1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD FX Processor Prices Lower Than Expected

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 21, 2011.

?

These latest prices...

  1. ...are worrying, perhaps AMD is falling behind in performance

    48 vote(s)
    42.9%
  2. ...are encouraging, perhaps Sandy Bridge is in for a cost-performance shock a là Radeon HD 4000 to G

    64 vote(s)
    57.1%
  1. purefun65

    purefun65 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    yes this is correct. amd I believe learned that lesson the hard way. They seem to be sensible as to price. Lets hope that performance is respectable to intel.
  2. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,425 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    872
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    And AthlonXP (Palomino/Thoroughbred/Barton) and before that Athlon K7 (Thunderbird) wrecking Pentium 3 and 4...
  3. purefun65

    purefun65 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    proud owner of amd for my gaming rigs until conroe. I could no longer use amd as my gaming rig after conroe. Daily driver or budget builds I use amd. Gaming rig I need my fps.
  4. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,739 (2.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,044
    Too little too late. Too cheap to compete with the 2600. We'll have to see how these work against 2400, 2500 in games as in multithreading they might do better. The only strong point I see is that the FX will be unlocked and it seems that they oveclock well. I really feel sorry for all those who waited for the next big thing. Maybe next year.
  5. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,315 (6.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,342
    Location:
    IA, USA
    It doesn't matter how you look at it, this is bad for AMD. This new generation of processors is likely to only be marginally faster than the outgoing generation--despite the higher clockspeeds. AMD wouldn't be practically giving them away if they were competitive with Intel products.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. purefun65

    purefun65 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    we wont know that until benchmarks. I believe it wont do well in games until the processor matures. We might be surprised. Leaked benches real or fake are disheartening! I am a gamer and I need moar power in fps games.
  7. purefun65

    purefun65 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    we would like them to do well. This statement seems on the surface to be correct.
  8. mav2000

    mav2000 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    451 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    Looks like performance is not going to be all that great....and I am an AMD fanboy..but if they are priced this low, there is something wrong.
  9. H82LUZ73

    H82LUZ73

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,780 (0.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    265
    Location:
    Cobourg,Ontario
    Also Intel is supposed to release SB 2700k In Oct-Nov right.

    Intel Users :toast:

    Amd Users :banghead:
  10. ivicagmc

    ivicagmc

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    176 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    If AMD does bad, we all lose... Intel users should :toast: to AMD if it does well, because that means competition and lower prices for all...
  11. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,315 (6.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,342
    Location:
    IA, USA
    My guess is that they're having a major leakage problem again (just like they did with Phenom). In other words, Bulldozer isn't going to shine until it gets a die shrink (just like Phenom II). It is sad but knowing the history, it seems likely. AMD has had bad luck with fabs. 90 was good, 65 was bad, 45 was good, 32...
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. SlayerJC

    SlayerJC New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    39 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Radeon 4x00 Series was cheaper than GTX 2x0 and not so far in performance. Lets hope for the best.
  13. jaspreetsinghbabbra New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    gonna buy them as they come in the market..........!!!!!!!!
  14. purefun65

    purefun65 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    I am in agreement. This seems to becoming a pattern. One can speculate as to not having a strong ceo and as of until lately any ceo as lack of dare I say mismanagement. I believe amd has some great engineers.
  15. robal

    robal

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Messages:
    485 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    By now it's pretty obvious that BD is not a top performer.
    I'm still going to get it from my 990FX mobo though.

    Because that's what AMD is for: good performance for price.
    de.das.dude, Rowsol, mdm-adph and 2 others say thanks.
  16. purefun65

    purefun65 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    amd despite not being a top performer in all segments. Has some good performance for the money. Im curious to see how interlagos performs. I would like to see some numbers. Cray likes them. I feel the need to remind people that this architecture is not desktop based. :) I believe with node shrinks and some tweaks it will be competitive in desktop.
  17. Fx

    Fx

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    497 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I dont know what kind of FPS you are trying to achieve but I game with high settings in all of my games with my XFX 5870 1GB and X4 955 setup. FX is only going to be an improvement and besides, FPS is vastly GPU-dependent
    mdm-adph says thanks.
  18. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,124 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    Except all those pesky CPU-heavy games like L4D, SC2, The BF-Series, GTAIV, etc. Those see rather large improvements in performance when gaming. You're also not considering that the entire PC Experience is affected by a better/more efficient CPU.
  19. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,154 (5.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,958
    Location:
    Home
    I am worried that the 2500K will remain as gamers favourite,even with AMD discount it looks like the 6core/3module of Bulldozer can only equal the 4 cores of 2500K. Which means each Bulldozer "core" is still weaker than each Sandy Bridge's.
  20. purefun65

    purefun65 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    not in all games. a strong 4 core is becoming the norm. going to an i7 920 was a big improvement especially in minimum fps games. 1920x1200
    first game game i realized i needed a a 4 core with a high ipc was supreme commander. That was how many years back? I think 2007. amd 4 core with 500 units was very unplayable.
  21. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,124 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    :confused:

    I kind of expected that from the get-go. I never understood exactly why people compared the Core Count on SB\Intel CPU's to the "Core" Count on Bulldozer CPU's. They are seperate Modules, but they still share a lot of resources so they don't have all of their own implying they are lacking in certain areas.

    The main selling point for me, is that even with matching performance, I'd rather have paid what I did in Feb\March and gotten my PC then, than wait with uncertainty for 6+ months to maybe get a better deal. I remember when Nvidia was marketing the 5xx series (I think), they were trying to compare it to the 5990, and AMD\ATi's only response was that their 5xxx series GPU was already in gamers PC's, so who cared if they offered similar performance over a year later... :laugh:
  22. lashton New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Messages:
    63 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Its way too immature to say that you are ionly speculating, the FAB process maybe sufficiently cheap enough
  23. lashton New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Messages:
    63 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    The BF games are definately NOT COPU intensive Im running BFBC on a really low end Phenom X2
  24. Sihastru

    Sihastru

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    354 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    67
    Location:
    You are here.
    That's AMD's fault for not calling them by their true name, "a processor with 4 modules and 8 threads" and not "a processor with 8 cores". They will fool a lot of people (average Joe types), so no worries for sales... the downside is "an 8 core AMD CPU struggling against a 4 core Intel CPU" backlash from the community starting next month.
  25. purefun65

    purefun65 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    you wont want to play bf3 on that cpu. you will be dissapointed. look the specs up and you need vista or better no xp. dx10 is the lowest it runs so if you have that cpu I will assume you wont meet minimum requirements for an enjoyable gaming experience. its frostbite 2.0. new engine revision for bf3.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page