1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon HD 7990 6144 MB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Apr 15, 2013.

  1. Nihilus

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    219 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    2x 8 pin plus the PCI is 375 watts in a PERFECT world. This card doubtfully can get all of that and I think AMD screwed the pooch on the end of it.
     
  2. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,955 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,754
    AMD has full control over the reference board. Their engineers design the PCB routing, pick the components to use and are responsible that it works properly.

    All these cards are produced for AMD and AMD pays for them. If a board partner wants a 7990 he has to buy the card from AMD.

    On other designs the reference design schematics, BOM (bill of materials), PCB layout, advisory documents are released to board partners so they can produce the cards and optionally modify stuff and swap out components to reduce cost or make it "better". That's how non-reference designs are created. I'm not sure if/what requirements AMD puts on these customs designs and what kind of testing AMD requires, but NVIDIA is VERY strict.

    to fix coil noise you need to pick "different" coils, not "better" or "more expensive"

    this is just an engineering problem, it's done in virtually every product in your house that consumes significants amount of power and runs different voltage internally
     
    okidna and EarthDog say thanks.
  3. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,248 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    293
    I thought those products are rigorously tested before released to the public. This makes me think AMD is not as serious company as it should...:mad:
     
  4. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,830 (3.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,485
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    This sounds to me like a quality control issue more than anything else. Still inexcusable, but I can't imagine the engineers testing out the prototypes, hearing this awful noise and going "Yeah, it's just fine!" Nah, can't see that. Someone fucked up somewhere.
     
  5. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    So basically my two Zotac and Gainward cards differ only in serial stickers behind them?

    nVidia produced them and AIB put stickers and box on it, right?

    Thank you for sharing the knowledge, much appreciated.
     
  6. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,830 (3.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,485
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    I wish nvidia had been stricter with the GTX 580 reference design. Until recently, I was using a Zotac Amp! version, which is basically a reference card with a slightly higher clock speed. Everything worked fine, even in the most demanding games and benchmarks designed to stress it out - until I tried Folding@Home with it.

    After a few seconds, it would suddenly start to emit the most abominable and loud coil noise you could imagine. It was so severe in fact, that it broke through the audio circuitry and clearly came out through the speakers!

    I was so pissed off about this that I made a thread about it here. Yeah, sure I could have probably used glue to lessen the problem, but I wasn't up for taking the thing apart and voiding the warranty over this, so I dont run F@H on it.

    I've now got the EVGA GTX 590 in my specs, but haven't gotten around to trying F@H on it yet. I hope this doesn't have the same problem.
     
  7. Rahmat Sofyan

    Rahmat Sofyan

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    99 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Location:
    Pekanbaru -Riau - Indonesia - Earth
    I'm really concerned about performance per dollar score, does it include or considered the 8 game bundle?or only as it is as graphic card?
     
  8. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,478 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    520
    Not an entirely unknown situation. Remember the design problem that the HD 6970 suffered with PCI-E plug placement ?
     
  9. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,955 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,754
    it uses the 1000 USD price and the results from performance summary (not performance summary 2)
     
  10. Rahmat Sofyan

    Rahmat Sofyan

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    99 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Location:
    Pekanbaru -Riau - Indonesia - Earth
    ahhh see :toast:

    now I can see clearly, where is performance per dollar score come

    thanx W1zz.
     
  11. mirakul New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Messages:
    13 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    IMHO, including those 3 Blizzard games in the test is unfair. All of them favor nVidia card and are CPU-tied. Those results don't reflect the actual power of the cards to be honest, turning the overall performance chart to a laughing stock.
    660>7870?
    660Ti>7950?
    680>7970 GHz?
    Sorry, no way in hell :banghead:
     
  12. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,955 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,754
    only star craft ii is cpu limited, the rest scale fine on both manufacturers. amd just fails with their wow crossfire profile
     
  13. mirakul New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Messages:
    13 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    I have some questions for u Wizz
    1. Did you test all the card in your overall performance chart with its latest driver at your time(314.22 and 13.5 beta 2)

    2. Why were your AA settings so inconsistent through out the tests?

    3. According to nVidia, the 314.22 boosts the performance mostly in
    "GeForce GTX 680:
    Up to 41% faster in BioShock Infinite
    Up to 60% faster in Tomb Raider
    Up to 23% faster in Sniper Elite V2
    Up to 13% faster in Sleeping Dogs"

    And they still lost to AMD in your BioShock Infinite, Tomb Raider, Sleeping Dogs tests.
    So, why they suddenly triumphed in your overall performance chart?? If not because of the Starcaft 2 and World of Warcaft results?

