1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon HD 7970 3072 MB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Dec 21, 2011.

  1. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,780 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    539
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    I agree with this to a certain extent. Take the HD 6970; it's quite similar to the HD 5870 but with the introduction to some minor design tweaks based on Southern Islands (HD 7970). AMD was forced to come out with a somewhat Hybrid design branching two completely different Generations (Evergreen + Southern Islands) together onto a 40nm process and naming it Northern Islands. This is all thanks to the failed 32nm process which the HD 7970 design should have been based on with AMD calling it the HD 6970 instead. And if 32nm did get released, today we would be talking about this 2nd Gen HD 7970 design rather than the 1st Gen IMO.
     
    w3b says thanks.
  2. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,774 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    826
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Great performance increase for AMD's card over AMD.... Not enough to probably compete with the GTX680/780 when it releases. I really hope AMD has a refresh to come out around the same time. While I love the 30K GPU score in vantage and the 40% increase on average (or so) if you take the same math and apply it to the GTX 580 right now.... this card will get stomped when Nvidia drops Kepler (Complete speculation just looking at history). Which sux... because I was hoping to see a much higher performance in crease for $550 bucks. Doesn't mean that this card for right now is still the new baddest boy on the block.... and I do plan to get two to play with for sure!
    Please don't take my opinion as complaining.... 40% or so is still a awesome increase! I just was wishing and hoping for something from the stars.

    Nice review Wizzard!
     
  3. ZoneDymo

    ZoneDymo

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    438 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    72
    Holy ffing shit this thing looks good :O
    Man, really makes the 6000 series look slow :(

    Also just saying but is it just me or does Batman AC look heavily Nvidia oriented?
     
  4. Kaotik New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Even though I've been using TPU as reference for card speeds for years, I'm taking current results with grain of salt - especially HD6000-series performance seems notably slower compared to what it should be, even when compared to HD5000-series (and 7970 performance seems to be a lower than on most sites, too)

    After the MSAA fiasco on Batman AA, is it a wonder? ;)
     
  5. AsRock

    AsRock TPU addict

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    11,223 (4.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,797
    Location:
    US
    Forget Batman, i want to know why Skyrim sucks with this card lol.
     
  6. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    Best of the bunch?

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,780 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    539
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    It makes sense why AMD priced the HD 7970 at $549. Mark my words, you won't be seeing price cuts from HD 6970's or HD 6950 because the HD 7970 is priced too high. This leaved the door open to making the HD 6900's sell very well for the Christmas Holiday Season.

    Anyhow I've had enough of being the early adopter, from now on I'll wait for modifications and driver fixes before buying new tech.
     
  8. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,038 (3.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,946
    3dmark11 1680x1050, same data as used for the review:

    [​IMG]

    anything wrong other than hd 5970 ? (which was running in single gpu mode it seems, rebenching that now)

    essentially the same numbers as in the hd 6790 review in may 2011: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HIS/HD_6790_IceQ_X_Turbo/23.html
     
  9. R_1

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    449 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    39
    Well, based on actual capacity of my 2TB HDD, compared to previous 360GB one, it should cost me $850. So at $85 it was a steal, "which is part of the reason prices for it never stabilized at that low a level".
     
  10. Kaotik New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    3DMark seems to be having the exact expected order (well, aside 6950 losing to 5870, but that's just one app so could be just app specific), it's just the average that doesn't make any sense, I simply don't see any way that 6870, which has always been faster, in the most recent review nearly 7%, could suddenly jump down to being nearly 4% slower than 5850, both being VLIW5 chips
     
  11. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    957 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    154
    Location:
    Australia
    Its funny, everyone is happy with the performance of the 7970 except people who have 580's lol.
     
    H82LUZ73, heky and badtaylorx say thanks.
  12. Grings

    Grings New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    187
    Location:
    Blighty
    Superb Review, the 3 games i am playing atm (Batman, BF3 and Skyrim) tested, AND my card in there for comparison (6950)

    I'm getting one, i wanted to see a review first before deciding on this or a 2nd 6950
     
  13. badtaylorx

    badtaylorx

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    487 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    153
    it's the same on other sites as well:pimp:
     
    buggalugs says thanks.
  14. Fluffmeister

    Fluffmeister

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    730 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    211
    Hehe that's probably because this gext gen, 28nm card doesn't offer much of a boost over the year old 580.

    I can see why the Cayman crowd are getting giddy though. :p
     
  15. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    It could be .5nm and that would do absolutely nothing as far as design goes. Good job bringing up a fact that makes zero difference towards performance though.
     
  16. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,292 (7.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,777
    4850 to 5850 :laugh: Thats what I was hoping for. But anymore its just not gonna happen.

    Also W1zz how did you test BF3?
     
  17. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,551 (11.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,824
    fantastic card, exactly what we expected from a new design.


    pity about the price, but thats one thing that WILL get better over time.


    the power efficiency really intruiges me, would like a graph on how that compares to SLI/crossfire setups that give similar performance.
     
  18. Grings

    Grings New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    187
    Location:
    Blighty
    I don't think the price is that bad, everybody seems to be comparing it to the cheapest 580 prices, which have dropped a fair bit since launch, as any product does once its been out a few months.

    Also, 3gb versions of the 580 cost a fair bit more than the price of a standard one most people are using for comparison.
     
    heky says thanks.
  19. ERazer

    ERazer

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,543 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    492
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    great reviewed once again almighty wiz :respect::respect::respect:

    true, guess ill hold on to my 580 for another year but cheers for the red team tho. i still consider my old 5870 one of best cards i had
     
    H82LUZ73 says thanks.
  20. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,270 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    230
    Making it hard for me to go green on my next build. Amd/ati = awesome gpus. People test with intel cpus &etc because amd dont have anything yet to make full use of its gpus potential.
     
  21. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,773 (1.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,069
    20% performance gain at the most common res. over the 6970 and GTX570 for 200$ + difference? Hmmm...
     
    w3b, qubit and dieterd say thanks.
  22. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    Sssshhhh or you will be burned at the stake as the rest of us stating the obvious.
     
    ensabrenoir says thanks.
  23. afw

    afw New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    642 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    127
    Great review ... Solid Card :rockout: ...
     
  24. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,838 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,022
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Am i only one who thinks MLAA should work faster on GCN ? I mean, MLAA is done through compute shaders, if they say GCN is faster, they should consider rewriting the algorithm for HD7000 series in order to better utilize it. Would give me a reason to reconsider HD7000 series card. though i doubt it since HD6950 serves me very well at the moment.
     
  25. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,292 (7.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,777
    See this is where I'm at. My 5850 still runs great and most everything on high. Maybe not the max settings but not far off. 550 bones just doesnt seem worth it in my case. I could get another 5850 for 100 bucks and run everything at maxed even with the crappy scaling of the 58xx series.
     
    w3b says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page