1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Readies a Pair of Energy-Efficient Socket FM2 APUs

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 3, 2013.

  1. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,029 (6.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,094
    I finally managed to find my Kill-a-Watt:
    [​IMG]

    This is Rig2 in my sig so:
    4.4GHz CPU Overclock
    1013MHz GPU Overclock

    Idle...50w! And this is driving 3 monitors.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  2. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    The 3570K is NOT the same apple as you said.... I have no idea why your comparing power consumption from a chip that is over $200 and a more expensive platform. If someone is that concerned about power consumption, they can easily downclock and undervolt and CPU or APU. This discussion is worthless comparing the 2.

    Very nice Tekie. Every time the Trinity discussion comes up, those that argue against it.. don't own one.... It is all their conjecture.
     
  3. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    I would, if given a budget of 500 bucks for CPU and GPU, exclusively for gaming (which I'd generally spend on)... it'd be i3-3240 + R7970, not i5-3570K + R7870... of which I'm pretty sure, in 90% of the scenarios, would be a great deal faster then the latter setup.


    Anyway, as I've said before... A10-6700T looks like a desktop version of the A10-5750M, same CPU clocks, same GPU clocks, same IMC speed support, just 10W more on the TDP (dunno why...).

    This plus a nanoITX FM2 board and fast RAM would make a great SteamBox, LOL.
     
  4. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,029 (6.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,094
    Exactly, and a lot of them think that overclocking AMD APUs will cause the power consumption to go "through the roof", but since I left all the power saving features enabled and just raised the multiplier and load voltage, the idle power consumption stays pretty reasonable. And since this machine sits idle 90% of the time, it just sits there sipping power, it isn't gobbling down power like some say that it will.

    I figured it out, at that power consumption, running 24/7/365(because this is my server), this machine will cost me ~$55 a year to run. Even if the 3220 consumes marginally less power at idle(and I don't believe it does) it isn't going to make but a few bucks difference. The power consumption argument is pretty pointless.

    I went with the APU over the 3220 because it gives me the great power consumption while idle AND the much more powerful CPU and GPU when I need it. Oh, yeah, and the AMD build was cheaper.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  5. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    I'm also guessing the FM2 motherboard is quite a bit more feature packed than what you would have gotten on a crappy H61 or B75 tops, 1155 motherboard for the Intel setup...
     
  6. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,029 (6.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,094
    Definitely, all SATA 6Gbps ports, 6 USB3.0 ports on the back and 2 more front panel, dual PCI-E x16, overclocking/voltage control options out the ass, debug LED, onboard power/reset buttons...oh and the board only costs $80!
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page