1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Launches Six-Core Istanbul Opteron Processor

Discussion in 'News' started by malware, Jun 1, 2009.

  1. malware New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,476 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    AMD today announced availability of the world’s first six-core server processor with Direct Connect Architecture for two-, four- and eight-socket servers. Six-Core AMD Opteron processors (code-named “Istanbul”) extend AMD’s commitment to offering server customers superior value at every price point with unmatched platform flexibility.
    Across a single platform, AMD can address the need for more cores and greater scalability with the new Six-Core AMD Opteron processor and offer a cost- and power-efficient solution with Quad-Core AMD Opteron processors. Systems based on Six-Core AMD Opteron processors are expected to be available beginning this month from leading OEMs including Cray, Dell, HP, IBM and Sun Microsystems, along with support from motherboard and infrastructure partners. HE, SE and EE versions of the Six-Core AMD Opteron processor are planned for the second half of 2009.

    • Six-Core AMD Opteron processors leverage existing platform infrastructure and a low-cost, power-efficient DDR-2 memory architecture which can help lower system acquisition costs;
    • HPC, virtualization and database workloads can benefit from increased 4P STREAM memory bandwidth of up to 60 percent enabled by HyperTransport technology HT Assist, which helps reduce processor to processor latency and traffic;
    • AMD Virtualization (AMD-V) technology and the AMD-P suite of power management features are available across all performance and power bands, ensuring no-compromise choice;
    • The new Six-Core AMD Opteron processor has up to 34 percent more performance-per-watt over the previous generation quad-core processors in the exact same platform. (AMD Opteron processor Model 2435 [SPECpower_ssj 2008 overall 1297 ssj_ops/watt, 501,246 ssj_ops at 287W @ 100% target load] compared to AMD Opteron processor Model 2382 [SPECpower_ssj 2008 overall 970 ssj_ops/watt,376,878 ssj_ops at 272W @ 100% target load])

    “Based on close collaboration with our customers, we believe there is a clear value shift changing the economics of the server market,” said Patrick Patla, vice president and general manager, Server and Workstation Business, AMD. “The new Six-Core AMD Opteron processor meets the increasing need for a combination of low total cost of ownership, superior performance-per-watt and scalability. Simply put, Six-Core AMD Opteron processors deliver top-line performance that’s bottom-line efficient.”

    Source: AMD
     
    Flyordie, WarEagleAU and ShadowFold say thanks.
  2. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,921 (6.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Let's see these go AM3, AMD! :respect: You know you want too!
     
    Flyordie and WarEagleAU say thanks.
  3. Lionheart

    Lionheart

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,051 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    808
    Location:
    Milky Way Galaxy
    wow, cant wait to see some benchies.
     
  4. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,743 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    194
    Location:
    US
  5. HolyCow02

    HolyCow02 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,638 (0.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    111
    Location:
    New York
    I remember seeing something about 6-core xeon's, but not sure if it was that they were released. I though it was just an announcement that they were coming soon. I could be completely wrong though :laugh:

    Anyways, good to see this stuff coming out. Though I feel like the amount of cores per die is gonna get obnoxious, and they are going to abandon creating new architectures. I hope I'm wrong :shadedshu
     
  6. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,418 (1.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    637
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    Need to read the whole thing,

    Dunnington uses an old school style bus system :)
     
  7. extrasalty

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    176 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    I can't wait for some 5 core chips:roll:
     
  8. Valdez

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    294 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Szekszárd, Hungary
  9. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,743 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    194
    Location:
    US
  10. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,393 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    560
    Location:
    AZ
    hmm I wonder how it performs. a cheaper six core in the server market would be welcome.
     
  11. Kitkat New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    768 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    77
    yeah thats prety impressive. Im sure thell get it lower too lol
     
  12. suraswami

    suraswami

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,163 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    822
    Location:
    Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
  13. Valdez

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    294 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Szekszárd, Hungary
    Yeah that's low, and it got a new stepping, D0.
     
  14. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    Real Men use Real cores

    only Intel does the sticky bubble gum thing. All AMD processors were true X core processors. So if they say it is a 6 core, it is 6 cores on a single die.
     
    suraswami says thanks.
  15. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,562 (6.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,501
    Location:
    IA, USA
    It doesn't matter. The difference between MCM and not can only be measured in a lab. AMD shot themselves in the foot with Phenom because they didn't do MCM. Intel dominated that market for over a year because AMD was advertising until they were blue in the face that MCM was inferior. If they did, everyone would die of laughter at AMD (crappy product + do it Intel's way).

    A hexacore is a hexacore is a hexacore.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. suraswami

    suraswami

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,163 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    822
    Location:
    Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
    Thanks I was just confirming it.
     
  17. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    Yes, sorta

    Actually, the MCM thing did exactly what was expected, it created a heat issue. This was the primary reason those old Pentium D's had a high TDW, larger cooler, and overheating issues. All of these issues were resolved with the Core 2 Duo....being on one die.

    But I will give you one thing, if it works well enough to not make people go, "WTF?" then do it. Granted it would save money to wait until the die shrinks to pull off core increases, which both AMD and Intel do now. That old sandwich trick will never be implemented again.
     
  18. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,562 (6.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,501
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Pentium 4/D = Netburst
    Core 2 = P6

    The Netburst architecture is what made it hot. You see the same thing in Core i7 (loaded stock temp can hit 85C on stock HSF) compared to Core 2 (never goes over 60C on stock HSF). It had absolutely nothing to do with MCM. If you double the number of cores, you usually see a 90% increase in power draw and thermal design requirements.

    Core 2 Quad is about 90% hotter than Core 2 Duo because it has twice the number of cores. MCM or not, that's what happens when you add more transistors.


    The "sandwich trick" is being used on Core i5 to add the integrated graphics chip. I do believe AMD is doing the same with Bulldozer. MCM, therefore, is likely to become more common than it was in the past.


    The thermal threshold is what prevents 100+ cores MCM chips from being released now. You'd need a whole room of cooling equipment dedicated to pulling heat off it and dissipating it. 45nm looks primed for up to 8 cores but we probably won't see much more than that until 32nm.
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2009
    Crunching for Team TPU
  19. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,443 (4.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,473
    actually its inaccurate, Core 2 Duo had a single Die where Core 2 Quad has 2.
     
  20. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,562 (6.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,501
    Location:
    IA, USA
    To clarify:

    Pentium 4 = not MCM
    Pentium D = MCM

    Core 2 Duo = not MCM
    Core 2 Quad = MCM

    Core i7 = not MCM
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  21. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    ....:shadedshu
     
  22. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,562 (6.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,501
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Come to think of it, it is actually easier to cool a MCM chip. Like on the Core 2 Quad, the two chips are pretty far apart:
    http://xtreview.com/images/core 2 Quad q9100 and Core 2 Extreme QX9300.jpg

    The heat is better distributed across the IHS (two smaller hotspots instead of one large one) and then the heatsink. It probably only results in 1-3C gain but, the more MCMs you have, the more it helps.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  23. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    To summarize: The methods of design do not matter. Only the end results and performance matters.
     
  24. wojo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    69 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    Omaha, Ne
  25. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,562 (6.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,501
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Yup, pretty much. MCM or not really doesn't make a major impact on performance at the end of the day.


    Those cores sound extremely simple almost like an SPE from a Cell processor. You're right on spyware too. Those processors might be part of a Chinese dragnet to control content. I see no other reason why China would see it as a worthy investment.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page