1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Unveils New Embedded G-Series System-on-Chip

Discussion in 'News' started by Cristian_25H, Apr 23, 2013.

  1. Cristian_25H

    Cristian_25H News Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,621 (4.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,164
    Location:
    Still on the East Side
    AMD today announced the new AMD Embedded G-Series System-on-Chip (SOC) platform, a single-chip solution based on the AMD next-generation "Jaguar" CPU architecture and AMD Radeon 8000 Series graphics. The new AMD Embedded G-Series SOC platform further signifies a strategic push to focus on high-growth markets outside the PC industry, with an emphasis on embedded systems. The announcement was made at this year's DESIGN West expo.

    Embedded systems are increasingly driving intelligence into new areas of our lives, from smart TVs and set-top boxes to interactive digital signage and informational kiosks. This supports greater productivity and connectivity and is expected to be a strong driver for Surround Computing, an area of substantial growth in the computing industry. Among the forces that are enabling this next-generation computing era are single-chip, SOC solutions that offer smaller size, higher performance and more energy-efficient processors.

    The AMD Embedded G-Series SOC platform sets the new bar for SOC design, offering up to 113 percent improved CPU performance compared to the prior generation AMD Embedded G-Series APU, and up to a 125 percent advantage compared to the Intel Atom when running multiple industry-standard compute intensive benchmarks. For embedded applications, the new platform also includes support for DirectX 11.1, OpenGL 4.2x and OpenCL 1.22 that enables parallel processing and high-performance graphics processing, yielding up to a 20 percent graphics improvement over the previous AMD Embedded G-Series APU and greater than 5x advantage over Intel Atom when running multiple industry-standard graphics-intensive benchmarks.

    "We have built a treasure trove of industry-leading IP in processors, graphics and multimedia along with the infrastructure to combine these building blocks into unsurpassed embedded SOC solutions," said Arun Iyengar, vice president and general manager, AMD Embedded Solutions. "With a 33 percent smaller footprint, low power consumption and exceptional performance, the new AMD Embedded G-Series SOC sets the bar for content-rich multimedia and traditional workload processing that is ideal for a broad variety of embedded applications."

    The new processor family offers superior performance per watt in the low-power x86-compatible product category with 9W - 25W options5. It includes:
    ● enterprise-class Error-Correction Code (ECC) memory support;
    ● industrial temperature range of -40°C to +85°C and available with dual or quad-core CPUs;
    ● discrete-class AMD Radeon GPU;
    ● I/O controller.

    The AMD Embedded G-Series SOC combines dedicated resources that enable exceptional performance with shared resources to help reduce power consumption and die space, and provides developers the flexibility to leverage the same board design and software stack for a variety of applications due to the scalability of the new SOC design. The discrete-class graphics integrated into the AMD Embedded G-Series SOC power applications that previously required a separate graphics processor, while the addition of new CPU architecture for the Embedded G-Series SOC platform allows deeply embedded or "headless" systems, which are used in environments without a screen, monitor or input device and do not require a graphics solution.

    "As the Internet of Things permeates every aspect of our life from work to home and everything where in between, devices require high performance, I/O connectivity and energy efficiency in smaller packages," said Colin Barnden, principal analyst, Semicast Research. "With this new AMD SOC design, the AMD Embedded G-Series platform offers the perfect mix of high performance, a small footprint, low energy use and full I/O integration to enable smaller form-factor embedded designs, cool and efficient operation, and simplified build requirements. AMD has leapfrogged the competition by combining the power of an x86 CPU and the performance of AMD Radeon graphics with the I/O interconnect all on a single die."

    The AMD Embedded G-Series SOC supports Windows Embedded 8 and Linux, and is designed for myriad embedded applications including industrial control and automation, digital signage, electronic gaming systems, SMB storage, IP-TV, medical and network appliances, set-top boxes and more. AMD will ship the AMD G-Series SOC platform with general availability in the second quarter of 2013, followed by a comprehensive ecosystem of industry-leading embedded solution providers supporting and/or announcing market-ready products powered by the AMD Embedded G-Series SOC.

    Developer Support and Product Features
    Developers working with the AMD Embedded G-Series SOC can implement remote management, virtualization and security capabilities to help reduce deployment costs and increase security and reliability of their AMD Embedded G-Series SOC-based platform through:
    ● AMD DAS 1.0 featuring DASH 1.1;
    ● AMD Virtualization technology;
    ● Trusted Platform Module (TPM) 1.2 support.

    Next-generation CPU core
    ● Next-generation "Jaguar" core with innovative, new shared L2 Cache
    ● Enterprise-class feature of ECC and fast memory support

    Excellent AMD Radeon graphics performance-per-watt
    ● Enhanced Universal Video Decode (UVD) 3 hardware acceleration (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, etc.) and new video encode capability not available in previous AMD Embedded G-Series APU
    ● Power efficiency enhancement with clock gating to contribute to overall lower power consumption

    Advanced GPU enables parallel processing and high-performance graphics
    ● Heterogeneous computing for industrial control and automation, communications and other processor heavy applications. OpenCL enables CPU and GPU parallel processing, which benefits applications development in these areas
    ● Graphics (DirectX 11, OpenGL) and dual independent display; high-resolution support for a superb visual experience
    ● Expanded software development options and extended application lifetime with advanced graphics APIs

