1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 3072 MB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Jun 18, 2012.

  1. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,395 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,212
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Normally, if I would to choose between GTX 680 and HD 7970, I'd go for the 7970.
    Too bad various circumstances keep me tied to using Nvidia GPUs :(

    EDIT: Talking about overclocking duds, I had a GeForce 7600 GT, that only went up by 8 Mhz on stock voltage :laugh:
    Crunching for Team TPU
  2. cedrac18

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    99 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Amen brother you nailed perfectly what i have been thinking thinking the whole time.
  3. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,743 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    This GHz Edition card looks like a marketing move. As a whole the HD 7970 is a great card, but I don't think I would pay more money for the GHz edition personally. Anyhow I'll be waiting for the HD 8000 series seeing how I always skip a generation. :D
  4. rvalencia

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Messages:
    83 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Techpowerup haven't included Dirt Showdown with it's latest patch.


    79x0's haven't gimped 64bit DP FP and allocated enough transistors for it.
  5. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Because Ghz Edition is the direct rival pricewise?
  6. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    When we compare high end cards we don't really group cards every 50$ so $500,550 and 600 cards belong more or less in the same league.
    That aside however there are many factory OCed GTX 680's going for $520-540 (check pricegrabber) while the 7970 GHz edition (reference design) goes for around $490-510 so personally i can't figure out why people keep talking about prices when you can get a faster card, with less noise and temperatures for around the same cash.
  7. AthlonX2

    AthlonX2 HyperVtX™

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,135 (2.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,642
    Who is we?
  8. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    Last time i checked anyone who can give over $500 for a card....Unless you are telling me that you would give $500 and not $550 for example....Still if you read my Entire post you will see that there's really no price difference.
  9. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    You really think that AMD would have clocked Tahiti as low as 925MHz if Kepler was already out? I don't think so.

    The most fair comparison is the one made between the GTX 680 and HD 7970 GHz edition.
  10. AthlonX2

    AthlonX2 HyperVtX™

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,135 (2.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,642
    well there is certainly a point where you can no longer justify the price to performance you receive. for instance i purchased a 470 on launch day a few years back for 329 but for 75 more i could have gotten a low end 480 vanilla but the performance difference wasnt that much better :)
  11. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    True, you can get an factory OCed 670 which costs less and is not much slower than the 7970GHz edition nor the 680 but we are not talking about that.

    What we are talking about is which is the best card at around the $500 mark and i simply can't agree that it's the 7970 GHz which is just an OCed version of the normal 7970, not when you can get a Factory OCed GTX 680 at around the same price, with better performance and less noise/temperature levels. It's simple logic actually, nothing more, nothing less.
    EarthDog says thanks.
  12. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    I was just talking about reference vs reference, of course custom models are better there is no doubt about it :), especially when there are Lightnings and Classified out which imo are the best custom cards on the market.
  13. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    For all intends and purpouses Ghz is a reference card :)
    reference vs reference

    oc vs oc:
    This and this settles it then?
    Still, imho best deal of those two is the 7970, same perf, 80 bucks less
  14. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    Reference cooler or not the card is just an OCed 7970, that's all that really matters. And then we also have the price which is almost identical with the ones for custom GTX 680's.

    Why not vs this for example ?
    ASUS GTX680-DC2T-2GD5 GeForce GTX 680 2GB 256-bit ...

    And again you are not talking about the GHz edition so it's off-topic. Custom 7970's have been around for months and still can't surpass custom GTX 680's (just like with reference vs reference).
  15. AthlonX2

    AthlonX2 HyperVtX™

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,135 (2.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,642
    depends on the benchmark no?
  16. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    Well if you use DIRT for example and generally games that are "sponsored" by either camp yes but generally with "neutral" games NV is slightly faster. That's also why AMD rushed to release the GHz edition, let's not forget that.
  17. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    That asus costs 70 bucks more, perf wise the same and don't forget Ghz edition is reference, it's not about you opinion if it is or not man....
  18. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    It's a reference OCed edition. If you are so concerned about custom coolers go ahead and compare it to the link you gave of the EVGA SC which is also a reference OCed GTX 680. It's still a no-win situation performance-wise and the reference cooler of the GTX 680 is still a lot quieter.
    Like i said simple logic, nothing more.
  19. rvalencia

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Messages:
    83 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    On GK104's SMX unit, 192 cores shares 256KB register storage and 64KB cache/buffer.

    On AMD GCN's CU (compute unit), 64 cores shares 64KB local data storage(LDS) + 16KB cache. Each CU has a total of 256KB register storage.

    AMD Radeon HD 7970 has better support for GpGPU(compute shader) i.e. less cores for a given storage.
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2012
  20. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    You can never compare different architectures just by looking at the specifications sheet. It's like when someone compares GPU clocks and thinks they matter.

    As for compute power i said it before, you can purchase a prev. generation with more power compared to the new gen cards by both camps.
  21. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
  22. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    Well i have yet to see a full comparison including the latest GTX 6xx / 7xxx series in terms of compute power but last time i checked it myself the GTX 570/580/590 wiped the floor with the HD 6xxx series so i think they would also do the same with the 7xxx series, unless AMD managed to increase their performance by 200-400%.
  23. raghu78 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2012
    Messages:
    48 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    lets just say Nvidia doesn't stand a chance if you are talking about compute performance. AMD is the only high end compute + gaming chip in town.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/6025/radeon-hd-7970-ghz-edition-review-catching-up-to-gtx-680/14

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-7970-ghz-edition-review-benchmark,3232-14.html
  24. atikkur

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    Messages:
    45 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Jakarta
    that's true.. but please remember, in gaming compute it only utilizes fp32 or hardly uses fp64,, which is nvidias fp32 compute performance is still not way too behind of radeons. so i guess, there is nothing too lose of kepplers or any nvidias compute gaming. it is just how nvidia has big advantage in tesselation, and radeon (now) has big advantage in compute... it is draw.
  25. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    You do realize that the "comparison" you are showing here is flawed in many ways right ?
    1st I doubt they used the latest drivers for the GTX5xx series, naturally that is since there's no way they still have the samples and even if they did it would take too much time to do benchmarks all over again.
    2nd In some charts we see the GTX570/580 but in None do we see the GTX590.
    3rd In other charts we don't even see the GTX5xx series.

    Aside these flaws however it seems to me that even the GTX580 is doing extremely well even against the 7970GHz Edition and we are talking about a card with already almost 2 years in the market.
    Regardless i really doubt there's a faster compute card than the GTX590 right now so i can't understand your last statement. Unless of course you speak about a single chip card.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page