1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Asus Ares II HD 7990 6 GB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Jan 21, 2013.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,037 (3.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,944
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 28, 2013
  2. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,931 (3.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,528
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    "Low noise during gaming"

    Music to my ears. :D All high end graphics cards should aspire to this.
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2013
    Widjaja, WarEagleAU and Damn_Smooth say thanks.
  3. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,247 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    851
    Should they all also use AIO Watercooling solutions?
     
  4. iO

    iO

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    73 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    Location:
    Germany
    What a sick beast...
     
  5. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,566 (3.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,677
    Amazing GPU:toast:
    Thanks W1z for the review!!!
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,915 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,434
    1. It's about three times more than my car! :eek:

    2. Performance is kinda all over the place. Sometimes it's just weird (WoW :laugh:), and sometimes it actually does twice as many FPSs as the 7970.

    BTW, any chance of a Crossfire review? :D
     
  7. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    This is such an engineering marvel, I mean that kind of performance on such a small package makes it a win.

    Too bad the price is so steep that you could buy a quad 7970 for the price.

    Awesome review W1zzard, ty :)

    Also INB4 omgwtf over 500w power consumption, unacceptable, etc etc.
     
  8. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,915 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,434
    For this it's not that bad. Now we might actually use those 1400W Platinum units in a single rig. :laugh:
     
  9. Norton

    Norton WCG-TPU Team Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Messages:
    9,112 (8.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21,432
    I want to see that card break the single card record for WCG gpu crunching :D
     
    NHKS says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  10. badtaylorx

    badtaylorx

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    487 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    153
    hey, i thought they changed the nda date.....you sure this is ok???
     
  11. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,037 (3.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,944
    in the end they didnt change it
     
    badtaylorx says thanks.
  12. Darkleoco

    Darkleoco

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,598 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    247
    Location:
    Cullowhee, North Carolina
    My only question is why would anyone besides collectors and the exceptionally rich purchase this card? There are many other possibilities if anyone actually NEEDS that much power you could get amazing quad-fire/quad-sli performance that I am sure exceeds what this card is capable of and could likely do it for less money as well.....
     
  13. badtaylorx

    badtaylorx

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    487 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    153
    sweet
     
  14. n0tiert

    n0tiert

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    925 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    404
    Location:
    Frankfurt/Main - Germany
    this is betta than sex , mhhhhhmmmmmmooooaaaarr
    grrrr i need to get this card......

    @W1zzard any clue on known plans about different coolers by EK & co?
     
  15. ArchStupid

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2008
    Messages:
    24 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    How the hell did this get an 8.9..?

    It's weaker than the 690GTX yet costs 60%(!!!) more.
    By far the lowest performance per dollar of any card.
    Almost double the power consumption of the GTX 690.
    It takes three slots + space for the block.

    I mean come on, how can anyone take that score seriously?
     
    valentyn0 says thanks.
  16. Darkleoco

    Darkleoco

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,598 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    247
    Location:
    Cullowhee, North Carolina
    It beats the 690 in nearly every game that has decent crossfire scaling, it is also a limited edition and watercooled card, what kind of troll are you exactly?
     
    mediasorcerer and PatoRodrigues say thanks.
  17. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,472 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,690
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    Curiosity...

    Anyone else use crossfire 7970's? I had crossfire working in Far Cry 3 but it was micro stuttery occasionally.
     
  18. natr0n

    natr0n

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    2,055 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,089
    Monster card is monstrously monstrous.
     
  19. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,800 (2.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,523
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    I'm not impressed with the price/performance at all. But that's apparently not the point.

    Nice review and wise to break out the performance results.
     
  20. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,123 (4.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,326
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    What impresses me the most is the card getting cooled by a single 120mm rad. Those are very decent temperatures for 600W or so going through a single rad.


    I'd love to have one, could never afford it though. I wonder if the case is big enough to mod into a full PC case with the ARES II installed...:p
     
  21. NdMk2o1o

    NdMk2o1o

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,447 (2.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    922
    Location:
    Redditch, Worcestershire, England
    Defo gonna need one of these for that beast, heck most screwless cases even struggle with high end GPU's (my CM Storm Sniper and VaporX 7950 being a prime example)
     
  22. leopr New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2007
    Messages:
    36 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    This is weaker for you ?:

    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    It's a limited edition, they've always been expensive but you can get the same performance with two 7970 clocked to 1100/1500.
     
  23. NdMk2o1o

    NdMk2o1o

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,447 (2.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    922
    Location:
    Redditch, Worcestershire, England
    On average it is slower than the 690 in all resolutions bar 2560x1600 and only edges it by 3% then.
     
  24. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,123 (4.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,326
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Again, drivers affecting overall outcome.

    And then, it takes the top spot, in nearly every resolution, except 1200x800.


    Also, several titles show better performance with 5760x1080 than in 2560x1600, again...driver issues. That's not ASUS's fault.

    If you have the money to spend on such a card then you MUST be smart enough to know that dual-GPU cards are always prone to multi-GPU rendering issues. This has been the case, FOREVER. As such, any such issues are not important, or you'd not consider the card anyway.
     
  25. leopr New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2007
    Messages:
    36 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Besides AC3 and a few games where the CF profiles are clearly not working the ARES is faster.

    2560x1600:

    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    Only 3% ? the gap looks bigger to me.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page