1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASRock X99 Extreme4 is World's First Windows 8.1-Certified X99-Based Motherboard

Discussion in 'News' started by Cristian_25H, Aug 1, 2014.

  1. Cristian_25H

    Cristian_25H News Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,584 (4.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,161
    Location:
    Still on the East Side
    Even though nothing much about ASRock's next generation Intel X99 series motherboards can be revealed yet, we simply can't restrain ourselves from spilling out the good news that ASRock's X99 Extreme4 is the world's first Intel X99 chipset based motherboard to pass Windows 8.1 hardware certification. So, yeah, users may be ensured that ASRock's X99 Extreme4 will support the latest operating system from Microsoft without any problems, and bear in mind that it's coming to you real soon! Kudos to ASRock again!

    Not only focusing on developing the most advanced hardware technology, ASRock also keen on bringing the latest software applications to PC users. ASRock pioneers in Windows 8.1 logo submission, and the company's offerings are the best in the overall market. So, why settle for second best? Be the first to lay your hands on the X99 Series computers with ASRock!

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,648 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    943
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Still unsure if i should go with the 3rd gen Socket 2011 platform and X99 chipset or wait for Skylake and whatever chipset it comes with it. X99 certainly looks promising in a way, though i assume it will be a dead platform from the get go like it was LGA1366 back then.

    I mean, 6 cores, 12 threads, very high stock clocks etc, do want that. I'm kinda tired of all the same quad cores that we had for ages.
     
  3. Ferrum Master

    Ferrum Master

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    671 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    151
    Location:
    Rīga
    LGA1366 wasn't a dead platform... X series are not meant for casual people as such.
     
  4. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,198 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    838
    I'm happy for this certification. Now i can buy this with a CPU and enjoy.

    ....


    :|
     
  5. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    756 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    79
    LGA1366 was actually quite popular and well received. It was before the split between enthusiast / pro-sumer platforms like the LGA2011 / X79 / C600 series and consumer level platforms,...

    I'm glad to see X99 hardware like this getting certified. It looks like things are on schedule for a late 3rd quarter or early 4th quarter release. I think I can go for an X99 LGA2011-3 platform assuming the entry level chip / processor is indeed 6 cores / 12 threads for ~$300 USD,....with the expected performance advantage.
     
  6. utengineer

    utengineer

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    41 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14
    Location:
    Austin, TX USA
    I see M.2 and SATA express. I am eager to see how MB OEMs will implement both on x99 with so many PCIe lanes available.
     
  7. visi1617

    visi1617

    Joined:
    May 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    nice of them, but it is pretty ironic that the PDF is being opened in a Windows XP machine
     
  8. Hood

    Hood

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    817 (1.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    246
    Oh crap, I just did the whole Z97/Devil's Canyon upgrade, now here comes the new HEDT platform, looking very tempting. All those PCIe lanes will be useful for the drives that are soon to arrive using x4 and x8 lanes, hopefully no longer requiring a second mortgage as they become more common. Storage I/O is still the bottleneck of modern systems, and it's the final frontier for massive speed improvements (memory and CPU being so fast already that only incremental speed bumps are possible). M.2 PCIe x 2 drives like the Plextor M6e are not good even as a temporary solution - mine is actually a bit slower than my 840 Pro in real world usage (the 4k reads and writes typically performed by the OS and programs). The slot takes a latency hit because of it's path through the PCH. The top sequential speeds look good on paper, but rarely come into play outside of benchmarks. I'm thinking M.2 PCIe x 8 slots will be common on X99 boards, and there's enough lanes that using M.2 shouldn't require disabling SATA ports or losing graphics lanes (unless SLI?).
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2014
  9. Scrizz

    Scrizz

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,919 (1.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    395
    Location:
    Florida, US
    who opened the PDF? ;)
    :p
     
  10. bpgt64

    bpgt64

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,445 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    193
    Location:
    ATL, GA
    I just side graded out of the X79 4930k setup to a 4790k, overclocks like a monster, waiting for m.2 sata prices to come down a bit and I'll reformat. I just don't do as much crunching at home as I thought to justify a HEDT based platform....
     
  11. GhostRyder

    GhostRyder

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,026 (6.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    367
    Location:
    Texas
    Interesting, cool that Asrock got the certification first. Might have to look at them when I buy x99 this fall!

    Though I'll probably still end up with asus unless this asrock completely blows me away.
     
  12. Hilux SSRG

    Hilux SSRG

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    966 (1.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    157
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    Be wary when upgrading, the lowest cpu 5820k will have only one x16 while the 5930k & 5960x with have two x16.

    And MSI released an image of their blacked out X99 that looks great over at techreport.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2014
  13. Petey Plane New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    23 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Why on earth would you spend money on a X99 platform when you just purchased a Devils Canyon platform? In basically every game, the DC platform will almost certainly be faster than the X99. And it's been shown over and over that the real-world difference between full 16x PCIE and 8x PCIE is virtually non-existent. Same goes for RAM speeds over 2133. Unless you are running 4x SLI or CF, (and if you can afford that, a 2nd mortgage shouldn't even be necesssary), I fail to see the need for that upgrade outside of professional applications. But to each his own I guess :confused:
     
  14. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,966 (6.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,047
    I believe he was referring to the fact that when the desktop 1366 platform came out it was early 2009, and by September 2009 Intel was already demoing SandyBridge.

