1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Apple’s DRM-free music has a twist

Discussion in 'News' started by Jimmy 2004, Jun 1, 2007.

  1. Jimmy 2004

    Jimmy 2004 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2005
    Messages:
    5,491 (1.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    267
    Location:
    England
    Now that Apple has finally led the way and launched its DRM-free downloads for EMI music, you could be forgiven for thinking music fans should be happy. Unfortunately, Apple has removed the protection only to give downloaders another surprise: the tracks still contain data about who bought them. Apple launched the DRM-free service two days ago, which allows iTunes users to download higher quality music without DRM-protection (the technology that prevents music from being played on certain devices in an attempt to combat file sharing) for a higher price of $1.29. However, even tracks without any DRM have the user’s account information, including the buyer’s email address, embedded into them. Apple hasn’t given any comment yet, but music fans fear that Apple is not respecting their privacy and are worried it could be used to identify them if the songs end up on file sharing sites. Obviously this would be useful to prevent illegal sharing, but if the data could be easily spoofed then it may lead to people being wrongly accused of sharing music.

    Source: BBC News
  2. rhythmeister New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    987 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    Belfast...N. Ireland mate!
    Idiots, they need a good slap the lot of them. It's called file sharing not stealing, apple you muppets!
  3. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Yeah, they only call it that so as to lessen the naming burden on the pirates. If you share files, chances are, its an illegal file sharing. Otherwise, the whole industry, music and movies, wouldnt even care.


    I dont see this as being really a bad thing, only those who may pirate the music (though I dont see anyone paying $1.29 a song and giving it away for free, just doesnt make sense) could complain.
  4. Bob The Fish New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    121 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton Alberta Canada
    I new it would have a catch.
  5. Benpi New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    415 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    The other catch is, the files are .M4A files. If your MP3 player doesn't accept AAC files, then it DEFINATELY won't accept .M4A files. This whole Plus DRM-free program is shit. If it sold high res .MP3 files, that'd be a different story. Amazon FTW!
  6. Nemesis881 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Messages:
    692 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    Dawsonville, GA
    Ipods suck, Itunes suck, APPLE SUCKS!!! hahaha

    Seriously though, if you're gonna pay $1.29 a song, you should be able to do what you want with it.
  7. pnice New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    6 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Jhymm Anybody?
  8. GJSNeptune

    GJSNeptune New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,571 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    Ohio
    High bitrate mp3s are still compressed. ;)

    If you want higher quality, you'll need to look to another format.
  9. GJSNeptune

    GJSNeptune New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,571 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    Ohio
    Bandwagon or actual experience? You don't need iTunes for an iPod, so hating one because of the other is silly.
  10. d44ve New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,521 (0.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    309

    Shht, I love my ipod and I do not use Itunes.
  11. GJSNeptune

    GJSNeptune New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,571 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ditto.
  12. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,114 (2.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    When will they learn that people will only be want to pirate music more if they make it harder to own legal music...:shadedshu .
  13. Dippyskoodlez New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,061 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    230
    Location:
    Ohio
    srsly, people act like the ITMS is already hard to bypass the drm.

    If this is a simple M4a... and not DRM protected... how long do you think it'll take for a program to come out that just strips the information out and converts it to whatever you want? :rolleyes:


    Think smarter not harder people, come on.
  14. Benpi New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    415 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3

    Yes. So are AACs, WMAs ATRACs, WAVs etc.etc.etc. 192kb/s MP3s sound great. A 192kb/s MP3 is worth more than a 128kb/s DRMd AAC or AAC with your name imprinted on it.
  15. XooM New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    479 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Location:
    Close to FrozenCPU.com
    FLAC for lossless plz. ogg vorbis for lossy. Oh, and iTunes sucks because its clumsy, awkward, and limiting. iPods suck because they're of a mediocre build quality and scratch like a mofo, but with rockbox are a moderately respectable player. apple is not a lousy company, though i dislike their advertising and loathe their obnoxiously loud fanbase.
  16. wazzledoozle

    wazzledoozle New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,414 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Location:
    Seattle
    These (sort of) DRM-Less AAC files are 256kbps.
    AAC and WMA are far superior codecs to MP3, which has long outlived its time.

    The industry just needs to get together on a modern, standardized, and open codec. AAC is a good start, the Zune and 360 play it along with iPod hardware. But it still has licensing fees...
    OGG is alright. I havent used it much, but it isn't going to be adopted by any major music store because of its open source nature; hectic and always changing.

    Personally, I rip cd's to FLAC and then transcode that to 128kbps AAC for my ipod.
  17. GJSNeptune

    GJSNeptune New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,571 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    Ohio
    WAVs are typically uncompressed. Just sayin', someday there'll be a FLAC music service or something. :D

    Someday...when everyone has at least 1TB. :laugh:
  18. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,777
    Agreed, 100%. I no longer use mp3's myself. I hate them. FLAC and AAC, FTW!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page