1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Antivirus advice needed

Discussion in 'General Software' started by Krazy Owl, Dec 31, 2012.

  1. Krazy Owl

    Krazy Owl New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    900 (0.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    77
    Location:
    Montreal
    Norton internet security 2001 or Kaspersky 2011 ?
    why also?

    I have both keys so i can choose.

    thx
     
  2. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,556 (11.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,828
    kaspersky.

    google for why, no one ever reccomends nortons.
     
  3. claylomax

    claylomax

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,621 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    268
    Location:
    London
    Anything that is not Norton.
     
  4. natr0n

    natr0n

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    2,056 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,089
    The best thing norton makes is there norton removal tool.
     
    _Zod_ and Melvis say thanks.
  5. Guitarrassdeamor

    Guitarrassdeamor

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,078 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    309
    Location:
    NC
    Kaspersky.
     
  6. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,774 (1.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,071
    Definitely Kaspersky.
     
  7. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,915 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,435
    Has something happened to Norton recently? Because last time I tried it, in 2011 I think, it was both light and pretty decent. It didn't use more resources than MSE.
     
  8. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,916 (4.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,121
    neither. norton is well, bad. and kaspersky is too annyoying.

    Eset. all the wise people use eset.
     
  9. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,210 (6.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,383
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Microsoft Security Essentials and Malwarebytes is all you will ever need. But out of those too. Kaspersky for sure. Norton is a fail these days.
     
  10. silkstone

    silkstone

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,900 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    508
    Kaspersky's AV is pretty good. The Internet Security Suite is far too annoying though. I hate the firewall on that thing.
     
  11. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,915 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,435
    Why is Norton "fail"?
     
  12. claylomax

    claylomax

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,621 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    268
    Location:
    London
    Well I haven't used it for ages, but I remember that it was impossible to uninstall back in the day.
     
  13. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,556 (11.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,828
    kaspersky only annoys people because they set it to 'ask me EVERYTHING' mode, when it literally means everything. leave it on the default settings and its just like every other AV + firewall combo out there.

    nortons annoys people because it slows peoples systems more than the malware, and its even more annnoying.
     
  14. Triprift

    Triprift

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    7,185 (2.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    915
    Location:
    Adelaide Australia
    I am assuming that the Norton one is actually 2011 not 2001? I would say Kaspersky only because i have been using it for years and have found it reasonably reliable. Cant really comment on Norton as i have never used it. Dl Malwarebytes wich will work happily alongside wich one you choose.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2012
  15. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,915 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,435
    Ahh so you don't know what you're talking about then.

    This was true until years ago. I tried it last year and it used pretty much exactly as much resources as MSE and didn't slow anything down. I quite liked it actually.
     
  16. claylomax

    claylomax

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,621 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    268
    Location:
    London
    I do; I used it, didn't like it and don't recommend it like most on this thread.
     
  17. JNUKZ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    185 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Portugal
    Always used Norton and never had any problems with it. It does the job very well.
     
  18. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,915 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,435
    Thats like recommend against Windows 7 because you didnt like windows ME. Software changes.
     
  19. Proedros

    Proedros New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    13 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    If you use kaspersky in win7 use kis 2012 its faster. For win8 kis 2013.And of course kis is better than norton.
     
  20. sttubs

    sttubs

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    649 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    97
    I've been quite happy with Norton Internet Security 2012. It has saved my butt a few times, especially on those fake antiviruses. No slow downs & everything runs smoothly during scans too.
     
  21. Guitarrassdeamor

    Guitarrassdeamor

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,078 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    309
    Location:
    NC
    Norton has gotten a lot better however because of its previous track record I'm still not a fan. I personally like the MSE and MBAM combo overall. Free for the AV and $25 for MBAM (if you want the pro version, which $25 one time isn't bad and I'm finally going to buy it after getting years of use out of it on countless computers).
     
  22. fasteddy2020

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    39 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Just South of The Great White North
    Best thing to do is try each for their respective trial period. No two systems are alike and one may work better than another for your setup. I have used both extensively along with about a dozen others and chose the one I liked and worked for my setup. Your keys, if never registered, will work for the latest version of either. Best advice anyone can give is try them yourself.
     
  23. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,295 (7.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,780
    Last month Norton had a higher detection rate than Kapersky. Norton 360 is honestly a very good anti-virus today. This isnt 2001 anymore people. Get over it.

    You can't go wrong with Norton or Kapersky honestly. However even Auslogics makes a decent antivirus today. HOWEVER none of them CLEAN UP a computer better then Malwarebytes. It baffles even professional testers how well Malwarebytes cleans up infections. The problem with Malwarebytes is it doesnt scan archives and its crap at picking up root infections so don't use it as a soul scanner. Just a passive scanner.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2013
  24. Widjaja

    Widjaja

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,819 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    639
    Location:
    Wangas, New Zealand
    Only issue I have with is the amount of people who appear to be suckered in to auto renewal.
    Norton was a resource hog in the past but I don't know about now.
    Never had a chance to use Kaspersky but it appears to be a useful AV.

    I personally use MSE.
    I don;t thin I go to enough sites to get malware.
    Used to us AVG but that is system heavy now and found it gave me far too many false positives.
     
  25. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,556 (11.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,828
    detection rate doesnt mean as much as people think it does.


    who gives a crap if an AV can detect the virus, if it cant clean it off fully and leave you with a working OS afterwards?
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page