AMD FX 8150 Looks Core i7-980X and Core i7 2600K in the Eye: AMD Benchmarks

pantherx12 · Sep 25, 2011

Well isn't it like a 25% die increase for 80% of the performance ?

( something like that) Bound to save some pennies.

MikeMurphy · Sep 25, 2011

pantherx12 said:
Well isn't it like a 25% die increase for 80% of the performance ?

( something like that) Bound to save some pennies.

I recall reading that the Intel hyperthreading feature accounted for only 5% of the die. Impressive stuff.

I imagine AMD's implementation should be north of 5%.

jpierce55 · Sep 25, 2011

AhokZYashA said:
BD have 8 cores.
bleh...

you need more cores AMD? to compete with 4core SB?
fix your architecture and FAST

This is an argument I don't understand, that argument makes sense only in 3 possibilities. 1 possibility would be double the power consumption, yet BD's supposed power consumption will be no worse than SB. 2nd possibility would be mass heat, considering the world record run I doubt that is going to be a problem.

3rd would be the only realistic possibility, that the per core performance is not strong. We have many unknown factors there. Will software treat it like 8 cores, or 4? We know most software only uses 2 cores......

Swamp Monster · Sep 25, 2011

jpierce55 said:
3rd would be the only realistic possibility, that the per core performance is not strong. We have many unknown factors there. Will software treat it like 8 cores, or 4? We know most software only uses 2 cores......

Software will "see" 8 cores:
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/4f1778db-1460-465e-8136-e88852809258.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp2XGoL9JaI&feature=player_detailpage#t=61s

LAN_deRf_HA · Sep 25, 2011

Speaking of, could someone explain why HT does anything at all? How does segregating tasks increase performance? You'd think the effort expended doing so would waste power and give no benefit, yet it seems to benefit in some circumstances... though there's also some instances where it really is wasteful and the 2500k beats the 2600k, which is what I'd expect. Seriously couldn't they just give us more clock speed or better ipc if they took out hyperthreading? I know just disabling it tends to get you a higher OC. I'd imagine the gain would be better if it wasn't part the design from the get go.

Damn_Smooth · Sep 25, 2011

NC37 said:
Mac users.

But who here? And I guess it performs better than desktop chips in gaming? And that is why everyone here is gaming on a Mac? :rolleyes:

FordGT90Concept said:
Two Xeon 5310, in my server.

Exactly, server, what it was meant for and where you can get a 16 core Interlagos. :toast:

ensabrenoir said:
Wow they got u pretty worked up there....
isn't what inside a cpu what gives it its performance?

You're missing my point. Of course it's what is in the CPU that gives performance. It just doesn't matter how someone builds a chip to get that performance.

Mussels · Sep 25, 2011

LAN_deRf_HA said:
Speaking of, could someone explain why HT does anything at all? How does segregating tasks increase performance? You'd think the effort expended doing so would waste power and give no benefit, yet it seems to benefit in some circumstances... though there's also some instances where it really is wasteful and the 2500k beats the 2600k, which is what I'd expect. Seriously couldn't they just give us more clock speed or better ipc if they took out hyperthreading? I know just disabling it tends to get you a higher OC. I'd imagine the gain would be better if it wasn't part the design from the get go.

because processes arent magic, they have limitations. they have to wait until they're done before another process can begin. with HT, a process that is idling waiting on another process/ram/hard drive, whatever - while it waits, the processing power is shunted over to the HT thread, which then uses the hardware thats idling.

its really just more efficient multi tasking.

Jonap_1st · Sep 25, 2011

this thread will be endless.. :shadedshu

whoever b*tching about cores, threads, TDP, architectures, designs, and bla..bla..bla.. should remember the REAL cost..

its like comparing two cars, both have different approach. but in the end, these two cars have the same exact time when they reach the finish. the only things that make it different is the way you can make all the cost to use it goes as efficients as possible..

i'm not defending either AMD or Intel, both are awesome. but i will pick whoever side that can get along nicely with my pocket..

Inceptor · Sep 25, 2011

Goodman said:
4 cores 8 threads , 8 cores 8 threads where is the difference?

Beside i view Bulldozer FX8150 more like a 4 cores with 8 hardware threads then a real 8 cores CPU...

Exactly. It is not a 'true' 8 core, it's essentially hardware-hyperthreading as opposed to virtual hyperthreading. Eight cores grouped into 4 modules, each module sharing a floating point unit; 'integer cores'.
It's too early in the morning for me to remember the technical terms for it, but there it is.