    Please enlighten me :confused:
     
  14. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,955 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,754
    1) NVIDIA: 314.22 WHQL, ATI: Catalyst 13.3 Beta 3, HD 7990: 13.5 Beta 2
    2) because that's what the games support
    3) "up to 41%" means 0-41%. highly dependent on settings, card, resolution, aa
    i havent done a detailed analysis of why amd turns out to be slower now. we did remove some benchmarks and added new. shouldn't be hard for you to figure it out.
     
    mirakul says thanks.
  15. mirakul New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Messages:
    13 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Thanks for your response, Wizz
    3. nVidia confirmed that 314.22 driver has the most impact in those listed games, and nVidia's card still lose to AMD in them. So the driver was not the reason why nVidia got ahead overall. It was pointed out in my above post that the boost was from the new games added to your benchmark, which all come from Blizzard and favor nVidia cards (FYI, the recent patch to WoW is a nightmare for AMD users)

    So again, I'm asking about the fairness of your bench.
     
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2013
  16. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,955 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,754
    We added Crysis 3, Tomb Raider and Bioshock Infinite. All games that are bundled by AMD.
    StarCraft II was only temporary removed because they released the addon which caused all older scores to get invalidated.
     
  17. Animalpak

    Animalpak

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,135 (0.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    598
    Location:
    Switzerland
    which one you will get if you have the money ? Look at the price of AMD !! CRAZY !!

    [​IMG]
     
  18. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,955 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,754
    it's just a placeholder for pre-orders. cards won't be available for at least another week
     
    cadaveca says thanks.
  19. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,372 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,601
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    I think you need to take a wee seat and think about how worked up you are getting. When you say a game shouldn't be included because it's unfair against AMD, that's just tough. Blizzard games are massively popular and to not include them is worse. If anything it highlighted AMD's poorer developer relations, something they are now rectifying. Also, in a single game, the AMD card is demolished by the GTX 680 which skews the final performance summary. I don't necessarily think that this is statistically accurate but all the graphs are there for you to see and if you choose to look at individual games, as you should, you will see where the cards strengths are.

    Furthermore, if you want to truly gauge a cards performance, use lots of different sites to examine a global result. I'm afraid you will find most sites tend heavily towards Nvidia cards still. TPU was one of the first places to put a 7970 GHz above a 680 in the performance charts for BF3 so kudos for that surely?

    Finally, it's massively disrespectful to come onto a site as a new person (though I've got a feeling you're not new at all) and effectively criticise one of the more respected technical reviewers and software writers around the tech sites at the moment. It shows a complete lack of understanding and also tremendous naivety regarding the overall purpose of TPU. W1zzard does more than just review gfx cards for a living - that is just a small but unfortunately highly fevered area of tech TPU does.

    I am no moderator and have no vested interest in TPU other than believing that you should take a step back from your own highly opinionated stance and breath in the overall impressions and opinions voiced in what is after all just a single review. You have clearly stated and shown your opinions and you are entitled to them but that does not make them valid or worth incessantly smacking W1zz around the head with.

    Try, if possible to not see the review as a competition between AMD and Nvidia and instead as an objective review of the 7990 against it's peers. W1zz is not alone in his underwhelmed response to the 7990, many others are too. And for balance, obviously some sites think it is awesome in all regards.

    But to finally hammer the point one more time, if the world likes Blizzard games, it would be professionally remiss to neglect them from a review, regardless of how poorly coded they are for AMD cards. And remember, Tomb Raider hobbled Nvidia on release. The code given to Nvidia was not the final release code. So that was very unfair to Nvidia but the game is still in the review, fair or not.
     
    Zubasa, HumanSmoke, mirakul and 5 others say thanks.
  20. mirakul New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Messages:
    13 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Thanks for your lecture, guys, and a special thanks to W1zz's great patience.

    From the statistic perspective, the fact that an observation changed the overall result is still tickling me. However, I get what you guys wanna give here.

    I'm looking for your next review, W1zz!

    Cheers :toast:
     
  21. Nihilus

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    219 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Seems that tri-fire is AMDs strong side. Tweaktown has a review of a 7990 + 7970 in trifire. It had great scaling and matched or beat SLI titans in most cases. Tom's had a trifire 6870 review way back when that had great scaling as well. Any chance Wizzard will follow suit?
     
  22. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,687 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    348
    Location:
    Tennessee
    When are the OEMs going to release this card? What is the hold up?
     
  23. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,830 (3.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,485
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    That would totally drive me nuts, even for a minute. What a fail.
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2013
  24. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,478 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    520
    Was supposed to be the 7th May for retail availability. Judging by the lack of cards at Newegg, and all of three verified owner reviews, I'm guessing that the cards must be hand made.
     
    Fluffmeister says thanks.
  25. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,687 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    348
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Does anyone know if they have resolved the coil noise? At $599 plus 8 games it's really hard to turn this down.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page