1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Slips Out Radeon HD 7670 to OEMs

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 5, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,705 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,668
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Without making any noise, AMD rolled out an OEM-exclusive graphics card model, the Radeon HD 7670. This GPU is completely identical to the previous-generation Radeon HD 6670, making it a rebrand. It has identical specifications to the 40 nm Turks GPU, which drives the retail HD 6670, with 480 VLIW5 stream processors, a 128-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface holding 512 MB or 1 GB of memory, 24 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and clock speeds of 800 MHz core, and 4.00 GHz memory. This GPU was featured on some of HP's desktop PC products. The product page of this OEM-only GPU can be found here.

    [​IMG]

    Source: Anandtech
     
    Maban says thanks.
  2. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,219 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    844
    Disappointed am i a bit
     
  3. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    As expected really.
     
  4. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,219 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    844
    Yes it is, but i think the HDX600 segment deserves to enjoy the benifits of 28nm, even if it sais that these cards will launch abit late
     
  5. BrooksyX

    BrooksyX

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    3,947 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    569
    Both teams do this. Are any of us that really suprised. What bugs me though is that they just up it from the 6670 to the 7670. They should at least drop it to like the 7570 to make some kind of note that its not supposed to be an upgrade from the 6670 as one would normally assume.
     
  6. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,372 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,601
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    When NVIDIA did this a few years back they were villified. It's a shame people seem more accepting of AMD when they do it. The mucky part is that it's a 7 series nomenclature with no 7 series perks that you'd expect. The saving grace is you only buy it in oem systems. But still...
     
    CrAsHnBuRnXp says thanks.
  7. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,259 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    966
    This is deliberate misdirection/misrepresentation to the end consumer. :shadedshu The fact that this behaviour is getting more prevalent is no reason to accept it as ethical or legitimate. One day consumer rights group will score a class-action and put a stop to it. The sooner the better. :pimp:
     
  8. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,196 (5.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,982
    Location:
    Home
    They did that on their flagship card, and also it wasn't the most common thing to do back then. To be honest, the graphics card has gotten so powerful in comparison with most games that its pointless to keep on redesigning new chips, a simple rebrand would suffice most of the time.
     
  9. meirb111 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    184 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    this is bad since from the 5670 you get only 20% and so 2+ years and you get only 20%? if you need to upgrade from 5670 to another low power card, this is a joke the mid to lower segment is not moving. the same is true for nvidia they also give nothing for the lower segment since your only option is the very weak 520 card or older 440 .if you wait 2+ years for an upgrade you need to get at least 150% if not more and not 20% ,so instead of bang for the buck you get crap for the buck
     
  10. _JP_

    _JP_

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,684 (1.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    738
    Location:
    Portugal
    OEM and rebrand? Damn it AMD. :shadedshu
     
  11. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,372 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,601
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    That's what i'm talking about. Just say that NVIDIA did it. It doesn't make it right. The primary numerals of a generation refers to it's apparent ascendancy over previous generations. Selling the identical gpu as a newer generation still blatantly wrong. Just like when NV did it. A rebrand is not warranted, it's deliberately misleading. Just like when NV did it (irrespective of flagship status or not).
     
  12. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,259 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    966
    OK, let's just start a new "club". I'll kick it off. I will buy my next GPU from whichever manufacturer doesnt play this silly rebranding game on their latest generation cards.

    (Let's hope I can upgrade this century... LOL)

    My single purchase won't make a drop in the ocean. But it's the principle.
     
  13. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,372 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,601
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    lol. You'll not be buying any new cards then. As Fourstaff and I have discussed, they both do it. I hear consoles are good.
     
  14. punani

    punani

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    119 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Location:
    Finland
    Business jerks thinking they are clever once again by fooling the uninformed consumer... This makes AMD look stupid and a shitty reputation spreads fast these days.

    I myself never bother with midrange cards anymore as I am always unsure of how old the tech actually is.. And it makes it very difficult to pick out a laptop/desktop for friends asking for advice on new machines.

    Very lame AMD... :mad:
     
  15. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    This is disappointing.
     
  16. cloudwan New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    12 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Malaysia
    Now thats really dissappointing... :twitch::twitch:
     
  17. Widjaja

    Widjaja

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,819 (1.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    636
    Location:
    Wangas, New Zealand
    Never really miss out on anything impressive with the X650-70s anyway.

    They're just GPUs with meh performance.
     
  18. Harlequin_uk New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    123 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Location:
    UK
    AMD have no reason to make any better tbh , the GT520? on die is better now , the GT440? its slower and costs more (money and power) than the 6670 - and with a mature 40nm process the costs of a rebrand means it can be kept cheap
     
  19. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,235 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    203
    My first "real" vid card was a 5670 used it for a month or two. Now just in the box. Allways toyed wigh the idea of getting a second just for kicks in the wife or boys computer. May be.....
     
  20. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,196 (5.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,982
    Location:
    Home
    Doesn't make them right, but on the other hand, pressures of marketing is going to force them to do it anyway. Nvidia still does their rebranding in the mobile line, and so far I have not heard significant complaints other than your usual grumble here and there. The 6770 might be more expensive when it was launched, but over a few weeks the price difference between 5770 and 6770 was quite small, so even if its a rebrand as long as they cost the same I don't think there will be massive harm, other than your occasional idiot who buys new stuff without even bother to do any research, in which case its his/her fault.
     
  21. Thrackan

    Thrackan

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,482 (1.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    656
    How does a rebrand "suffice"?

    It does nothing other than using a new name for old tech and thus is misleading to customers.

    Let the 6670 be the 6670, and don't make a 7670 model if you're too lazy, AMD. There are too many cards per "generation" as it is, which is already confusing customers (at least some people I know of), and if they are actually older tech, that's just plain wrong.

    There should be lawsuits for this stuff.
     
  22. Semi-Lobster

    Semi-Lobster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    353 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    The X600 series is supposed to be AMD's flagship card for low power users. No 6 pin connector/great performance. This is VERY disappointing, I wanted to pick up a high end 28nm video card that I was going to use on a lighter system I will be working on, now I might as well get a 6670.
     
  23. Isenstaedt

    Isenstaedt New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    211 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    So the cheapest 28nm card they'll be releasing is the $150 7770? Back in the day there used to be <$100 cards.
     
  24. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,372 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,601
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    You're too pleasant a chap to argue with. As long as we're agreed it's wrong by misleading the consumer and at the same time it's also what businesses do. :toast:
     
  25. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,248 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    293
    Can I penta-Cross this??:p
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page