Stop arguing semantics.

TheLaughingMan · Sep 25, 2011

Wow, you guys are still going....12 pages? And still on the core, module, thread thing.

There is no rigid, defined term for what is and is not a "core" when it comes to technology. Its a word and nothing more. It is mainly just used for categorization and distinguishing the difference between the architecture of a CPU and other components.

AMD's use of term 8 core is not just about the architecture. It is about marketing, general public limited technical understanding, legal deals with Intel to not use Hyper-Threading-like technology, etc. If the creates of the chip want to call the FX-8XXX series 8 core processors, that is what they are.

And if you ever wonder why they used the term "core" instead of cluster, node, processing zones, and 20 other terms that would fit, go try to explain to your mother why is not a "real" core and see how that turns out.

Swamp Monster · Sep 25, 2011

Inceptor said:
Exactly. It is not a 'true' 8 core, it's essentially hardware-hyperthreading as opposed to virtual hyperthreading. Eight cores grouped into 4 modules, each module sharing a floating point unit; 'integer cores'.
It's too early in the morning for me to remember the technical terms for it, but there it is.

Stop arguing semantics.

I agree. We can call it what we want, what matters is that there are 8 hardware threads, so when using multi threaded software there will be benefit even when CPU is heavily loaded - WIN!

TheMailMan78 · Sep 25, 2011

entropy13 said:
And Bulldozer was released more than 6 months ago?

Although Nvidia wasn't quick as well with the 400 and 500 series, the "time-delay" between their and AMD's respective "current-gens" aren't as far apart as Bulldozer is to Sandy Bridge.

And as an additional point, with AMD comparing the FX 8150 to the Core i7-980X would be akin to Nvidia comparing the GTX 480 to the HD 4870X2, which they didn't do, unless you considering "HD 5870" as corresponding to "HD 4870X2"...

lol well........if you wanna go down that road I got some bad news for ya. The Phenom architecture is almost 10 years old and look how well its scaled. Just NOW Sandy Bridge has made it truly inferior. Took almost ten years for Intel to beat AMD if I go by your logic. Again......lets keep this in perspective.

ensabrenoir · Sep 25, 2011

wheels on the bus go round & round

Until tpu d oes some benches this will never end. Till then everyone should realize we've been here Before. If bd is the truth, two days later intel will release a monster...again and the cycle continues until ivy bridge and pile driver. Then raindow bridge and atomic elbow :rolleyes:

TheMailMan78 · Sep 25, 2011

ensabrenoir said:
Until tpu d oes some benches this will never end. Till then everyone should realize we've been here Before. If bd is the truth, two days later intel will release a monster...again and the cycle continues until ivy bridge and pile driver. Then raindow bridge and atomic elbow

Be careful. Mods have already given out points for calling BS on people in this thread. Just a heads up.

entropy13 · Sep 25, 2011

TheMailMan78 said:
lol well........if you wanna go down that road I got some bad news for ya. The Phenom architecture is almost 10 years old and look how well its scaled. Just NOW Sandy Bridge has made it truly inferior. Took almost ten years for Intel to beat AMD if I go by your logic. Again......lets keep this in perspective.

What does anything you have just said have anything to do with anything that I have just said?

If I go by YOUR "logic", you're saying as if I'm saying that the "next-gen" only happens when there's a new architecture? So why didn't I say anything else about the GTX 400 and GTX 500 series then, as well as the HD 5000 and HD 6000 series?

What you just did is reinterpret my points and construe it into a perspective that would fit your own. And then you call it keeping things "in perspective"...

JATownes · Sep 25, 2011

TheLaughingMan said:
Wow, you guys are still going....12 pages? And still on the core, module, thread thing.

.....

And if you ever wonder why they used the term "core" instead of cluster, node, processing zones, and 20 other terms that would fit, go try to explain to your mother why is not a "real" core and see how that turns out.

Thank you very much for this comment. 12 pages on and still going strong with the back and forth.

I have a couple of simple questions for all, that go back to my post on page 7:

1.) How many "average" consumers use their rig for anything more than gaming/general usage...better yet, how many here at TPU use their rig for anything more that gaming/general usage/benching for epeen?

2.) Does anyone know of a game/general program that will bring an Athlon II/Core 2 quad with a decent video card to the point of slow motion video? If so, please PM me the prog/game because I have been searching for one to make my rig break a sweat, and still haven't found it.

