1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Sued for Overestimating APU Success to Investors

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 17, 2014.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,258 (11.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,586
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Some investors in AMD, who purchased company stock between October 27, 2011 and October 18, 2012, filed a class action lawsuit against AMD, through law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd. The class action alleges that AMD and its officers and directors committed violations of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934. AMD allegedly misled its investors over how popular its first generation "Llano" desktop APU would get, claiming that there were much greater prospects for the APU than it actually ended up selling.

    [​IMG]

    The law firm detailing its suit writes:
    When AMD announced its Q2-2012 results in July of that year, it became clear that there really wasn't the kind of demand for the APU that AMD was playing up, AMD in its IR release stated that the markets where it most expected the APU to sell - China and Europe, had lukewarm reception of "Llano." This caused a fire-sale of AMD stock, when it saw a fall by almost 25 percent on extremely heavy trading volume. In the following quarter, on October 28, 2012, AMD announced a decline in its gross margins for Q3 2012 declined 31 percent QoQ, due in part to the $100 million inventory write-down, following which AMD stock declined another 17 percent in a flash.

    The Plantiff seeks to recover damages, who are represented by Robbins Geller, a firm that specializes in class action suits against companies that mislead their investors in a very big way. It would be interesting to see how this case plays out, given that readers of content on sites like ours most likely knew how fast AMD's K10 CPU and VLIW5 GPU architectures were (given that they had each driven AMD's product stack for several years), and what to expect from Llano, way back in 2011.

    Source: Robins Geller Rudman and Dowd LLP, Image Credit: BeHardware
  2. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,169 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    .......in a twisted positive note....i guess they feel now Amd is and will be making enough money to be sued. ...if this happens..... its back to -1 for amd again... just when things APPEARED to be heading in the right direction. :shadedshu:

    ....and just how inflated was the price of stock ......
  3. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,470 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,209
    Or maybe it just took a while to compile the evidence and dig deep enough into the financials. As usual AMDs hype machine banging the drum for the APU... Even when theres no market for them. APUs are great for htpcs and low to low/mid range gaming but an i3 4130 will still destroy it when it comes to processing power. An APU for mobile usage makes a lot more sense than in a desktop imo. Hybred crossfire has never really worked and we can only hold our breath to see if mantle really delivers what it promises
  4. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,437 (3.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,969
    Location:
    Mexico
    What to the who now? So shareholders are just going to sue when companies don't meet projected sales? Now if AMD indeed made up numbers out of thin air then yeah, that's fraud but failing short of an honest estimate isn't.

    Me smells lots of butthurt "investors" (there's always a risk involved with investments).
    Melvis says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. suraswami

    suraswami

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,077 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    794
    Location:
    Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
    Shows investors are dumb!
  6. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,470 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,209

    Maybe AMD shouldnt make promises it cant keep
  7. Jorge

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    709 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    75
    We're seeing a lot of fishing expeditions by investors in the past few years when their bets don't deliver the returns they hoped for. Virtually all SEC financial reports have disclaimers about performance past and future so these folks will have a tough sell to a judge or jury.

    AMD like most companies have no crystal ball. They can only state what they believe to be true at a specific point in time. Unless they knowingly misled investors this suit will be dismissed.
  8. fortiori New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013
    Messages:
    11 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    So long as they aren't obfuscating their books to the point that it is quite literally impossible to make heads or tails of their balance sheet (*ahem*), the investors have no case here. Guidance and expectations are squishy assurances at best and any investor that goes in thinking otherwise deserves what they get and probably needs to think long and hard about leaving the casino and never coming back. This lawsuit is a disgrace.

    That being said, AMD could stand to learn a little more about the merits of under promising and over delivering because their longstanding strategy of doing exactly the opposite is really starting to damage their credibility.
  9. esrever

    esrever

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2012
    Messages:
    59 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    AMD didn't make any promises to its share holders, it only gives its estimates. Maybe you shouldn't make statements you don't understand.
  10. damric

    damric

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    359 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    95
    I subpoena btarunr as a witness to give expert testimony.
  11. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,470 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,209
    In this case, estimates/promises their all the same and AMD didnt deliver - thats the bottom line
  12. v12dock

    v12dock

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,542 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    299
    Inflated the stock from $2.01 to $2.02 :laugh: Investors shouldn't look to AMD for making serious money
  13. dir_d

    dir_d

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    848 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Manteca, Ca
    Actually no they are not the same.
  14. brian111

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Messages:
    35 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Since when has that been grounds to sue? I don't know if this has any merit but I think they will have to show something more than that otherwise a lot more companies could be held liable.
  15. craigo

    craigo

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    652 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    63
    Location:
    Australia
    Microsoft surface....
  16. Dave65

    Dave65

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    129 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Location:
    Michigan
    You should understand what you are talking about before you go spouting off about something you have no clue about!
  17. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,470 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,209
    Actually i do, and its my own opinion so deal with it
  18. Xzibit

    Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,107 (1.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    253
    Not sure you do so deal with it.

    If you bothered reading it. Its a complaint by just 2 guys [Babak Hatamian and Lussu Dennj Salvatore]. There calling for more people to join in the suit.

    Reading more of the filing it just seams they bought at the wrong time. In the report they site that prior Quarter before they purchase stock AMD was up 8%.
  19. okidna

    okidna

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    470 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    341
    Location:
    Indonesia
  20. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,437 (3.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,969
    Location:
    Mexico
    Class suit trolls. Had forgotten about them.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  21. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,015 (11.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,405
    sure, making it into the two current gen, just laucnehd consoles is nothing to be happy about. someone just felt like suing to get rich quick.
    AsRock and Melvis say thanks.
  22. jigar2speed

    jigar2speed

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2012
    Messages:
    175 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    You might want to check this - http://in.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMD
  23. Recus

    Recus

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    500 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    165
    I feel bad for them. When you invest your money you want physical benefit. Not a empty PR slides.
  24. arterius2

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    493 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    103
    this is pretty hilarious, I almost spew coffee out of my nose when I read this. LOL
  25. john_

    john_

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2013
    Messages:
    190 (0.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Location:
    Athens, Greece
    For months now many "analysts" and others who are playing with the stock market are trying to short the stock and push it down to $2.5. This is nothing more than one more effort to push the stock price down. I am pretty sure many who where betting on AMD's disaster all losing money every day, especially now with the share price over $4.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page