1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD to Unleash R800, RV870, RV840 and RV810 Within 2009

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 26, 2009.

  1. locoty New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    61 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    yeah me too

    my 4850 is getting old

    i hope the price lower than 4850 at launch
  2. SonDa5

    SonDa5

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,645 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    40nm technology should be more affordable. I hope. :toast:

    I'm greatly enjoying 2 X fired HD4770s right now. When July comes I'll be very tempted to snag some of the newer 40nm flavors but will probably wait till I get 64 bit W7.

    I'm totally looking forward to these. :rockout:
  3. BradleyKZN

    BradleyKZN New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,148 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Location:
    South Africa
    Well, guess that 4890 isnt happening then
  4. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,256 (4.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,413
    youll probably go with the RV870
  5. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
    I think ATI is gonna get a big can o woop ass from Nvidia in the next matchup now that Nvidia has moved to MIMD, unless ATI did also, Nvidia's cards are gonna absolutely destroy them in folding.
  6. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,256 (4.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,413
    sounds like you dont like what you have.
  7. laszlo

    laszlo

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    891 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    66 feet from the ground
    who need dx11 card?

    all dx11 games will be compatible even with dx9 and 10 i'm sure
  8. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,256 (4.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,413
    yup and the market wont go anywhere just like it is now with DX10, DX10 seems to be dead
  9. laszlo

    laszlo

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    891 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    66 feet from the ground
    and why to wait and buy a dx11 card when the dx11 games will appear after 1-2 years and that card will be already "old" and again the need for upgrade...

    hardware is ahead of software always;all this is the war between manufacturer who want to show their superiority and people jump in buy but can they use it?
  10. Disruptor4

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    227 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    They need something to get the devs to bother writing code for DX11 to get it to take off.
  11. largon New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,778 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    32ROPs?
    I don't buy it.
    Games are becoming more and more shading and texturing reliant and impact of pixel fillrate and the rest of ROPs area of work is diminishing. Compare G200 to RV770, eg. RV770 has much more shading power but "only" 16RBEs with a fraction of z compare capabilities vs. G200's 32ROPs and huge z-rate. Yet, gaming performance... ;) And RV770's RBEs are already much beefier than those in RV670 for what comes to z-rate.

    Then again, AMD's RBEs are tiny compared to G200's and doubling them might be possible as crazy high speed GDDR5 (ie. 7Gbps) might allow an efficient use of them...
  12. Agility

    Agility

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,645 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    51
    Location:
    Singapore
    It would however be harder for the game devs that way. They've to make everything base on DX11 in terms of graphics and physics. And adapting it to DX10/9 would mean everything single one has to be adapted unlike current games. However, i also agree with you as that would be a TRUE DX11 game rather then games like STALKER Clear sky with DX10 as extra lightings (Not fully maximised).
  13. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    Show me a game on the market that was developed for DX10. I have yet to see one on the shelves. Everything out now is DX9 with a DX10 hook.
  14. Valdez

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    294 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Szekszárd, Hungary
    Stormrise.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
  15. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
  16. h3llb3nd4

    h3llb3nd4 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    3,323 (1.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    307
    Location:
    Durban, South Africa
    Cn't wait for benches to arrive:D
  17. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,847 (6.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,946
    Just because a game has DX9 rendering paths, that doesn't mean it isn't a true DX10 game. People don't say Half Life 2 isn't a true DX9 game because it has DX8 and DX7 rendering paths...
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  18. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    Well its not and I'm "people".
  19. johnnyfiive

    johnnyfiive

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,892 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    876
    Location:
    Tucson, AZ
    Doh? I can play in DX10 on enthusiast with my GTX 260 216. Awesome card. :rockout:. But you have a 3850 so thats not gonna cut it for enthusiast.
    But back to the topic. New cards from ATI, these should be interesting. Like always, we are all waiting to see what NVidia brings to the table. Hopefully both companies release cards that are right on par with each other so no price inflation happens. Made me laugh when the G200 series cards came out, then the RV770 based cards came out from ATI and NVidia dropped the prices on the G200's like it was diseased, lol.
    Thanks ATI, thats how my GTX 260 became affordable!
    Last edited: May 27, 2009
  20. Shadin

    Shadin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    53 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Actually, that's exactly what it means. A true DX10 game would require DX10 to run. All we've had so far are DX9-based engine games with some DX10 optional features hacked in, because the install base for Windows XP is too massive for a developer to make a game Vista/7 only.

    I read an interesting article with Carmack awhile back where he stated from a business standpoint, it only became economically feasible to drop all support for Windows 98 in 2006, but that didn't limit them in gaming engines because Win98 could use DirectX 9. Even if the same model holds exact (could be better, or it could be worse because WinXP had five years to proliferate the market vs three years for Win98), then game developers will need to continue to support Windows XP through 2012, meaning that every game that comes out will need to be written for DirectX 9 with optional DX10/11 effects hacked into the engine.

    Microsoft fucked up hard when they decided to not release DX10 on XP, thinking that would surely drive a massive upgrade to Vista.
    Assimilator says thanks.
  21. Valdez

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    294 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Szekszárd, Hungary
    Stormrise PC is a full dx10 game, it has no dx9 renderpath and requires vista (sp1) to run.

    For consoles they made a dx9 renderpath, but on PC it is the first dx10.x only development.


    Anyway it is a crappy game :D
  22. Valdez

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    294 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Szekszárd, Hungary
    Or, first they make the dx10/11 code, after that, they make the dx9 code (if i'm correct, stormrise was written this way).
  23. Shadin

    Shadin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    53 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    I was under the impression that Stormrise was a console game primarily that they ported to PC using only the DX10 API (aka, lazy and financially suicidal in the current market). Of course then they gave interviews and hyped it all up.
  24. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
    Largon is right, games have taken a turn and are favoring advanced shading techniques and using physics more and more instead of increasing the numbers of pixels on screen, and the reason is that developers know their is a limit to how many rops a card can have because the more rops you have the more memory peices you need on the board with current architectures.

    the best example of this is cryostasis, its a very good looking game that is a bitch to run because it uses many shading techniques ontop of physics.
  25. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,847 (6.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,946
    That is not what it means, it is entirely possible to write a game engine for DX10 or DX9 or whatever, then put in rendering paths for lower DX versions. Just because a game has a lower DX version compatibility, that doesn't mean it wasn't written for the higher DX versions first.

    It is all a matter of how the game developer writes the game, they can write it for DX10 then take features out to make it work with DX9, or they can write it for DX9 and add in features for DX10.

    In the case of Half Life 2(or the source engine) it is a true DX9 engine, written for DX9 with features disabled in the DX8/7 rendering paths.

    So I say again, just because a game has rendering paths for lower DX versions, that doesn't mean it isn't a true DX10/11 game.
    phanbuey says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page