I say this because, as much as I enjoy the back and forth commenting, both arguments are an exercise in futility. Until software/game developers start to give us something that will push hardware that is 2 generations old to it's limit, the power we are all purchasing with new SB/BD hardware is pointless to the general consumer, as they will concur that what ever processor they own is awesome and does everything they want with room to spare.

That being said...I hope the FX8150 benchies I get to run on October 12th will help my epeen grow to ENORMOUS SIZE!!!! 8=========}

Thanks for entertaining me for the last 36 hours or so. It has been an interesting read.

JATownes

Damn_Smooth · Sep 25, 2011

JATownes said:
Thank you very much for this comment. 12 pages on and still going strong with the back and forth.

I have a couple of simple questions for all, that go back to my post on page 7:

1.) How many "average" consumers use their rig for anything more than gaming/general usage...better yet, how many here at TPU use their rig for anything more that gaming/general usage/benching for epeen?

2.) Does anyone know of a game/general program that will bring an Athlon II/Core 2 quad with a decent video card to the point of slow motion video? If so, please PM me the prog/game because I have been searching for one to make my rig break a sweat, and still haven't found it.

I say this because, as much as I enjoy the back and forth commenting, both arguments are an exercise in futility. Until software/game developers start to give us something that will push hardware that is 2 generations old to it's limit, the power we are all purchasing with new SB/BD hardware is pointless to the general consumer, as they will concur that what ever processor they own is awesome and does everything they want with room to spare.

That being said...I hope the FX8150 benchies I get to run on October 12th will help my epeen grow to ENORMOUS SIZE!!!! 8=========}

Thanks for entertaining me for the last 36 hours or so. It has been an interesting read.

JATownes

Someone played the tardcard and we all must follow the rules.

TheLaughingMan · Sep 25, 2011

JATownes said:
1.) How many "average" consumers use their rig for anything more than gaming/general usage...better yet, how many here at TPU use their rig for anything more that gaming/general usage/benching for epeen?

2.) Does anyone know of a game/general program that will bring an Athlon II/Core 2 quad with a decent video card to the point of slow motion video?

JATownes

1) I benchmark for reviews, play games, video encoding, general use, and often have my system doing 4 or 5 CPU intensive tasks at once. I don't just run a virus scan. I run the virus scanner in tandem with Spybot, CCleaner, while watching a video on Netflix.

2) Assuming all settings on their highest with AA on at least 2x and AF on at least 8x and decent being say a 6850 or better, Crysis 2, Metro 2033, Shogun Total War 2, battlefield 3, and Rage off the top of my head.

repman244 · Sep 25, 2011

JATownes said:
Does anyone know of a game/general program that will bring an Athlon II/Core 2 quad with a decent video card to the point of slow motion video?

Rendering

Damn_Smooth · Sep 25, 2011

repman244 said:
Rendering

I didn't say that. :confused:

Edit: You fixed it.

repman244 · Sep 25, 2011

Damn_Smooth said:
I didn't say that.

Yea I know, sorry about that used the wrong post for quoting, fixed it now :ohwell:

JATownes · Sep 25, 2011

Rendering I can agree with, but for gaming/general usage...I find a Athlon II quad/C2Q is more than enough...and as far as 2x AA & 8x AF, wouldn't that be video card issues and CPU would have little to do with it? No matter what CPU you have, a limited video card is limited.

repman244 · Sep 25, 2011

JATownes said:
Rendering I can agree with, but for gaming/general usage...I find a 965 quad/C2Q is more than enough...and as far as 2x AA & 8x AF, wouldn't that be video card issues and CPU would have little to do with it? No matter what CPU you have, a limited video card is limited.

Yes I agree, that's why I said a few pages back that an FX-4170 should be a nice CPU for game (or maybe even the 6 "core" version) because of it's high clock and large L3 cache.

I don't 100% trust these benchmarks since it's from AMD so I'm still waiting for reviews...

Wile E · Sep 25, 2011

cdawall said:
NO, NOT all multithreaded apps are the same, SB will not be faster in the vast majority which cap out at 4 cores. It will not be faster in any of those same games, etc. You are also assuming multithreading is linear. It is not take cinebench a "normal HT-less" quad will often score 3.79X when multithreaded vs a single core. thats not 100% scaling just incase your math needs help.

Yeah, maybe 2 years ago. Gulftown changed that. The only multithreaded apps that don't max out all 12 of my threads these days are those that suffer a bottleneck somewhere else, like mpeg2/DVD encoding (it goes so fast, my hard drive setup is the bottleneck), or games.

