1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon HD 5870 PCI-Express Scaling

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Sep 16, 2009.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,965 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,769
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 28, 2009
  2. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,038 (6.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,102
    Very interesting. I wasn't surprised by the x8 performance, I expected next to no performance loss. However, the x4 performance was surprising, I expected a much bigger drop there, but 5% wouldn't even be noticeable.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  3. dir_d

    dir_d

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    848 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Manteca, Ca
    Gives me confidence in a P55 board with 2 5850s. 1 5850 now then when they drop in price after nvidia answers pick up another :D

    Edit.. Itchy trigger finger made me buy a 5870 lol
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2009
  4. AthlonX2

    AthlonX2 HyperVtX™

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,185 (2.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,668
    this review makes me more comfortable with my new build thanks w1zzard!
     
  5. RaPiDo987

    RaPiDo987 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    583 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    nice!!
     
  6. human_error

    human_error

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,749 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    484
    Wow i was expecting to see a bigger range between the different pci-e speeds - good info to know so thanks for the review w1zz :toast:
     
  7. A Cheese Danish

    A Cheese Danish

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,963 (1.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    413
    Location:
    your local vending machine
    Very nice! Definitely putting the 5870 x2 on my to get list. If/when they release it.
     
  8. Sihastru

    Sihastru

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    357 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    67
    Location:
    You are here.
    This means 2 x 58x0 CF setups are viable even on the old P45 motherboards (2 x 8x PCIe 2.0). I am very surprised about the 4x PCIe 2.0 performance... it's too good.
     
  9. stupido

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    151 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Belgium
    nice review...
    10x :)
     
  10. Tuvok New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    33 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    some assumptions are wrong, imho...
    if single card 8x 2.0 is 99% of 16x 2.0 you can't say the same for dual cards, since you got much more overhead in crossfire
     
  11. tzitzibp

    tzitzibp New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,225 (0.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    324
    Location:
    Larisa, Greece
    great stuff... thanks W1z!
     
  12. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    hey w1zz mind running 1x and 4x with an overclocked PCI-E bus speed of like 110?
     
  13. jagd

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2009
    Messages:
    457 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    89
    Location:
    TR
    This is insane ,how could you manage publish both tests same day ?Thanks ,anymore tests on the way ?
     
  14. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,965 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,769
    yes 5870 crossfire, we'd had that too but customs took the card and wanted to play crysis with it
     
  15. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,038 (6.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,102
    I assume the HD4870 corssfire review will be on the current testbed. I'm wondering if you could do a follow up review to this one, that shows crossfire PCI-E scaling, by taping off both cards and limitting them to x8, x4, and x1 speeds. It would give a good indication of how much more important the PCI-E bus is in multi-card setups. And really give a good indication of what people should expect when running two of these cards in a P55 or P45 board.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  16. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,713 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,669
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Yes, that's part of the CFX review. Both cards will be taped off at PCI-E 2.0 x8 for one set of scores across all tests.
     
  17. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    Interesting proof of concept! Nice to see some scientific reviews in the community. :toast:
     
  18. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,512 (2.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,143
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    Very cool way to do it without cutting up the card like that idiot did with a 7800gs! (yeah it was photoshopped but still...)
     
  19. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,038 (6.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,102
    Excellent! I can't wait for the review!
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  20. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,723 (2.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,459
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    W1z - you rock - what a great article with suprising results.
     
  21. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,260 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    967
    Extremely useful article and analysis. Thanks. This will make good reference material for the future.

    I was also surprised that you get 95% of the performance with x4 until I remembered that x4 v2.0 is the same as x8 v1.x...But good to know, and also good to know that the figures still hold true even on a top end i7 system.

    (And that dual CPU server boards with "just" x8 connectors will still make good workstations)

    ***

    Just to kick some dust, if an x4 is good enough (x8 v1.x) then so is AGP! Yes, PCIe is a better general scalable format, but, from a technical standpoint, AGP and it's x8 speed equivalence and lower latency would still be in the running if high end products were still available. This thought really surprised me!
     
  22. 5ilvgearX New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    8 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    :respect: :respect:

    Thank you for the awesome scaling review :rockout:
     
  23. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    As the people with Q6600's and 3850's on AGP getting 3dmark06 scores of 12000 have been able to prove. ;)
     
  24. e6600

    e6600 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    44 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    but whats to say a future dx 11 game will not be able to thrash the x8 pcie bandwidth?
    is it possible that at a now common res of 1920x1080, with some aa/16af applied, the next gen of games may prove p55 with electrical x8 pcie a bottleneck?
     
  25. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,260 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    967
    Remember what the AGP/PCIe interface is doing... transferring data. I think PCIex8 is going to be fine for a while.

    Then remember what kind of data it is transferring

    1./ textures
    2./ coordinates
    3./ calculated renderings

    So long as there is sufficient memory on the card, then textures are loaded once or pre-loaded.

    So long as the number of coordinates is a reasonable order of magnitude (hundreds of thousands, not hundreds of millions) then we are OK

    So long as the GPU does the graphics work, not the CPU, then this doesnt happen.

    So actually, the more memory on the GPU, the less bandwidth you need, because assets are preloaded and remain on the card.

    Why are x16 benchmarks better than x8 better than x4 etc, even if the difference is only small. I bet the MOST OF IT is actually uploading new textures etc. If we looked as the MODE distribution frames-per-second http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_(statistics) then I bet the results would be even closed. Remember that the "average" gets hit by just a few of the worst frames (loading new textures), whereas the "mode", the framerate 95% of the time, is probably the same.

    ***

    An analysis by w1z of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_(statistics) FPS would be extremely enlightening and would put the discussion to bed.
     
    Chewy says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page