1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Still Committed To x86 - But Not In High End Desktop

Discussion in 'News' started by qubit, Dec 1, 2011.

  1. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (4.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,479
    Further to our article yesterday, that AMD was to give up competing with Intel, they have now made a statement which semi-clarifies their future strategy. AMD told The Verge, that they are still committed to x86, but have decided to concentrate on low power, emerging markets and the cloud:
    This sounds very much like they are giving up competing with Intel in the high-end x86 CPU market, but will instead compete with the likes of ARM, NVIDIA, TI and Intel in the low power market. It doesn't seem like a good strategy however, not least because getting the power use levels of an x86 CPU right down to ARM levels and still have some semblance of performance seems to be an unachievable aim, as Intel has already found out. The problem is that the ancient and complex x86 instruction set dating from the late 1970s, requires complex decode logic and a bigger chip (more transistors) to implement. It also isn't very fast, which is why all the various "turbocharging" technologies and enhancements have had to be applied to it over the years to bring us the fast CPUs we see today. These are all very expensive on transistor budget, power and require a high clock speed. The fact that all modern x86 CPUs are actually hybrid x86 (32-bit) & x64 (64-bit) machines adds an order of magnitude to the problem, as they're almost two CPUs in one. Time will tell whether AMD were right to go down this road.
    Super XP, nt300, Chicken Patty and 3 others say thanks.
  2. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,392 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    633
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    It's not that bad of a strategy.

    Going to spend as much on the Intel upgrade for myself as I will for the AMD Trinity machines for my little users.
  3. v12dock

    v12dock

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,538 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    297
    no doubt the brazos is awesome and APUs are awesome, but will Intel run rampant with pricing if AMD drops out of high end.
  4. Paulieg

    Paulieg The Mad Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,912 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,978
    Location:
    Wherever I can find the iron.
    Yes, price would run rampant. Let's hope they don't bail completely on enthusiast chips. That will be bad for consumers, period.
    WarEagleAU and qubit say thanks.
  5. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,741 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    YES :cry:
  6. xanagu

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    13 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    pussies
  7. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,892 (2.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,182
    How can AMD "drop out of high end" if they weren't even there NOW? :laugh:
    AsRock, El_Mayo, Eva01Master and 4 others say thanks.
  8. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (4.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,479
    Indeed, it will be a disaster.
  9. Paulieg

    Paulieg The Mad Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,912 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,978
    Location:
    Wherever I can find the iron.
    Well, you can laugh now, but when you see Intel chips go up 50-60% at every price point, you'll be...:banghead::cry: I know I will, and I'm more or less neutral with Intel and AMD...but I want to be able to still afford enthusiast hardware.
    mediasorcerer, AsRock and WarEagleAU say thanks.
  10. 1c3d0g

    1c3d0g

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    683 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Uhm...no. Intel is a leader in x86 microprocessor design, AMD is just a distant runner-up. They always have been. AMD should stick to making low-power and efficient architectures and better graphics processors, which is where they're competitive. Forget Opteron, forget Bulldozer/Piledriver or whatever else architecture is coming down the pipeline. And forget DRAM modules too, that's a low-margin, cut-throat business that even Samsung, Micron, Hynix and other established players are having a hard time with.

    It's time to make money before the ship sinks. :(
    Chevalr1c and tomkaten say thanks.
  11. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,892 (2.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,182
    Shouldn't that have happened already, since none of the Phenoms were in the high-end pricepoints to begin with, i.e. sharing "space" with Nehalem?
  12. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (4.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,479
    I would say that they still had enough performance to keep Intel at bay, since they could still be put to all the same uses as an Intel chip, especially including things like 3D gaming and video encoding. This allowed users to decide between AMD budget CPUs or Intel performance CPUs.

    Now, AMD CPUs will no longer be able to be put to all the same uses, as they're gonna have the comparable performance of an Atom, therefore, there's gonna be no competition at all from Intel and they'll have that monopoly that they've so long lusted after. This is bad, really bad.
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  13. Paulieg

    Paulieg The Mad Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,912 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,978
    Location:
    Wherever I can find the iron.
    Anticipation of AMD's potential stopped it from happening, that and a good price to performance ratio for everything except the very top end. If the bow out of competing in the middle of the enthusiast market, it will give Intel cause to raise prices on everything except low power chips.
  14. j924 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    Spokane, Washington
    I'm a little confused, does this mean that AMD will stop production of all PC CPUs? The first article it just sounded like they were stopping production of server processors like the Opteron.
  15. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,381 (3.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,933
    Location:
    Mexico
    Who to the what now? :wtf: Who said that? Aren't we reading a little too much between lines? :banghead:

    Low power doesn't necessarily means "tablets". For all we know, AMD is referring to their APUs.

    And, as I stated in the previous thread, this just means that AMD will concede the upper midrange and high end to Intel. AMD's top offerings hover between Core i3 and Core i5 performance anyway, so they aren't really leaving anything at the table. Instead of investing wasting resources trying to trounce Intel in the high end they will concentrate on their core market and expand to the ones they have started to develop.
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2011
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. Lionheart

    Lionheart

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,022 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    794
    Location:
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Meh, had a feeling this was gonna happen --_--
  17. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    Yeah... that... right.. :shadedshu
    1c3d0g says thanks.
  18. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (4.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,479
  19. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,614 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    166
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    Says the guy using AMD tech on his intel.

    This has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

    And forget opteron? You mean forget the CPU that powers a lot of the most powerful supercomputers on the planet at a fraction of the price of intel (same applies for regular servers)?

    I think you need to get out of intel shill boot camp. It's Fing with your mind severely.

    On a side note: I wonder how much I can get a phase change set up for that will make intel apologists wet their bed.
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2011
  20. Fx

    Fx

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    497 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    my thoughts exactly. this is one reason why I have always supported them

    we'll see how long you keep laughing...
  21. mav2000

    mav2000 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    451 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    Well, does that mean the end of the Bulldozer/Piledriver going ahead? Or is that still going to happen. Will a BD B3 chip exist?
  22. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    I tell you what, if AMD does die soon it will be because of news like this flying around the internet scaring off their investors.
  23. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,425 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    873
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Actually low and mid end is not that bad. After all, if they make mid segment right, they can make some serious profits. It's just that they won't satisfy high end consumers. But maybe while doing low power stuff, they'll make a breakthrough and try at the high end again. No one says they are not allowed to do that.
  24. Fx

    Fx

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    497 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    speculation is a silent and deadly killer
  25. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,691 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    950
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    AMD is late to the mobile game, Samsung, TI, and even Nvidia have solid offerings that are mature and command a high market percentage of both smartphones and tablets, if AMD wants to be a real player in this arena (and to be honest I don't sew how using an x86 architecture might help after seeing Intel stumble for so many years on this market) they better get their shit together, and pronto, or they risk becoming another VIA, or even worst: Cyrix or Transmeta :(

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page