I can't comment for sure on who will be overall faster in multithreading, BD vs SB, but if I was forced to bet, I'd put my money on Intel pulling ahead in most of them. I would also put my money on SB-E decimating everything. Of course, it will come at a large premium, but that doesn't much bother me.

TheMailMan78 said:
Honestly I don't get all this bickering. These are MARKETING SLIDES. You know meant to SELL SOMETHING?! These are not a biased review by a third party like TPU. These slides are by AMD. They are garbage. Why fight?

Second keep things in perspective. Most people do not run multi GPU setups. So what advantage will SB have over BD other then that? If even that?! Will your E-mail open in 3 nano seconds with Sandy rather then 4 nano seconds with BD? BD will give you 150 FPS in Bad Company 2 when Sandy will give you 200 FPS? I mean really? Most console games run at 30 FPS! Is Sandy faster? Who knows. Probably. But how much faster is really needed at this point and is worth the price? I mean in a real world scenario. Is it worth the extra money. I mean you guys are arguing over a Shelby Super Snake with a super charger vs a Shelby Super Snake without a super charger. WTF does it matter?! They are both SUPER SNAKES.

The amount of audio encoders and 3D animators are like .5% of the market. So for you I say buy the fastest. Get the super charger. For everyone else buy the cheapest. The regular old Super Snake with its pissy 500hp.

Its about perspective. Lets not lose it.

Faster = better, period. I don't believe in "good enough".

Damn_Smooth said:
They already have 16 core server CPU's. It's not like they can't easily translate that to desktop.

Exactly, therefore BD will never compete on the top end. I want some competition up here too, dammit.

btarunr said:
FX 8150 vs. i7-990X, FX 8150 performs well: Boohoo, 980X is slower than SB

Only in gaming, not in heavy multitasking/multithreading.

btarunr said:
{list][*]FX 8150 vs. i7-2600K (SB), FX 8150 performs well: Boohoo, that's an unfair 8 core vs. 4 core comparison
[/LIST]

Only in multitasking/multithreading, not gaming. The 2500k will preform on par with BD at a lower price point.

All in all, if true, this is not a big enough improvement for me to switch back to AMD.

de.das.dude · Sep 25, 2011

TheLaughingMan said:
1) I benchmark for reviews, play games, video encoding, general use, and often have my system doing 4 or 5 CPU intensive tasks at once. I don't just run a virus scan. I run the virus scanner in tandem with Spybot, CCleaner, while watching a video on Netflix.

2) Assuming all settings on their highest with AA on at least 2x and AF on at least 8x and decent being say a 6850 or better, Crysis 2, Metro 2033, Shogun Total War 2, battlefield 3, and Rage off the top of my head.

i can easily do them all with my x4 945.

in the end it was laggin because of FRAPS! its a son of a bitch. and my HDD is a 3yr old 80gb crap. the OS and the fraps are installed on the same. so when fraps was maxing out the write at 23MBps, os had very little to do

System Name	My pc
Processor	Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard	Asus Rog b450-f
Cooling	Cooler master 120mm aio
Memory	16gb ddr4 3200mhz
Video Card(s)	MSI Ventus 3x 3070
Storage	2tb intel nvme and 2tb generic ssd
Display(s)	Generic dell 1080p overclocked to 75hz
Case	Phanteks enthoo
Power Supply	650w of borderline fire hazard
Mouse	Some wierd Chinese vertical mouse
Keyboard	Generic mechanical keyboard
Software	Windows ten

Processor	e8200 3.93mhz@1.264v
Motherboard	P5E3 Pro
Cooling	Scythe Infinity
Memory	4gb of G.Skill Ripjaw 6-7-7-18@1404 and 1.62v
Video Card(s)	HIS 5770 v2 940/1275mhz stock volts
Storage	1TB Hitachi
Display(s)	Acer 22" Widescreen LCD
Case	Blue Cooler Master Centurion
Audio Device(s)	Onboard audio :(, and Klipsch 5.1 Pro Media's
Power Supply	650 Watt BFG
Software	Vista 64 Ultimate

System Name	Zen2600
Processor	Ryzen 2600
Motherboard	MSI B450-A Pro MAX
Cooling	Captain120EX
Memory	2x8 GB Patriot Viper Steel 360000 @3400MHz [18-19-19-39-80] DDR4
Video Card(s)	Sapphire RX5700XT Nitro+ @stock
Storage	WD Black 500GB NVME
Display(s)	LG 32GK850F
Case	NZXT H440 EnvyUS
Audio Device(s)	Custom HP AMP + Sennheiser HD380
Power Supply	Thermaltake Toughpower GF1 650w
Mouse	Logitech G502
Keyboard	ElE Game1
Software	Windows 10 Home 64-bit

