• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

AMD FX-8370 (125W) at Crosshair V Formula (old one, no Z)

Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
406 (0.07/day)
Location
czech republic
System Name AMD forever, AMD overclocker
Processor Athlon 3000+ Venice, Athlon x2 4600+ EE Windsor,x4 955 BE@3.9GHz AIR, X4 965 BE, x4 970 BE, x6 1090T
Motherboard Asus C5F-Z, Asus C5F, Asus C4E, Asus C4F, Asus RIIIE, Asus R4E, Asus M5F, Asus M6F, Asus M7H,
Cooling Corsair H100, Swiftech H220, CM Hyper 212, Xigmatek 1283 DK+Ultra Kaze, CM V6GT, Noctua NHD14
Memory Kingston Hyper X, 1600 A-Data 2000x, Corsair Dominator GT 2000 MHz, GSkill TridentX 2400MHz, HyperX
Video Card(s) HD3870 512MB GDDR4, HD5770 1024MB GDDR5, ATI HD4870, HD 6870 GDDR5, HD 7870,Radeon R9-270X
Storage 2x 320GB WD+Samsung, 1x 500 GB Samsung, SSD X-25, SSD HyperX, SSD Seagate, SSD Corsair GT
Display(s) BenQ 24" 24XL
Case HAF 922, Aspire X-Cruiser, benchtable Wroom
Power Supply Seasonic 500W and Seasonic 650W, Corsair AX 1200W, Zalman Goldrock 750, Galaxy OC edition 1200W
Software x64 win 7 and x86 Win XP SP3
Benchmark Scores you rather I do not want to see .. :-D !!!Thuban coming soon, new secret Gigabyte mobo too !!!
So. there are few results with allinone cooler. The difference between this FX-8370 and 8370E from another thread is around extra 50 MHz for my FX-8370E in hard benchmarks. For validation is FX-8370E better more than 150 MHz! For light benchamrks it could be +50-70 MHz. But with FX-8370E I was not focused so much for maximum of SUperpi as in this case... What about CPUNB? Again, 8370E seems a bit better, for the same frequency I need more voltage at FX-8370. For 2700+ MHz with 8370E it was around 1.25V, here 1.3 V.

Now some banchmarks.

low voltage max Cinebench



HWBOT PRIME


Cinebench R10


Cinebench R11.5


Cinebench R11.5+high CPUNB


Cinebench R15


Superpi1M under 14s


Superpi 32M at 5400 MHz


max validation process:
 
if its not prime stable then its not a overclock
 
Atleast he takes time out of his day to review these parts
 
if its not prime stable then its not a overclock
I dont agree. Overlcocking is hobby. It has different ways.
One part is stable OC for daily OC. Nobody can define what is exactly stable. Its 30min OCCT, its 15 rounds in LINX AVX, its 10h of PRIME, its one day of AMD Core Damage (this program is not for public) ? From my point of view Stable OC is situation, when PC of any user has no symptoms of instability in everything what the user doing with your PC system. For someone games, for someone net and lightgames, for someone BOINC etc etc...

Second part is stability for benchmarks. Every benchmark has different stability. Example X264, Cinebenchs, wprime 1024M are the hardest. 3D Marks, hwbot prime are normal, Superpi, PiFast are light loaded.

Third part is OC as hobby. OC for best results. About it is example www.hwbot.org There is few league, novice, rockie, extreme, profi. With LN2 you have never stability, but it is fun and I wanna go higher for records.
 
Not really surprising that the E is better binned. I'd have expected them to do that considering that they need to fit within a lower TDP.
 
My old rig could be stable as heck in prime super pi ocd etc but when in cod4 it would crash and other games pushed too far- i could never figure out how to get the AXP-M 2500 beyond 2.2GHz (200×11)
 
Yeah, I had a similar experience with my E7200. Was 20hr p95 stable, but it crashed after ~1hr of my brother playing war thunder.
 
Back
Top