1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Asetek Readies, Demonstrates Water Cooling Solution for GTX 580

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 25, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,371 (11.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,607
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Water-cooling solution brand Asetek, which is popular with the OEMs, demonstrated a prototype GPU water-cooling solution for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580. The prototype uses an off-the-shelf GTX 580 card branded by PNY (doesn't necessarily mean that Asetek is designing this for PNY). The cooler could be to be a pre-assembled GPU water block loop that replaces the aluminum channel heatsink in the reference NVIDIA cooler. The NVIDIA reference blower is retained to cool other components such as memory and VRM, probably at low speeds.

    Asetek put its GTX 580 prototype to test, by overclocking the PNY GTX 580 Enthusiast Edition to 995 MHz core, 1846 MHz CUDA cores, and 1100 MHz (4.40 GHz effective) memory. At these speeds, the GPU was able to score 1285 points at average framerate of 51 FPS in Unigine Heaven 2.0 benchmark. Watch the video embedded after the break for details.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    damric and Jack Doph say thanks.
  2. arnoo1

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    744 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    124
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Thats pretty darn good! But a little late, and i think it's going to be expensive, if i want a highly oc'ed gtx580 than i would go for a custom wc loop
  3. AMD'ers

    AMD'ers New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    17 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Garut, West Java
    this is amazing . i like reference design of Geforce GTX 580/570 and i dont wanna change that . this gonna be solution cooling for those card . :D
  4. t77snapshot

    t77snapshot

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,208 (2.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,736
    Location:
    S.Cali
    Idk it's hard to believe they got over a 20c (over 30c @stock speeds) difference with that tiny radiator, plus these temps were based on the ambient room temps since it was on a bench and not in a warm case with the surrounding hardware.:rolleyes:
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. Chaitanya

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    389 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    Pune
    If someone has the 2/3 of these video cards then this cooling system is useless. As most cases wont accept 2/3 independent 120mm rads. I would better stick with a Koolance/Danger Den blocks for cooling my GPUs.:p
  6. random

    random

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,042 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    686
    Waste of time imo, either go with real water or get the accelero extreme plus. This would take up too much room in a case.
  7. Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,177 (1.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    would really depend on the price. if its priced the same as a gpu block, id say its good. Its like slapping an h50 on your gpu (in which H50 was doing ok for a cpu cooler). Would definitely be the best gpu cooler with larger surface to cool.
  8. Trackr New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    265 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Does it work on a GTX 480.....?
  9. cheesy999

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    3,905 (2.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    576
    Location:
    UK
    disappointing, so close to a 1000 but they didn't push for 5 more mhz

    i'd love too see w1z review this

    ty_ger says thanks.
  10. Flibolito

    Flibolito

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    728 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    84
    those shader speeds dont add up. 995 core on a fermi would equal 1990MHz shader domain or am i missing something.
  11. Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,177 (1.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    Maybe they mean 925 instead of 995? Even so, it shouldve been 923 :D
  12. Flibolito

    Flibolito

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    728 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    84
    yeah i think 995 is a error probably. with good cooling a high binned chip should be able to hit that speed if the power protection doesn't interfere.
  13. DarkMatter75 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    13 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    It had more sense what they'd presented back in '08 using a 8800GTX...

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    And after that, they used it on the HP Blackbird:

    [​IMG]

    This is another (old) new thing for Corsair's "innovative" product line.:D
    bear jesus says thanks.
  14. Flibolito

    Flibolito

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    728 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    84
    is it me or do the radiators look way too weak to properly cool a high powered system.
  15. silkstone

    silkstone

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,878 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    499
    Hmmm, so this is a H50 for your GPU?
    Not a bad idea, i can imagine a lot of people who want to branch out into watercooling, but don't have the time/motivation would be interested in this... But then again, i bought a CM Aquagate viva.. it was on offer for about $40 and was the worst purchase i ever made :(
  16. asetek_stu New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Hey guys,

    Just wanted to let you know that I am available to answer any questions =)

    Cheers,
    Stu
  17. asetek_stu New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Oh and yes he mistyped up above. This was overclocked to 955 with the liquid cooler. =)

    This will come preattached to the card which allows us to maintain a warranty.

    All testing was done according to OFFICIAL NVIDIA testing specs for graphics cards. The use of an open bench for graphics qualification is part of that official NVIDIA test spec.

    Cheers!
    Stu
  18. Arctucas

    Arctucas

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,764 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    290
    @asetek_stu,

    What specifically are the settings you used in Heaven?

    Thanks.
  19. damric

    damric

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    367 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    95
    I want one for my 6850's.
  20. Wastedslayer

    Wastedslayer

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    832 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    what he said....
  21. ty_ger

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    211 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    Pacific Coast
    :laugh::toast:
  22. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    Don't suppose the block it's self has cooling fins on it?

    Would make sense since you have air blowing over it any-ways.
  23. asetek_stu New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    I used default settings with AA turned up to 8x =)
  24. Arctucas

    Arctucas

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,764 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    290
    OK, but the question I am asking is; what are the default settings?

    Renderer= DX9, DX10, or DX11?

    Mode= Resolution and Windowed or Fullscreen? (8X Anti-Aliasing)

    Shaders=?

    Textures=?

    Anisotropy=?

    Tessellation=?

    I presume you saved the results or took a screenshot?

    Thanks.
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2011
  25. bear jesus

    bear jesus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    Location:
    Britland
    I want to see what's under the shroud, I love the idea of the sealed loop on the core with heat pipes with a smallish heatsink/cooling plate for the VRM and RAM as shown here.
    [​IMG]

    Depending how it performed in reviews and of course what card the cooler is on i would take it over the stock cooler and most after market coolers.

    It reminds me of wishing i could afford the sapphire toxic x1950xtx :laugh:
    [​IMG]

    *edit*
    Hmmmm that gives me an idea, hey asetek stu, you should get someone to contact sapphire and convince them to partner up with asetek for the next generation of toxic cards :D
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2011

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page