System Name	Obelisc
Processor	i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling	H110
Memory	16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s)	GTX 780 Ti
Storage	850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case	T81
Audio Device(s)	X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply	EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software	Win10 64bit

System Name	Runs Smooth
Processor	FX 8350
Motherboard	Crosshair V Formula Z
Cooling	Corsair H110 with AeroCool Shark 140mm fans
Memory	16GB G-skill Trident X 1866 Cl. 8
Video Card(s)	HIS 7970 IceQ X² GHZ Edition
Storage	OCZ Vector 256GB SSD & 1Tb piece of crap
Display(s)	acer H243H
Case	NZXT Phantom 820 matte black
Audio Device(s)	Nada
Power Supply	NZXT Hale90 V2 850 watt
Software	Windows 7 Pro
Benchmark Scores	Lesbians are hot!!!

AMD FX 8150 Looks Core i7-980X and Core i7 2600K in the Eye: AMD Benchmarks

pantherx12

MikeMurphy

jpierce55

Swamp Monster

LAN_deRf_HA

Damn_Smooth

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator

Jonap_1st

Inceptor

TheLaughingMan

Swamp Monster

TheMailMan78

Big Member

ensabrenoir

TheMailMan78

Big Member

entropy13

JATownes

The Lurker

Damn_Smooth

TheLaughingMan

repman244

Damn_Smooth

repman244

JATownes

The Lurker

repman244

Wile E

Power User

de.das.dude

Pro Indian Modder

System Name	Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor	Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard	Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling	Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory	2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s)	Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage	2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s)	Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) \| Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) \| Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case	Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s)	Logitech G560 \| Corsair Void pro RGB \|Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply	Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse	Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard	Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD	Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software	Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores	Nyooom.

System Name	Old Damned Rigs!
Processor	AMD Phenom X4 9850 BE 2.5GHz
Motherboard	MSI K9A2-CF
Memory	2 x 2GB DDR2 PC8500
Video Card(s)	Nvidia Geforce 9800GT
Storage	Hitachi 250GB Sata-II
Display(s)	Chimnei 22" LCD Wide
Case	Powerlogic Modena GTX2500
Power Supply	Amacrox Warrior 400w
Software	Windows XP Professional SP3

System Name	Multipurpose desktop
Processor	AMD Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.75Ghz , NB @ 2.5
Motherboard	Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 (rev 1.0)
Cooling	Prolimatech Megahalems Rev. C, 2x120mm CM Blademaster
Memory	Corsair Vengeance LP (4x4GB) @1666Mhz 9-9-9-20-24 1T
Video Card(s)	ASUS Strix R7-370 4GB OC
Storage	2x WD Caviar Black 500GB Sata III in RAID 0
Display(s)	Acer S211HL 21.5" 1920x1080
Case	Cooler Master Centurion 534+, 3x 120mm CM Sickle Flow
Power Supply	Seasonic X650 Gold
Software	Windows 7 x64 Home Premium SP1

System Name	ODIN
Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard	Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
Cooling	Dark Rock 4
Memory	G Skill RipjawsV F4 3600 Mhz C16
Video Card(s)	MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ventus 3X OC LHR
Storage	Crucial 2 TB M.2 SSD :: WD Blue M.2 1TB SSD :: 1 TB WD Black VelociRaptor
Display(s)	Dell S2716DG 27" 144 Hz G-SYNC
Case	Fractal Meshify C
Audio Device(s)	Onboard Audio
Power Supply	Antec HCP 850 80+ Gold
Mouse	Corsair M65
Keyboard	Corsair K70 RGB Lux
Software	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores	I don't benchmark.

System Name	TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor	RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard	Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling	MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory	ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s)	MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage	256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s)	LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case	Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s)	Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply	Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse	SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard	Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software	Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores	Benching is for bitches.

