1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Socket FM2 APU Preview

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by cadaveca, Sep 24, 2012.

  1. PopcornMachine

    PopcornMachine

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Los Angeles/Orange County CA
    I'm just going to say I like this site and respect your guys knowledge and reviews, but I just disagree with your decision to do this. Don't see that it helps anyone here.
     
  2. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,044 (4.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,202
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I get that, and really I do value everyone's feedback. Not all content I produce is going to be for everyone, but with only 60,000 member, but like 1.5 million monthly viewers, forum posters aren't TPU's only audience. :p

    I'll havea proper review for you guys soon...and I'll have had a TONNE of time to do it. :p
     
  3. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,677 (9.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,153
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    From the benches I have seen around the web, it shows the 7660D beating the HD5770 and HD5830
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  4. Tonim89

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    50 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Location:
    Juiz de Fora - MG / Brazil
    I'd advise you to don't expect nothing close to them, or you will get disapointed.

    A paired HD 6670 could do it, but then the scenario changes a little bit.
     
  5. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    844 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Location:
    Look behind you!!
    So where are the dual socket boards so we can have 8 cores and Crossfire the gpus?

    Come on AMD give us a chipset :cool:
     
    Jizzler says thanks.
  6. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,677 (9.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,153
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    I dunno I guess we will see once the final review is done wont we.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  7. Tonim89

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    50 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Location:
    Juiz de Fora - MG / Brazil
    But that's where the preview shine. See what dave posted, you will get a parameter to measure the performance.

    I'll repeat, don't expect that much from them, the chance of getting disapointed is high. The APUs are amazing, but they are still too imature to achieve this level.
     
  8. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,554 (3.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,124
    Location:
    Mexico
    I think that's far fetched at best. Beating an HD5670? sure. An HD6670? with some OCing I could believe so, but an HD5770?! 384 VLIW4 shaders @ 800Mhz vs 800 VLIW5 shaders @ 850Mhz?! I don't think so. :confused:

    Had it been 384GCN shaders it would land between the 6670 and 6770 I think.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,474 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    520
    What lies would they be? I've been over Scott's editorial word-by-word, and unless the original email is incorrect (which I doubt) I don't see any lies. I see Scott given a set of parameters to work within, and his opinion on those. If you see a different set of parameters, maybe you should look to the second statement you made...
    And this pertains to Scott Wasson's position how ?
    So leaving out Price, OC testing and CPU benchmarking was a request from AMD and not a violation of NDA- since NDA is less a request than an edict.
    OK. You lost me on that one. I'd actually consider that stance from a tech enthusiast to be complete bollocks....unless of course AMD are marketing Trinity APU's with box art featuring a warning: " THIS PRODUCT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH PRODUCTIVITY OR NON-DVXA MEDIA APPLICATIONS"
    Mentioning your posting rate is immaterial. The link was prominently displayed a few comments above your own in jimbo75's post under the TR article. The fact that the only instance of something vaguely similar happening is a singular event 6+ years ago isn't that compelling.

    I'd ask the question whether the AMD cheerleading squad would happily defend a similar stance if Intel were to allow "previews" of Ivy Bridge/Haswell's CPU's based on CPU computation only, with IGP performance embargoed (or requested held back as the case may be) until the CPU goes retail....NDA for CPU related benches expires on the same day as the SKU's go retail does it not?
     
    BigMack70 says thanks.
  10. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,044 (4.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,202
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Meh, I'm just saying that it isn't always the way it's construed. His opinion isn't wrong...but it might not apply to all people. It doesn't apply to me.

    As to what I was requested to NOT post, I was also given TO post, but in AMD's own slides. I used AMD's images given outside those slides, but none of their marketing other than that.


    He could have done a preview, and said whatever he wanted...if he had hardware. He's whining because to get the free hardware, he had to do a few things.


    I didn't need AMD's hardware.


    :laugh:

    You're right though, I never mean my opinion to be the end-all, be-all. It's just MY opinion. :)
     
  11. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,474 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    520
    I'd probably see it as Scott wanting unfettered freedom to write the review in any way he see's fit. Personally I see it as more of an idealized concept-but it's his site, and I have no issues with the stance. IF you couldn't purchase a Trinity APU or FM2 board prior to all the information being out in the wild then the issue would be moot. The fact that you can pre-order both makes it somewhat of a grey area- and remember AMD had prior form with this type of manipulation with hyping Bulldozer and engaging in some very dubious guerrilla marketing practices in order to shift 990FX/X boards in the months prior to the CPU dropping.

    Again, personally, I don't have any qualms about publishing the data. It would however, in the interest of full disclosure, present a more complete picture when the rationale for the reviews content-or lack of, is included. You can call these Trinity articles that appear all over the tech news previews to your hearts content, but they are for all intents and purposes reviews, albeit only the first installment. Anything else is pure semantics.

    Really. I could have sworn you said you were in need of A85 board to fully test the APU
    :laugh:
     
  12. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,931 (4.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,619
    Netburts/core 2. Threats, secret discounts, bribes, etc
     
  13. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,044 (4.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,202
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta

    Actually, I'd just call it marketing. Because that's what it is. I jsut made sure that what was presented was true.


