1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon HD 7970 3072 MB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Dec 21, 2011.

  1. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,138 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    580
    Hey Wizz, what monitor connections did you use for the multi display setup?

    I've read that when using two DP monitors that the clocks do no go up at all.

    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. theJesus

    theJesus

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,968 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    860
    Location:
    Ohio
    Then like I originally said, don't do anything. It sucks that there still isn't a solution that can truly handle eyefinity.
     
  3. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,739 (1.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,044
    What in hell was wrong with those? I mean nine? You kept going on and on?
     
    theJesus says thanks.
  4. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,935 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,059
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Ok, but you understand that you've categorically agreed wit hthe 7970 being useless, right?

    I mean, only multi-monitor users and 2560x1600 users need more than what I have already.


    So, to me, that's the compare I need, as high-end VGA solution user...I need to see, either dual 6990's, or 4x6950/6970, vs dual 7970's, in 5870x1080.

    Of course, Eyefinity users aren't that common, so barely any reviewers have the hardware for such a compare.

    This whole launch is completely useless to me.


    :laugh:


    No idea, dude. Most cards had bad ram. One had a coldbug at idle. XFX kept replacing cards, so clearly it wasn't anything I did, and now, I've put my 6950's in the same hardware that the 5870's were in, and don't have any issues, so clearly i got a whole bunch of bad cards, and that is all. but then again, I was pushing Eyefinity @ 5870x1080, and 2560x1600, so maybe that was jsut plain ol' too much for the cards.
     
  5. theJesus

    theJesus

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,968 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    860
    Location:
    Ohio
    I absolutely agree. Also, like Crap Daddy said, what was up with those 5870's? :laugh:
     
  6. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,739 (1.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,044
    NAVI_Z and cadaveca say thanks.
  7. magibeg

    magibeg

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,000 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    203
    I couldn't help myself here.... did you REALLY look at the reviews there he posted.

    http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...s/49646-amd-radeon-hd-7970-3gb-review-25.html

    There's the conclusion there:
    7970 average improvement vs the regular 580 is 24%.

    If you go through all the reviews the 580 3GB picks up a frame or 2 here or there but nothing significant. So going by hardware canucks numbers the 580 3gb would be merely 20% slower than 7970. I know you're obviously hurt but please don't lie.
     
  8. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,935 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,059
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Yeah, great, one card, usually less than 40 FPS average. Yippie. Still useless to me. I need dual 7970, vs dual 6990 or equivalent.



    :roll:


    This just tells me that AMD's marketing is still fail, new staff or not. Every reviewer should have been supplied with 3 monitors, a stand, and two or three 7970 VGAs. Rory Read needs to be fired, as clearly he is incapable of ensuring that his staff do their jobs properly.


    7970, yeah, it's nice, less power from the wall, more perforamnce. Great. But OMG, someone please put these things to good real-world use, and share the numbers!!!

    I'm now going back to clocking ram. Cheers. :laugh:
     
    H82LUZ73 and de.das.dude say thanks.
  9. sauron New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    9 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Georgia, Sakartvelo
    Why?
     
  10. Jeffredo

    Jeffredo

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    783 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    108
    Looks like a great card - very efficient for the performance - but damn these "soft launches". If the card isn't going to be available retail for three weeks, keep your mouth shut AMD. Whatever happened to the good old days when reviews and retail availability coincided?
     
  11. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,935 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,059
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Because I have TPU's 3960X and supporting boards, on the other side of the ocean.

    ;)

    S'alright?:laugh:

    Actually, honestly, to me, using X58 @ 3.8 is closer to replicating what the average user will get with a 7970, performance-wise. Probably half of 7970 buyers will be using something pre-SB/SB-E.

    Also, the review guide that was flaoting around before the launch used other paltforms, so it's intereting to see numbers from something AMD didn't use themselves. If all the reviews used the same hardware, there'd be no point to having more than a single review published, on one single site.
     
  12. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,825 (1.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
  13. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,540 (1.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    938
    Will it? Look at the 580. It's price hasn't budged since launch. The only reason I'm getting a 580 3Gb is because I found one new for $430 and that's all it's worth this far into it's life, but Nvidia and AMD would seem to disagree with that logic. The 7970 won't budge in price as long as the 580 doesn't budge in price. Neither have to move because their price is relative to their performance. Nvidia and AMD have been doing this at a distance price fixing since the 5xxx series. Why fight a price war when they can just slot cards in between.
     
  14. Jeffredo

    Jeffredo

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    783 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    108
    The GTX 580 dipped down the the low $400 range about a month ago for a short time. Its back up to $500+ now.
     
  15. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    844 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Location:
    Look behind you!!
    Well it looks like AMD got the 7xxx series right.

    Reckon they could get BullDozer fixed with a revision or is it to late?
     
  16. OrbitzXT

    OrbitzXT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,969 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    New York City
    I agree, I've owned both AMD and nVidia cards over the years and I'm not a fan boy, but the noise has turned me off to AMD for awhile now. The last card I owned was a 4870X2...and that got hot so I can understand the noise, but as you say the 7970 is efficient and shouldn't have this issue.
     
  17. human_error

    human_error

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,737 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    476
    Thanks for the great review w1zz. Also I for one am glad you still use an i7 920@3.8 as that's what I'm still using and won't be updating for a little while yet.

    As for the card this looks good, and performs pretty well (the real boosts in performance are in compute tasks as Anandtech has investigated) but I just get the feeling that the real gains will be in the 8k series when AMD have been able to identify weaknesses in the new arcitecture, so my 5970 gets to stay for another year (longest I've ever had a GPU for).
     
  18. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,854 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,557
    i disagree. i think most users of this card will be on normal sandy bridge. lga2011 is simply a waste of money - and tpu is catered toward the price/performance enthusiast crowd that favours overclocking (that's also why we have an oc'd i7 920 and not some more expensive cpu)

    i haven't upgraded to sandy bridge because of its lack of good multi-gpu support (need two x16 pcie links, otherwise you people would complain about it in the cf / sli reviews).

    i will definitely look into upgrading the vga benchmark rig to ivy bridge, because the i920 will be outdated in 2012
     
    H82LUZ73 and cadaveca say thanks.
  19. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,976 (7.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,532
    Quick since your reading the thread how did you bench BF3?!
     
  20. Assimilator

    Assimilator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    609 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    104
    Location:
    South Africa
  21. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,854 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,557
    single player jet map like everyone else
     
  22. Kaotik New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Since I'm not sure if you got time to read all the posts:
    Can't know for sure if any other card bench is borked, but 6870 results for sure are
     
  23. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,976 (7.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,532
    Ah ok. Thanks!
     
  24. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,854 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,557
    i rebenched the hd 5970 and uploaded new summary graphs with the corrected results
     
    Vipeax and human_error say thanks.
  25. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,935 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,059
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    It just seems to me that those that bought or were interested in SB, have it already. There are a few single-card holdouts, for sure, but most users already with sandybridge bought 6950, chasing the unlock, and most bought two, as for $500, they offered decent performance. icannot see many of those users really interested in the 7970...not @ $500 ea. Those that can afford that cost went GTX580 anyway, you'd think. Perhaps the upgrade itch will sell a lot of cards come tax time, but with retail launch not until January 9th, who knows how it will work.

    2011 overkill and expensive...sure...but the 4-core might save it, if it ever comes out.

    This is the first card launch that I can think of in a long time that doesn't have it's "killer app", too. It's a weird launch...given the overclcoks, you'd think they'd have gone for the "First consumer 1GHz GPU" to match the Guiness record of Bulldozer, or something.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page