System Name	The Stone that the Builders Refused / iJayo
Processor	R5 1600/ R7 3700X
Motherboard	Asrock AB350 Pro4 / Asus Rog Strix B450-F gaming
Cooling	Cryorig M9 / Noctua NH-D14
Memory	G skill 16 Gigs ddr4 / 16 gigs PNY ddr4
Video Card(s)	Nvdia GTX 660 / Nvidia RTX 2070 Super
Storage	120gig 840 evo, 120gig adata sp900 / 1tb Mushkin M.2 ssd 1 & 3 tb seagate hdd, 120 gig Hyper X ssd
Display(s)	42" Nec retail display monitor/ 34" Dell curved 165hz monitor
Case	Pink Enermax Ostrog / Phanteks Enthoo Evolv Tempered Glass edition
Audio Device(s)	Altec Lansing Expressionist Bass/ M-Audio monitors
Power Supply	Corsair450 / Be Quiet Dark Power Pro 650
Mouse	corsair vengence M65 / Zalman Knossos
Keyboard	corsair k95 / Roccat Vulcan 121
Software	Window 10 pro / Windows 10 pro
Benchmark Scores	meh... feel me on the battle field!

Processor	AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Motherboard	Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling	Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE
Memory	Kingston Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GBx2
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte Gaming OC AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 16GB
Storage	TEAMGROUP T-Force Z440 2TB, SPower A60 2TB, SPower A55 2TB, Seagate 4TBx2, Samsung 870 2TB
Display(s)	AOC 24G2 + Xitrix WFP-2415
Case	Montech Air X
Audio Device(s)	Realtek onboard
Power Supply	Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 FM 750W 80+ Gold
Mouse	Logitech G304
Keyboard	Redragon K557 KAIA RGB Mechanical Keyboard
Software	Windows 10

System Name	Mr. Reliable
Processor	Ryzen R9 5950x
Motherboard	MSI Meg X570s Ace Max
Cooling	D5 Pump, Singularity Top/Res, 2x360mm EK P rads, EK Magnitude/Alphacool Blocks
Memory	32Gb (4x8Gb) Corsair Dominator Platinum 3600Mhz @ 16/19/20/36 1.35v
Video Card(s)	MSI 3080ti with Alphacool Block
Storage	2 x Corsair Force MP400 1TB Nvme; 2 x T-Force Cardea Z340; 2 x Mushkin Reactor 1TB
Display(s)	Acer 32" Z321QU 2560x1440; LG 34GP83A-B 34" 3440x1440
Case	Lian Li PC-011 Dynamic XL; Synology DS218j w/ 2 x 2TB WD Red
Audio Device(s)	SteelSeries Arctis Pro+
Power Supply	EVGA SuperNova 850G3
Mouse	Razer Basilisk V2
Keyboard	Das Keyboard 6; Razer Orbweaver Chroma
Software	Windows 10 Pro

System Name	Desktop
Processor	Intel Xeon E5-1680v2
Motherboard	ASUS Sabertooth X79
Cooling	Intel AIO
Memory	8x4GB DDR3 1866MHz
Video Card(s)	EVGA GTX 970 SC
Storage	Crucial MX500 1TB + 2x WD RE 4TB HDD
Display(s)	HP ZR24w
Case	Fractal Define XL Black
Audio Device(s)	Schiit Modi Uber/Sony CDP-XA20ES/Pioneer CT-656>Sony TA-F630ESD>Sennheiser HD600
Power Supply	Corsair HX850
Mouse	Logitech G603
Keyboard	Logitech G613
Software	Windows 10 Pro x64

System Name	The ClusterF**k
Processor	980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling	MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory	3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s)	Evga GTX 580
Storage	Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s)	HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case	Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s)	Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply	ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software	Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4

System Name	Monke \| Work Thinkpad\| Old Monke
Processor	Ryzen 5600X \| Ryzen 5500U \| FX8320
Motherboard	ASRock B550 Extreme4 \| ? \| Asrock 990FX Extreme 4
Cooling	240mm Rad \| Not needed \| hyper 212 EVO
Memory	2x16GB DDR4 3600 Corsair RGB \| 16 GB DDR4 3600 \| 16GB DDR3 1600
Video Card(s)	Sapphire Pulse RX6700XT 12GB \| Vega 8 \| Sapphire Pulse RX580 8GB
Storage	Samsung 980 nvme (Primary) \| some samsung SSD
Display(s)	Dell 2723DS \| Some 14" 1080p 98%sRGB IPS \| Dell 2240L
Case	Ant Esports Tempered case \| Thinkpad \| Antec
Audio Device(s)	Logitech Z333 \| Jabra corpo stuff
Power Supply	Corsair RM750e \| not needed \| Corsair GS 600
Mouse	Logitech G400 \| nipple
Keyboard	Logitech G213 \| stock kb is awesome \| Logitech K230
VR HMD	;_;
Software	Windows 10 Professional x3
Benchmark Scores	There are no marks on my bench