    For a launch review of the APU, yes, but since i review motherboards, I would have got one shortly after anyway. I could have used my A75 board and just said that same thing I did about that, anyway. To get teh big picture, you bet that trying out that chipset is required...it might make no difference at all...or it might. I don't know until I try.

    Like, I dunno. Being a reviewer, to me, ain't a big deal, at all. Like really, I'm just some dude typing from his basement. I mean really...in the end, I just make sure that what I report in my reviews is the truth. I don't ever expect to be able to do any more than that.

    Heck, I think I'm lucky these companies even send me stuff.
     
  14. symmetrical New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2012
    Messages:
    65 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    No wonder I didn't see CPU benchmarks.

    But in a way I see the angle AMD is trying to force here with the APUs which is gaming, for which that is what most of the consumers who look to buy an APU will use it for.

    However it is still sneaky and unnecessary for them to try and stranglehold the review process from tech websites.

    It's even rather more stupid that it's only for a week.

    Oh well. Corporations will act like corporations. Nothing new here, move along. :shadedshu
     
  15. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,931 (4.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,619
    Once NDA is lifted for both Trinity and Vishera ill start looking.
     
  16. jagd

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2009
    Messages:
    457 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    89
    Location:
    TR
    It has been done by asking testing with only certain programs with showing better than competitor , asking to tell certain things like multimedia extensions back in the day pentium 4 days while they performed bad vs AMD ,or closing eyes to problems etc etc ( intel had a problem with 1156 socket iirc last year only one site and afew forums talked about this etc etc.

     
  17. NHKS

    NHKS New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    596 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    something I didn't see before..

    AMD has a RAM Disk feature(software utility) that will be part of the Trinity APUs.. as expected, it allow the user to create a RAM partition with a capacity of up to 64 GB(not sure if one can find such dense module kits easily)... The user can copy its game directory onto this partition or any other program that he uses frequently and will benefit greatly from the faster data transfer.

    the slide below suggests they have some pretty significant performance claims to make for this

    [​IMG]

    not sure if it will be available from launch or support requirements.. Dave should know
     
    cadaveca and HTC say thanks.
  18. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,044 (4.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,202
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    AMD hasn't given more data about that other than that one slide to me. That press deck arrived after I had already written the preview, unfortunately.



    Everything that is offered, together, is actually pretty interesting to me.
     
    NHKS says thanks.
  19. HTC

    HTC

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,240 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    303
    Interesting.
     
  20. Rei86 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    172 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    COME ON AMD

    Daddy has an itch to build a new HTPC because the old rig is just old!@!@! GARAGAGAGAGAGAGARARRRRRRAGAG

    Also some places have already posted prices anyways since someone at some retail store leaked a photo of the APUs listings.
     
  21. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,944 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,735
    there is plenty free ramdisk software out there. my guess is amd got talked into spending some money and bought some external software
     
    NHKS says thanks.
  22. gourygabriev New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    8 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    I know I might asking too much specially since testing is so time consuming...

    I just have a request if possible on the review.

    I was wondering if it would be possible to also have the trinity with a premium GPU like the 7970 or 680 as one of the tests with low quality and ultra settings on games.
     
  23. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,143 (1.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    If Llano was any indicator with a high end GPU you're losing out. APU's are intended to be used with their included iGPU's, and operate optimally with them. Otherwise you're looking at a lower end FX CPU with (probably) higher power consumption and lacking greatly in Cache. I wish AMD would hurry up and consolidate APU's and CPU's to the same socket.

    As for the whole review fiasco. I read a decent analysis of it; http://www.geek2eak.com/wordpress/2012/09/amd-preview-unethical/

    I just don't necessarily agree with AMD shaping the way their products are reviewed. Regardless of how fantastic the iGPU portion of an APU is, the CPU side is still important, and very relevant since a good portion of day to day tasks still rely heavily on it.
     
  24. Absolution

    Absolution

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2012
    Messages:
    273 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    So much fuss over this. THG already had a preview of eng. samples. Everyone knows that in terms of raw CPU power AMD cannot match intel counterparts. I mean intel's range and amd's range are completely out of sync.

    The only thing AMD got now is their discrete gpu flexing its muscles against Intel's HD series, and at the end of the day its only a certain / small segment that AMD is targeting and winning over.

    The piledriver's 15-16% performance increase over the llano's top is disappointing, considering that the platform has to be changed and no new set of radeons it can be paired with.

    And whats with the A10-A85 matching? Those three slides pairing chipsets with processor models is confusing. Hopefully there will be some comparison on an A10 with an A75/A85 chipset (with no overclocking intended).
     
  25. warpuck New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    5 miles North of CaNanda
    what no i3 k models?

    Amd makes 3 65 watt trinitys (locked)

    Buy AMD ram and get amd unlimited ram disk included>>free

    The trick is to get it to boot from the ram disk.

    which i3 + GPUS give the same VIDEO performance as a10-5700 with hd 6670 & the a10without th hd 6670?

    I am going put one these in my mATX case with the optional hd 6670.

    It will probable that it be will a Asus board because the turboV is the neatest thing since sliced bread on a Sabertooth, IMO. Of couse it will be a K cpu


    __________________________________________________

    The ocean is blue unless you are coast guard, then it is green
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page