1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASRock Shows Off Z87-Extreme11/ac Build with 22 SSDs

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jun 4, 2013.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,552 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,644
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    ASRock Z87-Extreme11/ac motherboard can connect to no less than 22 drives over its six SATA 6 Gb/s, and sixteen SAS3 ports, so why not show it off? It's just that ASRock chose 22 Plextor M5 Pro SSDs, which make for a creepy cemetery-like sight. Sadly, they couldn't give us performance numbers because the 22 drives aren't exactly striped across in any RAID configuration, but at least you know you can take something like this to your next Left4Dead LAN, and pull crowds. It's not just the drives, ASRock also fitted the board with four Radeon HD 7970 cards in CrossFireX, maxed out the memory, and wired the board to its Wi-SD box accessory, a 3.5-inch front-panel that features the board's WiFi+Bluetooth antenna, a couple of USB 3.0 ports, and a multi-format card reader.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,414 (3.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,560
    Raid 0 needed
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. boogerlad

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    219 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    What is the purpose of this? Everything in this system is so bandwidth constrained.
     
  4. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,275 (6.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,083
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    I spy a DMI bottleneck with all those SSDs.
     
  5. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,214 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    . Sadly, they couldn't give us performance numbers because the 22 drives aren't exactly striped across in any RAID configuration,

    :shadedshu

    I was about to get excited and whip out Mr. Visa..........
     
  6. silkstone

    silkstone

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,882 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    499
    12 TB of SSDs in Raid 0 would be pretty sweet.
     
  7. adulaamin

    adulaamin

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Messages:
    686 (0.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    245
    Location:
    Baguio City, Philippines
    Look at all them SATA ports! :eek:
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. sanadanosa

    sanadanosa

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    125 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Location:
    Semarang, Indonesia
    is this LSI thing like on Z77 Extreme11? I heard that thing doesn't work quite well.
     
  9. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,275 (6.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,083
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    There comes a point where more bandwidth on mass storage won't benefit you because you'll be waiting on the CPU most of the time like we already do now. The speed up from adding any additional SSDs is pretty low. It's starts high with one because regular hard drives are relatively slow.

    Lets say you need to read a 400MB file and process it. The CPU takes 3 seconds to process this said data (which will remain constant between all the cases). On a regular hard drive with say 100MB/s of bandwidth (we're assuming sequential reads here,) we'll spend 4 seconds reading the file and 3 seconds processioning it totaling 7 seconds. If we take a SATA3 SSD that can sustain 500MB/s, we will read that file in 0.8 seconds, leaving us with 3.8 seconds to run.

    That's a nice speed up, it now takes half the time to run, but now we want to RAID it and double our bandwidth. So we have 1000MB/s, which takes 0.4 seconds to read the file, and it takes 3.4 seconds versus 3.8 seconds with just one SSD. In most cases, I/O is kept to a minimum unless its needed and very quickly do you reach a point of diminishing returns, but you see what I mean when there comes a point where it's just useless for the cost?

    It doesn't do RAID-5 which is what turns me off.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2013
    sanadanosa and silkstone say thanks.
  10. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,175 (2.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    u tell me there no bottlenick with this
     
  11. AsRock

    AsRock TPU addict

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    10,901 (4.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,673
    Location:
    US
    You be better of with more than one array with less drives.

    Shii that kills part of the reason i would get it.. As if i was going run a bunch of SSD's HDD's at least one array would be Raid 5..
     
  12. Hilux SSRG

    Hilux SSRG

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    949 (1.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    151
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    Fitting graveyard picture, wonder how long they will last.
     
  13. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,275 (6.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,083
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    I've been pretty happy with my 2x120GB SSDs and 3x1TB in RAID-5. It's a pretty nice balance but sometimes the SSDs feel a bit small, even with 240GB.

    It's a big reason why the Extreme11 turned me off.
     
  14. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    844 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Location:
    Look behind you!!
    :twitch:
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page