    Ideal platform for low-power and high-performance designs
    ● For Industrial Control and Automation: low-power and heterogeneous computing advantage enabled by the integrated GPU deliver more than 150 GFLOPS of compute performance over and above the compute capability of the x86 CPU cores6
    ● For Digital Signage: eye-catching, high-definition multimedia content delivery connected through a variety of display technologies (DP, HDMI, VGA, LVDS)
    ● For Electronic Gaming Machines: dedicated hardware acceleration engines for video decode (UVD) and encode (VCE) as well as digital content management (SAMU)
    ● For SMB storage: high-performance SOC in a small form factor with a myriad of integrated USB and SATA I/O enables a fanless design, reducing system cost

    Models and pricing
    Models available at launch include:
    ● GX-420CA SOC with AMD Radeon HD 8400E Graphics
    Quad-core, 25 W TDP, CPU freq. 2.0 GHz, GPU freq. 600 MHz
    ● GX-415GA SOC with AMD Radeon HD 8330E Graphics
    Quad-core, 15 W TDP, CPU freq. 1.50 GHz, GPU freq. 500 MHz
    ● GX-217GA SOC with AMD Radeon HD 8280E Graphics
    Dual-core, 15 W TDP, CPU freq. 1.65 GHz, GPU freq. 450 MHz
    ● GX-210HA SOC with AMD Radeon HD 8210E Graphics
    Dual-core, 9 W TDP, CPU freq. 1.0 GHz, GPU freq. 300 MHz
    ● GX-416RA SOC
    Quad-Core, 15 W, CPU Freq. 1.6 GHz, No GPU

    Pricing ranges from $49 - $72 for the SKUs.
     
  2. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,805 (4.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,068
    Holy Mother of price!
    and lets see some nice x86 tablets soon!! atom tablets are worse than android ones!
     
  3. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,893 (0.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    380
    Location:
    Singapore
  4. Jorge

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    753 (1.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    Yup AMD has a winner with these SoCs, IMO. They have a broad market application so it should generate a nice chunk of change for AMD along with all the other goodies they have coming like Rickland, Kaveri and Steamroller to mention just a few.

    Unless TSMC is producing these, this migh be the first 28nm node from GloFo?
     
  5. Chevalr1c

    Chevalr1c

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,246 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,424
    Location:
    NL, Europe
    How good would these be for dedicated BOINC machines? Just wondering...

    And obviously these would make good file servers for networks that do not need a powerful server but are too demanding for Atom based HW, as it seems to me.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,786 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,344
    Please someone make nanoITX boards that end users actually can buy. Pleasepleaseplease.
     
    xorbe, sparkyar, Chevalr1c and 3 others say thanks.
  7. Chevalr1c

    Chevalr1c

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,246 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,424
    Location:
    NL, Europe
    ^This.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,558 (3.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,126
    Location:
    Mexico
    Hello new server :)
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,540 (3.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,693
    The jaguar cores look promising but in an apu format I think could be quite a treat for the low power market.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  10. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,462 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,188
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    AMD has already said that Jaguar is basically the bobcat core with another stage in the pipeline. Jaguar is not like bulldozer and I just looked through the link you posted and it says nothing about modules. I think you need to know what you're reading before you start spreading false information.

    Jaguar does not use modules, it has real cores, as in the FPU is not shared. The pipeline for a BD/PD based chip is also twice as long as Jaguar.
    My thoughts exactly. I need a better gateway server then a 960t. :p
     
    xorbe says thanks.
  11. alwayssts

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    371 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    You guys didn't post the picture...and the interesting part.

    [​IMG]

    X is x86...because new chips below 15w (the successors to the gap Temash, the low-voltage version of this chip) are going to use ARM cores. Yessir...Tegra is going to have a playmate.
     
  12. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,462 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,188
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Source? This if the first time I've heard this and I would like some hard evidence before accepting such a claim.
    Not to say this wouldn't be awesome but it's hard to believe.
     
    james888 says thanks.
  13. alwayssts

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    371 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
  14. Mathragh

    Mathragh

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,095 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    300
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    So this truly is a single chip doing everything from central processing to USB port control?

    awesome
     
  15. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,462 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,188
    Location:
    Concord, NH
  16. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,805 (4.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,068
    i doubt AMD will go to ARM because their x86 based low power SoCs are already going to have similar wattage and cost the same as any ARM based SoC (ie 50-100$)

    why would they ditch the x86 advantages just to enter the android market? that would make for a very foolish move as there are already well established companies in that market now.
     
  17. Mathragh

    Mathragh

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,095 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    300
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Because at the moment, they apparently cannot scale lower than 9Watts with their x86 cores, even if they've only got two out of four activated. Using ARM cores instead of x86 while keeping the rest the same will probably allow them to go even lower than 9Watts, which is essential for things like tablets and phones, which cannot support a 9Watt TDP.
     
    alwayssts says thanks.
  18. alwayssts

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    371 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Pretty sure when an AMD rep gives specifics of '< 3w and ARM cores' it's very much figured out and on the roadmap.

    Also, exactly what Mathragh just said.
     
  19. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,462 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,188
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    None of this gives me any evidence that they're moving forward with this though. Everything I've read is speculation, nothing concrete.
     
  20. Mathragh

    Mathragh

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,095 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    300
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    That is indeed a good point. However, they did announce that they were going for a more modular design, and they already have a licence on ARM cores. While the move would certainly seem to be possible, and make sense, we indeed don't have any proof supporting it yet.
     
    Aquinus says thanks.
  21. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,462 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,188
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Do they? When did this happen?
     
  22. alwayssts

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    371 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    2011...:toast:
     
  23. Mathragh

    Mathragh

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,095 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    300
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I suppose this is a good read:)

    Edit: not exactly up to date anymore, but still.
     
  24. alwayssts

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    371 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Mathragh says thanks.
  25. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,419 (1.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,258
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    ^This.

    ^This * 11
     
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page