    It WAS the split between enthusiast and consumer levels. 1366 was "Enthusiast Desktop", and 1156 was "Performance Desktop". 775 was the last socket before the Intel made the split.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  15. Hood

    Hood

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    817 (1.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    246
    Yeah, I'm happy with mine, 4.6 GHz@1.26 max vcore, and CPU scores rivaling stock 3960s. I'm just a little disappointed in the M.2 possibilities on Z97 - most slots are PCIe x2 (except for two Asrock boards which have a PCIe x4 slot). My M.2 Plextor M6e is actually a bit slower than my 840 Pro at common 4k operations, I think because the PCH has to convert the signal to SATA or some such, anyway, it takes a definite hit compared to other methods. Isn't faster storage ports the only reason to upgrade to Z97? So why did I just spend $900 on this? I'm a hardware junky...
    I probably won't upgrade to X99, even if Intel does it right. I'm just lamenting the lack of more PCIe lanes on Z97, not for SLI or Xfire, but to use for fast storage solutions. The technology is here, but a storage upgrade you can FEEL requires 4 or 8 lanes, and they just can't be spared out of only 16 lanes. As PCIe storage gains traction, new platforms will have to up their lane count to compensate (and it should have been done on Z97).
     
  16. Deadlyraver

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    279 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    Any word on prices?
     
  17. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,966 (6.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,047
    It would have been impossible to add PCI-E lanes to Z97 and maintain compatibility with the Z87 motherboards. Since the main PCI-E lanes come from the CPU, upping the number on the CPU to more than 16 would make the CPUs no longer work in older Z87 boards.

    Of course they could could have added some more secondary PCI-E lanes to the PCH, but they already have 8 available, so there really isn't any need for more there. Plus, the added latency of going through the PCH basically negates the performance benefits of PCI-E attached storage.

    In reality, the motherboard manufacturers should be stepping up here and adding some PCI-E switches to their boards that include M.2 slots. So they can have 32 PCI-E 3.0 lanes that can be shared between the graphics cards and M.2 storage solutions. This solution would add almost no latency, compared to routing through the PCH, and give the extra lanes we want.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  18. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,222 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    203
    .....no way around it.....currently building a mini itx z97 rig for every day usage.... and will be building a micro atx x99 (as long as that 6 or 8 core comes in at the right price) for work/epeen needs:D....life is an unknown variable....gotta enjoy it.
     
  19. ypsylon

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    To be honest X58 is not dead. Not by a long shot. It still does deliver plenty of power. I know, all my PCs running on 1366.

    At first I was optimistic about H-E, but then with every new press release and leaks I frankly couldn't care less now. It's technically Nehalem in more modern package (just like SB was). There is no real progress like there was between 478 and 775. It was a huge jump, but when I switched from 775 to 1366 it felt like switching Ford model T for USS Enterprise.

    Sorry Intel you have to do better not just repackage old tech as a new one. There must be real PROGRESS, not just some negligible difference in every day usage. Synthetic benchmarks are for nerds who running them 365/24/7.

    Some may say that there is plenty of new tech on motherboards: PCI-Ex 3, USB 3, micro SSD, blah blah. Only place where PCI-Ex 3.0 is relevant is industrial scale storage. There is no VGA (combination) in the world that can saturate 16x Gen 2.0/slot. My old 5 series -solid as rock- Adaptec RAID provides me with all RAID functionality I need and some more. SSDs are more of curiosity for me nothing more. Think these are fast? Dump on them few DIRs with 500k files each, any SSD will choke, cough and stutter as old HDD - but without the noise.

    I remember some years ago discussion with one older IT guy. He said that one day I'll stop being excited about IT and just measure it all in cool and calculated way. I guess reached that stage ~3 years ago. ;)
     
    techy1 says thanks.
  20. techy1

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2014
    Messages:
    80 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    I love that some guys are ready to spend extra $$$ upgraiding their X97 or Ivy-E/sandy-E just to gain few % performance... more points for you (and more $$$ to intel), one could go from X97 to X99 and back to Broadwell just in 6month period :D (and it sounds like some are ready for this move) ... tough I do not think that Intel deserve a extra 0,01$ for their last few generations "improvements".
     
  21. eroldru

    eroldru

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    5 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    ASRock does that. But I don't think high end users need a certificate. That piece of paper looks valid for OEM
     
  22. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,351 (6.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,116
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Is socket 1366 and X58 insufficient, no, it can still keep up with most tasks.
    Is the platform dead? Yes, there will never be a new skt1366 CPU, motherboards for the socket aren't produced anymore, and they continue to get more and more hard to come by. There is a word for that, "dead". I think you misunderstood what "dead" means, it doesn't mean obsolete.
     
  23. Deadlyraver

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    279 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    Here, here! :toast:

    I gotta say, after nearly 9 years it blows my mind over how much money's worth I'm getting out of this rig right now! :rockout:
     
  24. TheinsanegamerN

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2012
    Messages:
    225 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    New CPUs are not being produced, there are no more models coming to the platform, and almost nobody makes 1366 boards anymore. thats the definition of a dead platform. not saying it isnt usable, but it is technically dead. unusable would be obsolete, like 478 (kinda miss those days of rapid improvements. although 775 was better for that).

    its kinda sad how small of a difference there is between a 980x and a 4930k at the same clockspeed though.
     
  25. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,648 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    943
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Actually, apart from Core i7 920 up to 980X, there weren't any other for this socket. It was probably the most short lived socket ever. I also had incredibly hard time finding triple channel kit for the upgrade few weeks ago (not as much availability as it was the crazy price on most). Luckily i found one on Amazon (not sure which one). Good thing about X99 is that it comes with quad channel memory, so it's easier to fit and sell of RAM sticks in pairs (or buy them).
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page