1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Reintroduces FX Brand for High-End Processors and Platforms at E3

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jun 7, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,436 (11.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,620
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    AMD today reintroduced the FX brand for PC processors and platforms at the Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3). FX-branded products will be geared toward enthusiast PCs and HD entertainment aficionados. AMD also announced new members for its "Gaming Evolved" program, driving the PC gaming experience forward with native HD3D support in Eidos Montreal's "Deus Ex: Human Revolution," and new collaborations with Bioware, Creative Assembly and Codemasters.

    The FX brand is associated with AMD's fastest processors and most powerful platforms -- those designed for unrestrained PC performance for the ultimate gaming and HD entertainment experiences. In addition, these processors and platforms drive rich visuals for graphics-intensive applications and high-resolution AMD Eyefinity multi-monitor configurations. The first platform to earn the FX title, the "Scorpius" platform, will feature the now-available AMD 9-series chipset motherboards and AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series graphics cards, plus the upcoming "Zambezi" unlocked, native eight-core processor.

    "AMD's FX brand will enable an over-the-top experience for PC enthusiasts," said Leslie Sobon, vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing, AMD. "By combining an unlocked, native eight-core processor, the latest in chipset technology, and AMD's latest graphics cards, FX customers will enjoy an unrivalled feature set and amazing control over their PC's performance."

    AMD Adds New Members, Titles to Gaming Evolved
    Furthering its commitment to PC gaming innovation and promoting an open and advanced experience for gamers, AMD continues to add members and grow relationships in the second year of the Gaming Evolved program. True to its previously announced commitment to PC gamers, AMD remains focused on working with the best software developers to maximize the user experience. Gaming Evolved combines AMD's expanded support for Microsoft DirectX® 11 games (which use the latest graphics technology from Microsoft), along with AMD Eyefinity multiple-monitor configurations, AMD Dual Graphics (which enable multiple graphics processors in one computer), and native AMD HD3D support to enable standards-based stereo 3D display capabilities for a truly immersive 3D visual experience.(2)

    "Since the launch of AMD's open stereo 3D initiative last year, developers have been embracing native 3D support that will work with a range of 3D glasses and monitors from different vendors," said Neal Robison, director of ISV Relations, AMD. "This excitement by developers is starting to pay off with the announcement by Eidos-Montreal that 'Deus Ex: Human Revolution,' will enable native stereo 3D support."

    With AMD HD3D, gamers can experience amazing stereoscopic 3D gaming image quality for a more realistic experience. AMD HD3D technology supports more than 400 titles through AMD's technology partners, and AMD's open 3D ecosystem approach encourages the broadest selection of 3D solutions, available at the most affordable cost.

    "We are thrilled to be working with AMD, an innovative leader in PC hardware and software, incorporating their technology into Deus Ex: Human Revolution for PC," said Stephane D'Astous, general manager of Eidos-Montreal, a Square Enix studio. "It's also exciting that Deus Ex: Human Revolution is the first video game title optimized to natively utilize AMD HD3D-capable hardware. Coupled with AMD Eyefinity functionality, PC gamers will be even more immersed in the action-rich gameplay and compelling storyline."

    In addition to Eidos, AMD's new partners include major developers of critically acclaimed titles, including Bioware's "Dragon Age II," Creative Assembly's "SHOGUN 2: Total War" and Codemasters' "DiRT 3," which will include native support for DirectX 11, AMD Eyefinity and AMD Dual Graphics technologies.

    AMD at E3 2011
    E3 attendees can experience these stunning technologies with their own eyes at the AMD booth (#823 South Hall), which will feature demos of AMD technologies and upcoming game titles including "Orcs Must Die!" from Robot Entertainment and DirectX 11-enabled "Blacklight: Retribution" from Perfect World.
    H82LUZ73, Damn_Smooth and Jack Doph say thanks.
  2. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    Good to hear AMD getting more involved with the game devs. They have been seriously lacking in that arena.

    And dammit AMD, I want performance numbers, not crappy press releases.
    remixedcat says thanks.
  3. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,609 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,244
    Hmmm, well f**k me sideways.

    they didnt hesitate to put the can on the FX line after the skt 939. there was a small selection of FX chips made after the 939 era but they were mainly only for server/industry applications all back in 2006. I even remember reading the press release when they announced that they were dropping the 'FX' name.
  4. Yellow&Nerdy?

    Yellow&Nerdy?

