1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD FX 8150 Looks Core i7-980X and Core i7 2600K in the Eye: AMD Benchmarks

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 24, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,713 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,669
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    The bets are off, it looks like Intel is in for a price-performance shock with AMD's Bulldozer, after all. In the press deck of AMD FX Processor series leaked by DonanimHaber ahead of its launch, AMD claims huge performance leads over Intel. To sum it up, AMD claims that its AMD FX 8150 processor is looking Intel's Core i7-980X in the eye in game tests, even edging past it in some DirectX 11 titles.

    It is performing on par with the Core i7-2600K in several popular CPU benchmarks such as WinRAR 4, X.264 pass 2, Handbrake, 7Zip, POV Ray 3.7, ABBYY OCR, wPrime 32M, and Bibble 5.0. AMD FX 8150 is claimed to be genuinely benefiting from the FMA4 instruction set that Sandy Bridge lacks, in the OCL Performance Mandelbrot test, the FX 8150 outperforms the i7-2600K by as much as 70%. Lastly, the pricing of the FX 8150 is confirmed to be around the $250 mark. Given this, and the fact that the Core i7-2600K is priced about $70 higher, Intel is in for a price-performance shock.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: DonanimHaber
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2011
  2. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,848 (5.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,338
    But will it blend??
     
    yogurt_21, blibba and AlienIsGOD say thanks.
  3. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,713 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,669
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Yes, it will blend, its Blender rendering performance should be comparable to Core i7-990X.
     
  4. chrone

    chrone New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    11 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    planet earth
    it's about time! yay :D
     
  5. LifeOnMars

    LifeOnMars New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,566 (1.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    396
    Location:
    Kettering,Northants. UK
    Oh My....good news :) More benchmarks please!!
     
  6. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,848 (5.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,338
    still be interested in how it overclocks though. stock performance is nice and all, but were not in the habbit of not tickering here
     
  7. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,792 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,349
    If this is accurate.. Sweet times ahead.
     
  8. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,588 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    528
    Location:
    Australia
    Surprise!!!! :roll:
     
  9. naoan New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    304 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    62
    finally! or is it?

    btw, afaik there's no 990x and the slide says 980x.
     
  10. Cybrnook

    Cybrnook

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    716 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    144
    Location:
    C:\Kitteh
    Shabbadooo!!!!
     
  11. JrRacinFan

    JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ...

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    19,414 (6.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,483
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    If they want to boast numbers, show actual screenshots. Just a few slides does not have me beleiving this.
     
    freakshow, [H]@RD5TUFF and heky say thanks.
  12. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,046
    Read more carefully. Out of 8 multithreaded tests the higher clocked 8150 8 core wins in 2 against 2600k. And that's from AMD marketing. In gaming it is compared with 980X which is under 2600-2500 performance in 95% of the games out there, and it is just able to be on par.
    Cinebench is a joke, performance is worse than phenom 2 x6. 2600k has a score of 6,8 on stock speed. So look behind the marketing smoke.
     
    95Viper, Completely Bonkers and heky say thanks.
  13. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,792 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,349
    Considering it was talks about how it would never be able to reach 2600k in anything it's still good news, if true.
     
    LifeOnMars says thanks.
  14. DaJMasta

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2005
    Messages:
    479 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    38
    Location:
    Silver Spring, MD
    Looks like performance is good - let's hope power efficiency is at least in the neighborhood too.


    My question is why the hell does it show memory as 1/2 the price in the example build saying you save $800. Wouldn't it be more expensive if anything since the memory controller supports higher frequencies officially? Oh marketing...
     
  15. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,798 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,682
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Chart #1: FX-8150 has a natural clockspeed advantage and the 980X is an old architecture (Gulftown which is based on Bloomfield that is over two years old). Would have been more fair to leave the 980X out of it but, they did it for a reason (cherry picking).

    Chart #2: Why is everything normalized to 2500K? I'll tell you why, it makes little differences look bigger. Take with a leathal dose of salt.

    Chart #3: Fantastic! AMD processors work with instructions only their software uses. Kind of pointless.

    Chart #4: Comparing to the most expensive Intel platform (LGA1356) with the second most expensive CPU (980X) proves nothing that isn't already known (its expensive). If they had a case to argue, they'd be comparing it to the price of a Core i7 2600 system...

    To AMD: Give the FX-8150 to someone that isn't you to benchmark.
     
    95Viper, ensabrenoir and heky say thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,046
    I don't say it's bad news but I would not consider it to be good either. Expectations were very high. It seems that FX is having a fierce competitor in Phenom 2 X6. Would be interesting to have a clock per clock comparison between these 2.
     
    sttubs says thanks.
  17. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,792 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,349
    It also shows where 2600k is so I don't really know what you're talking about here.
     
  18. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,798 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,682
    Location:
    IA, USA
    They should have normalized it to the FX-8150 and/or given the actual numbers instead of percentages.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  19. naoan New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    304 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    62
    I may be missing something here, but I don't see any cinebench score on this news...
     
  20. mtosev

    mtosev New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,463 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    Location:
    Maribor, Slovenia
    internal amd tests aren't relevant.somebody else who isn't associated with the company should review the cpu:)
     
    RuskiSnajper and JrRacinFan say thanks.
  21. damric

    damric

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    374 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    96
  22. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,792 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,349
    The first thing wouldn't really matter as the results would still be the same, the second is obvious but that is probably above marketing slides. ^^
     
  23. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,046
    Look on the link posted to donanimhaber. There are more slides there.
     
    naoan says thanks.
  24. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,713 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,669
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Btw, price confirmation of $245 for the FX8150:

    [​IMG]

    I'm off for the evening.

    Argue to your heart's content, but please don't flame/get personal. Report comments you don't like. :)
     
    yogurt_21, NAVI_Z, H82LUZ73 and 2 others say thanks.
  25. Recus

    Recus

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    528 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    179
    shb- and mtosev say thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page