1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD to Launch Low-power Phenom CPUs This Year

Discussion in 'News' started by malware, Jan 18, 2008.

  1. malware New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,476 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    AMD is lining up several energy efficient variants of its quad-core Phenom and dual-core Athlon CPUs to launch late this quarter or early in the second quarter of 2008. The low-power Phenom 9100e is scheduled for release in February or March this year and will come with a core frequency of 1.8GHz, DDR2 1066 memory controller and TDP of 65W. At the beginning of the second quarter, AMD will phase out the 9100e and launch the 9150e, which offers the same specifications, but will probably be based on the B3 stepping revision. In addition to the 9100e and 9150e, the company will also launch three dual-core low-power CPUs: Athlon 4850e (2.5GHz, 1MB L2 cache and DDR2 800), Athlon 4450e (2.3GHz, 1MB L2 cache and DDR2 800) and Athlon 4050e (2.1GHz, 1MB L2 cache and DDR 800). In other news, AMD is also set to launch two 45W single-core CPUs: Athlon BE-1640 with a core frequency of 2.7GHz and L2 cache of 512KB later this month, and will follow with the Athlon BE-1660 (2.8GHz, 512KB) in the second quarter. With low-power versions of AMD's next-generation CPU architecture showing up, the company will begin to phase out some previous CPUs including the dual-core Athlon X2 BE-2400, BE-2350 and BE-2300, and single-core Athlon BE-1620, Athlon 64 4000+ and 3800+. AMD will announce final order dates in the second quarter this year.

    Source: DigiTimes
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2008
  2. moto666 Guest

    Nice nice! But till the B3 stepping isn't out I don't by AMD personally!
    Don’t know about you people but I don't like the idea that something whit a bug is in My Rig!
    Sure just in serious situations! But anyway…
    My opinion!
     
  3. pimpiliosious

    pimpiliosious New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    5 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    seems interesting.
     
  4. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,489 (11.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,768
    this'd be great.. .except that a few days ago we saw intel is planning uber low wattage versions of their chips.

    I think they had some under 30W TDP.
     
  5. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    Yeah, but you can't compare them directly. Intel and AMD both use different testing/rating systems.
     
  6. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,848 (5.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,629
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    I am surprised they are investing in single cores as well, I am not suggesting there is not a market........OK I am! personally I cannot see great sales there, even OEM's seem to only use at least dual cores now and I am not sure if Vista Ultimate would like a single proccie that much.

    I think that just too many people worldwide are dual core now to go back to single......unless of course they were REALLY cheap. Apart from that it looks good, I am all for energy efficient.........HEAT is not my friend :shadedshu
     
  7. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    Many corporations still use single core for their workstations. My company just upgraded 6 months ago, and they're all single. Saving $5-10 by going single core doesn't seem like much, that is until you multiply it by 500 computers.
     
  8. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,848 (5.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,629
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    Well you know what they say?........."Time is money" :D
     
  9. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    i'd rather get a VIA
     
  10. pt

    pt not a suicide-bomber

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,981 (2.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Location:
    Portugal
    i've mount some rigs with sempron, wich are dirt cheap, so worth it
     
  11. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    Not where a business is concerned -- then it's just "money." :p
     
  12. peach1971

    peach1971 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    652 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    Germany
    Who wants a 1.8 GHz Phenom 65W when there´s already a 2.8 GHz Brisbane 65W. :cool:
    No one except OEMs focussing on their standard cheap marketing ticks ("Get the latest to keep in touch with society!") , right? ;)
     
  13. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    i want to see a 4ghz single core or somethin that makes there an actual point in getting it

    as for the low power quad in multi tasking 4X1.8ghz > 2X2.8ghz
     
  14. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,766 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    201
    Location:
    US
    if they can OC to 5GHz, then I might think about getting one :D
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page