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    370 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Give us a release date and some concrete performance numbers, god dammit.
  5. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,477 (6.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,430
    Location:
    IA, USA
    The last time FX was used, AMD was bitch slapping Intel. Maybe the same holds true today and that's why they resurrected the name? If so, expect FX chips to have the same price tag they did then too--$500+ a pop. That sucks for overclockers though because you gotta spend big bucks to get unlocked multipliers again.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. b82rez New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    134 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Hobart, Australia
    Prices have already been leaked afaik and the dearest CPU is like 320 dollars... I'm a big fan of AMD but highly doubt this can go toe to toe with Ivy, let alone Sandy! :ohwell:
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  7. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,477 (6.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,430
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Damn. :(

    One can always hope.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    Gips performance out of the FX series is about 2x-4x that of SB/IB supposedly

    :toast:
  9. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    core for core clock for clock is what I want to know. gamers dont need more than a quad core at the moment. 8 cores will be nye on useless unless they have seriously beefed the performance clock for clock.
  10. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    Battlefield 3 and BC2 can use more than 8 cores

    :slap:

    Get with the times we need more cores more than ever

    :nutkick:
  11. slyfox2151

    slyfox2151

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,606 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    524
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Fixed.
    Isenstaedt says thanks.
  12. DanTheMan

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2010
    Messages:
    210 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    Houston,TX
    AMD
    Fuc*ing
    eXtreme

    Time to pull the rabbit out of the hat!
  13. b82rez New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    134 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Hobart, Australia
    Don't see how you fixed it. I was implying that the Bulldozer is coming out at around the same time as Ivy and I doubt it can compete with it OR compete with Intel's latest offering.
  14. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUIO7pLCCbE

    Just wait till you see what it is powered by

    :roll:

    Bulldozer is out right now but it isn't going to be sold till OEMs/Partners start buying
  15. b82rez New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    134 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Hobart, Australia
    Haha, yeah. I'm not doubting these chips will be awesome, just saying Intel will still have the upper hand...

    I'm actually an AMD fan, Have had AMD systems for the past five-six years.

    Also my overclocked X6 and 5850 smashes out Dirt 3 just fine! ;)
  16. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    If they can just release the FX cpus this year they will have a 2 year lead in performance till Haswell and even then it might not be able to handle 22nm BD NG

    Hate how the OEMs chose Llano to be the first to release
  17. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,567 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    515
    Location:
    Australia
    Yea i agree, i cant see AMD bringing back the FX branding if these are slower then Sandy Bridge, just wouldn't make sense to me and it would make AMD look stupid. When i look at benchmarks of the 2600k and AMD's top CPU there isnt that much difference in performance realy(Granted Sandy wins all), but most are close, and a few the 2600k flies in but realy its not to far out of reach that i think these new Bulldozer CPU's will indeed perform better then Sandy, if not then ill be surprised TBH.

    But not long now till we know the answer :toast:
  18. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    thats 2 games man, hardly worth a nutkick, not to mention BC2 flies on a quad core. also check some benchmarks and you'll see that the game runs faster on a 2500K than it does a X6 1100T. (4 cores vs 6 cores both at 3.3ghz)

    http://techreport.com/articles.x/20188/7

    clock for clock matters a hec of a lot man.

    im not saying more cores is a bad thing, but at present I'd much prefer a CPU that has better per core performance, this generally equates to a smoother experience. 4 cores is plenty for another year at least IMO.
  19. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    I can sum it pretty up quickly

    2008(core i7,i5,i3, 2nd gen) vs 2003(k8-k10.5)

    We can only wait till we see

    2008(i7) vs 2009(BD)
  20. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    I'm not sure what you are arguing against... I love more cores as much as the next man... but the point I want to make is that I sincerely hope performance per core is up by a lot (lets say 25%+) compared to current PII's.
    MikeMurphy says thanks.
  21. JATownes

    JATownes

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,824 (0.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    433
    What are you talking about? :confused: The Zambezi processor, what most of us refer to as the true Bulldozer has NOT been released, hell we can't even get official benchmark numbers yet. And what makes you think the OEM chose to have Llano out first? I am pretty sure that was an in house AMD decision because Zambezi wasn't quite ready yet. Hell, there are rumors of delays in the Zambezi launch now...
  22. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    well saying phenom II x4 does 75 gips

    and then saying FX-4K does 200-400 gips isn't enough for you?

    Official benchmarks are NDA till the consumer launch date and that launch date is the launch date

    Zambezi is ready and has been since March-April, if there was any delays it would have affected Llano as well but it seems Llano is going to release early and because of Llanos unexpected performance the launch of Zambezi is getting pushed back so they can maximize profits from Llano
  23. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,937 (7.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,511
    Looking forward to benches. Until then everything anyone says is BS.
    b82rez and wolf say thanks.
  24. Yellow&Nerdy?

    Yellow&Nerdy?

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    370 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Adding cores doesn't benefit the most of us. Quad-cores will do just fine there. What I wish is that Bulldozer increases the "clock to clock" performance. E.g. a quad-core Bulldozer at 3.2 GHz would beat a Phenom II quad-core at 3.2 GHz by 30%.
    wolf says thanks.
  25. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    heresay for the time being, not to mention if that doesnt equate to gaming performance then it matters little to me anyway.

    this. show me the benchmarks, then I'll believe what they say.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page