:
    Source

    So if Magny cours is two dual channel IMCs it stands to reason that Bulldozer will implement the same tech.
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2010
  5. 1c3d0g

    1c3d0g

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    699 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Yawn. Let's see how this performs first, which is hopefully not as bad as Intel's craptastic Atoms... :(
     
  6. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,150 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    583
    Seeing as Bulldozer is said to work in G34 and C32 sockets, showing dual memory and northbridge controllers isn't surprising. I think it is the C32 which is the 2P format for AMD from which will be derived the 1P high end desktop Bulldozer.
     
  7. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,979 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,821
    i added the full slide deck from Hot Chips Conference to the first post
     
    Super XP, mastrdrver, Steevo and 6 others say thanks.
  8. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    All I want is for AMD to be able to compete on the high end desktop market again.
     
    wolf says thanks.
  9. Atom_Anti

    Atom_Anti New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    176 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Captiva Isaland, Florida USA
    From where is the information the northbridge is completely on the chip:eek:?

    All other sites not saying anything like that, but it will AM3 compatible:cool:!
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2010
  10. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,177 (2.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    ok ok ok AMD u going to do great CPU's but what about damn AMD mother boards chips any improve
     
  11. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,154 (7.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,680
    Whats wrong with the 890?
     
  12. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,933 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    475
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    New Boards will DX11
     
  13. inferKNOX

    inferKNOX

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    899 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Location:
    SouthERN Africa
    I think it's more a RAM-is-too-close-to-CPU issue, rather than a CPU HSF mounting issue.

    I'm against the idea of having quad channel.:eek:
    Needing 4 RAM sticks in order to get benefits of higher speed sucks when you think about 1 of them dying on you. At least if they could, if possible, make it such that it would have different modes where, if you have 2 sticks, it switches to dual channel, 3 sticks - triple channel, 4 sticks - quad channel.:rockout:

    EDIT:
    No doubt those chipsets will have PCIe 3.0, intergrated & USB 3.0 at the very least.
     
  14. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,933 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    475
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    Sabine: Mainstream mobile platform based on the Llano APU, which will see a quad-core Stars-based CPU and DirectX 11-class graphics processor tied together on the same piece of silicon, manufactured using 32 nm lithography. Sabine is expected to arrive in 2011.

    Brazos: Ultra low-power mobile platform based on the Ontario APU, which will see a dual-core Bobcat-based CPU and DirectX 11-class graphics processor tied together on the same piece of silicon. Brazos is expected to arrive in 2011, and will allow AMD to drive netbooks, along with form factors the company’s hardware hasn’t yet appeared in (possibly tablets).

    Scorpius: Enthusiast desktop platform based on AMD’s Zambezi processor and discrete graphics (AMD, of course, specifies an ATI GPU). The platform requires a quad-core CPU or higher, DDR3 memory, and a revised Socket AM3 interface. Availability is expected in 2011.

    Lynx: Mainstream desktop platform based on AMD’s Llano APU. It’ll feature up to four CPU cores, a single graphics core (integrated onto the APU, naturally), and DDR3 memory. Availability is expected in 2011.

    Components:

    Llano: This is going to be AMD’s first APU, combining a quad-core Stars-based CPU and DirectX 11-class GPU on a single piece of silicon. It’ll be manufactured using a 32 nm SOI process, support DDR3 memory, and include core-level power gating. Because there are brand new capabilities in play here, it should surprise no one that Llano will drop into a new socket interface. Availability is expected in 2011.

    Ontario: While the Llano APU absorbs much of AMD’s risk in shifting to 32 nm manufacturing (since it employs a familiar CPU microarchitecture and more mature manufacturing process), Ontario will be the first APU to employ AMD’s Bobcat CPU microarchitecture. Ontario is manufactured at 40 nm, armed with DirectX 11-class graphics, and expected in 2011.

