1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD "Jaguar" Micro-architecture Takes the Fight to Atom with AVX, SSE4, Quad-Core

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Feb 19, 2013.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,616 (11.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,648
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    AMD hedged its low-power CPU bets on the "Bobcat" micro-architecture for the past two years now. Intel's Atom line of low-power chips caught up in power-efficiency, CPU performance, to an extant iGPU performance, and recent models even feature out-of-order execution. AMD unveiled its next-generation "Jaguar" low-power CPU micro-architecture for APUs in the 5W - 25W TDP range, targeting everything from tablets to entry-level notebooks, and nettops.

    At its presentation at the 60th ISSC 2013 conference, AMD detailed "Jaguar," revealing a few killer features that could restore the company's competitiveness in the low-power CPU segment. To begin with, APUs with CPU cores based on this micro-architecture will be built on TSMC's 28-nanometer HKMG process. Jaguar allows for up to four x86-64 cores. The four cores, unlike Bulldozer modules, are completely independent, and only share a 2 MB L2 cache.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    "Jaguar" x86-64 cores feature a 40-bit wide physical address (Bobcat features 36-bit), 16-byte/cycle load/store bandwidth, which is double that of Bobcat, a 128-bit wide FPU data-path, which again is double that of Bobcat, and about 50 percent bigger scheduler queues. The instruction set is where AMD is looking to rattle Atom. Not only does Jaguar feature out-of-order execution, but also ISA instruction sets found on mainstream CPUs, such as AVX (advanced vector extensions), SIMD instruction sets such as SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, and SSE4A, all of which are quite widely adopted by modern media applications. Also added is AES-NI, which accelerates AES data encryption. In the efficiency department, AMD claims to have improved its power-gating technology that completely cuts power to inactive cores, to conserve battery life.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    Aquinus, de.das.dude, Eagleye and 9 others say thanks.
  2. xvi

    xvi

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,994 (0.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,161
    Location:
    Washington, US
    I am SO glad to hear this.
     
    Chevalr1c and hellrazor say thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,527 (3.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,073
    Location:
    Mexico
    Hello new file server :)
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  4. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,408 (2.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    570
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    Sounds better then I expected on the feature support side, now I really am expecting x8 core version in an upcoming set top gameing fandangle
     
    5 Million points folded for TPU
  5. Ikaruga

    Ikaruga

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    870 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    Strange they do this before Sony's PS4 announcement tomorrow. Both new consoles from MS and Sony gonna have these new cores in their CPUs, I thought Sony would ask them for all the "flare" they can get. It's also strange only four cores allowed on the PC side while there will be more in the consoles (assuming that all the leaks are correct ofc).
     
  6. Filiprino New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2011
    Messages:
    77 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    I suffered the shitty mono core Intel Atom N450 with the microstutters. The first iteraton of Bobcat was already faster than the Intel Atoms, and you had a pair of cores, now with a quadcore and improved performance per core these things should go quick enough, and even better with all of the "higher end" features like AVX, SSE4, AES and alike.

    Sony and Microsoft made a good choice for their consoles (going with an octacore instead of a quadcore), and AMD made a good move.
    Sweet.
     
  7. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    Do these get HD 8000 IGP?
     
  8. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,408 (2.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    570
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    Good question not sure bit id expect them to and have an inclination to believe I read they had gcn in
     
    5 Million points folded for TPU
  9. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,352 (6.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,118
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    More cores in more places! Sounds good to me. This is how APUs started; I spy 28-nm CPUs APUs. :rockout:
     
  10. McSteel

    McSteel

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    577 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    278
    Wonder if it will go over 1.6 GHz, seeing how it's more efficient than the last generation, and uses 28nm process...
     
  11. PopcornMachine

    PopcornMachine

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Los Angeles/Orange County CA
    I'm sure AMD will clear that up by saying that later this year it will have an unspecified upgrade that may or may not be called 7000 or 8000 and will maybe be bigger or smaller than previous chips, in the southern islands or solar system family, which may or may not be the same things.
     
  12. Cataclysm_ZA

    Cataclysm_ZA New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Messages:
    21 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Jeffreys Bay, South Africa
    Holy moly. I'd like to play with that! Looking forward to the future reviews where this crushes Atom. I'm not sure if it'll help stop the onslaught of Intel's low-power Core architecture as they drop it under 10W, but Jaguar is certainly going to be useful in a lot of applications.
     
  13. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    [​IMG]
    Notice the "GCN" bit... obviously gonna end up named up as HD 8000 something... even tho it isn't known yet if it's GCN 1 or 2.


    Also, you might be interested in this:

    AMD Temash Prototype plays DiRT Showdown at 1080p ...


    To be honest, I'm surprised these slides/videos aren't more known of...
     
    Chevalr1c, timmyisme22, HD64G and 3 others say thanks.
  14. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,352 (6.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,118
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Atom: dual-core with hyper-threading.
    Jaguar: Real quad-core with real cores.

    We're not even talking modules. This is the real deal. So real they decided to keep using it. :p

    I dig that displayport hub at the end of that video. :rockout:
     
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2013
  15. happita

    happita

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,361 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    398
    It's about time. I was real close to getting a Bulldozer CPU when it dropped, but it flopped...so I didn't. I hope AMD gets it's head out of their ass soon. Whether it's in the desktop/laptop/tablet or whatever other area they seem to be in, a few steps in the right direction and it could slowly turn around for them.
     
  16. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,527 (3.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,073
    Location:
    Mexico
    *off topic* Anyone noticed that cpu-world finally updated their front page timeline? Ivy and FX shows up at last. Went to check on C-70's IGP.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. Jorge

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    741 (1.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    Nice Job AMD

    Nice to see AMD moving forward with another excellent product that should sell well. This is definitely a win for consumers as Jaguar has a lot of potential and widespread application. You can bet that the next round of desktop CPUs and APUs will have similar but imrpoved features.
     
  18. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,454 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,581
    I want to see a jaguar vs atom vs via showdown.
     
    Aquinus says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  19. Ikaruga

    Ikaruga

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    870 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    I would rather see jaguar vs avoton:)
     
  20. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,454 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,581
    avoton is atom. Best jaguar vs best atom vs best via.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  21. DannibusX

    DannibusX

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,528 (1.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    979
    Location:
    United States
    I wouldn't have named my product anything close to the Atari Jaguar.
     
  22. Ikaruga

    Ikaruga

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    870 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    I know it's part of the atom family, but that's the one Intel wants to "use" against Jaguar, and with 8 cores and 4MB cache, they will probably win again.
     
  23. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,454 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,581
    With 8 cores probably. 4 core vs 4 core vs 4 core then. I remember an older benchmark having via better than atom. I just wonder how it would be now.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  24. Apocalypsee

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Messages:
    111 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    I been eying on AMD Jaguar architecture since last year. Once any Windows 8 tablets comes out with any of these I will bought it in a heartbeat.
     
  25. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,616 (11.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,648
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    According to AMD, it will be clocked up to 1.80 GHz.
     
    Chevalr1c, de.das.dude and james888 say thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page