    Zambezi: Per AMD, Zambezi will be the first desktop processor based on the company’s Bulldozer architecture. Featuring as many as eight cores, Zambezi-based offerings will incorporate as many as four processor “modules.” AMD plans to use 32 nm manufacturing, and early reports suggest Socket AM3 compatibility (along with DDR3 memory support). Zambezi is not an APU, but rather is meant to be paired with discrete graphics.

    Interlagos/Valencia: Respective code-names for AMD’s upcoming 16-core and eight-core Opteron processors, respectively, both based on the Bulldozer microarchitecture. Interlagos will drop into the existing G34 interface, while Valencia is C32-compatible. Both families will be manufactured using 32 nm SOI lithography, will support DDR3 (including load-reduced DIMMs and 1.25 V memory modules), and are expected in 2011.
     
  15. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,177 (2.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    can u compare it with X58
     
  16. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,933 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    475
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    I think with a matched processor you could
    the MSI 890FXA-GD70 AM3 comes to mind
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2010
  17. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,154 (7.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,680
    Apples to oranges. Nvidia will never let AMD/ATI run SLI native on a 890 or "990" chipset. If so then yeah.
     
  18. inferKNOX

    inferKNOX

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    899 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Location:
    SouthERN Africa
    corrected ;)
     
    jmcslob says thanks.
  19. Bloodcrazz New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    17 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2010
  20. nt300

    nt300

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    868 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Toronto, ON. Canada
    Rememb AMD is sort of new to the chipset family despite ATIs previous knowledge. 790FX was a start and good one. The 890FX was a better yes, and help gain AMD more experience. And now the upcoming 990FX or some may say the Bulldozer chipset should be what they've been leading to for years now and should be feature rich just like Intels high end chipsets.
     
  21. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,059 (4.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,223
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I dunno...personally, i find ExtremeTech not that "techie". They are a Ziff Davis pulication, no?

    I tend to trust BTA here. The way I look at it, the only way I see decent performance boost overall is with a new socket, so I won't ever use current boards with these upcoming chips...seems a waste of possible resources.


    AMD has said for a long time that Zambezi would be AM3+, not exactly the same as current AM3 socket. That suggests to me that because of seperate NB/memcontrollers, they can disable some functionality on these chips as needed(AMD's "Modular Design").

    Oh, and by the way, the August 24th article hosted on that site makes no mention of socket plans, except this:

     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2010
  22. jpierce55

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,335 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    91
    I have skepticism due to all the hype they put on the Phenom, a really sorry processor for the hype. I hope AMD pulls it off. I doubt it will be up to par with Intel, but maybe a little closer, and hopefully a bit cheaper. I hope my next cpu is an AMD.
     
  23. Bloodcrazz New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    17 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    amd were say this pre 890fx. why wouldnt then amd fit this new am3r2 socket on the 890?
    it says am3+ will work on older chips but new chips wont work on am3.
    890fx will be base for the scorpius like was planed all long most sites are saying this not just that one and people that were at hotchips.
    so he was misinformed
     
  24. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,059 (4.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,223
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    It's hard to judge how accurate any info from AMD is, at this point.

    AMD officials were hyping 3ghz Phenom chips. This never materialized. The set a precedent there...for lying about about future products (they WERE supposed to have a policy of not discussing future products, I thought)

    So, until we have retail products, I am skeptical of any of this info, and if they use 890FX for Zambezi, I definately won't be buying.



    What has me really curious is the motivation behind such details being released so early...why? 6 months way from any launch, in the least, and they are pimping products in the public domain? Seems fishy to me.
     
  25. Bloodcrazz New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    17 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/bulldozer-bobcat-hot-chips,2724-2.html
    Scorpius: Enthusiast desktop platform based on AMD’s Zambezi processor and discrete graphics (AMD, of course, specifies an ATI GPU). The platform requires a quad-core CPU or higher, DDR3 memory, and a revised Socket AM3 interface. Availability is expected in 2011.
    toms wrong 2
    lol everyone turn on panic rofl but panic was the only one that was right
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2010

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page