1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS GeForce GTX 660 Ti Direct CU II TOP 2048 MB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Aug 12, 2012.

  1. Casecutter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,181 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    90
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    Yep, this is a 1920x card that’s it. And at $330 performance is like I figured it would be middling. And in some ways erratic, while on titles that are 40-60Fps, here on W1zzards B-M it’s not any clear winner even when OC’d. I’m sorry now what 8 months late and this is what they bring? I want to see what this is like when we see frame latencies, and 99th percentile frame production.

    AMD can set 7950 with Boost at this price, while original reference 7970 can be found routinely for $370 and that can be flashed to GHz versions. This could have been earth shattering back in March when the GTX680 hit but now today, too tardy... so sorry!

    If you had pick up a 7950 back end Feb– early March and put-out say $450, by now you have enjoyed using it for like 24 weeks at say $5 a week, nothing wrong there! :D
     
  2. Am*

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    253 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Well sorry to break it to you, but that's a terrible analogy. You're trying to suggest the 660 is a Hyundai and the 680 is the Lamborghini... Well for starters a Hyundai doesn't run a slightly crippled Lambo engine, nor any other major components that are in any way comparable (which is all what the 660 is, a slightly crippled 680), secondly the performance difference between them isn't 8%-16%. Thirdly, this card was built with TRIPLE screen gaming in mind, to even suggest that running a DX9 port on a single 2560x1600 monitor on a GPU made for DX11 is taking it "out of design parameters" is ridiculous.

    [​IMG]

    Personally speaking, whatever I'm upgrading to next is going to be a 1080p card anyway...because I prefer running an overkill card on my monitor and get 60+FPS instead of doing what most other people seem to do, which is buy an overkill monitor and keep buying new GPUs until you find one fast enough for the monitor. But I cannot in any way see how people are rejoicing over this series of Nvidia GPUs when they have pretty much killed the enthusiast market by not even bothering to release a new chip (like a GK106), nevermind the fact that their flagship was a mid-range GPU to begin with, which just adds insult to injury. I just hope this is not going to be the future trend with Nvidia and worse yet, AMD (to release mid-range as flagships), otherwise they can count me and pretty much everyone else, out of buying any future high end GPUs.
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2012
  3. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,758 (1.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,050
    670 when it comes down a little in price. That is if don't want to go back to the red side of the street. They sell some hot juicy burgers, nice overclockers for around $330 (or even less sooner than later).
     
  4. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,178 (7.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,707
    Nope. Not until they get better driver support.
     
  5. NdMk2o1o

    NdMk2o1o

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,447 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    922
    Location:
    Redditch, Worcestershire, England
    Spot on with the analogy, though comparing GPU's to cars is like comparing apples to chimpanzees anyway (see what I did there?) I hate analogies :p

    Have to disagree saying this card was built for triple monitor gaming, no single GPU is built for triple monitor gaming regardless of what marketing says, since triple monitor gaming came along with the HD 5*** series you have always needed a multi GPU setup to get any kind of acceptable gaming performance.
     
  6. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,887 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,395
    No it's not. Where did you find that out? As someone above me said, single cards are not enough for it (depending on what you play of course). Seems decent enough for me in price too, sandwiched between the 7870 and the 7950 in both price and performance.
     
  7. Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,125 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    254
    Those south koreans are getting close tho.. 5.2sec

    2013 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track Spec

    :D
     
  8. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,178 (7.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,707
  9. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,559 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    954
    I'd like to see the galaxy one reviewed. Couldn't go back to under 3 GB but I really need 4 GBs, which interestingly enough galaxy has the cheapest 4 GB 670 as well.
     
  10. Jeffredo

    Jeffredo

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    797 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    117
    Damn I wish I had waited six more weeks and saved a $100 (instead of buying a GTX 670). This would have been a better match for my hoary old Phenom II X4 980 BE.
     
  11. 1c3d0g

    1c3d0g

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    699 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Looks like I touched a nerve with Am*. :roll:

    Whatever, man. If you have an ax to grind with NVIDIA, go ahead, I'm sure they won't miss your business, as they'll be selling millions of these cards anyway. Meanwhile for those who are educated about GPU's, they will know what to expect from a $300 part and, if you have enough cash for a triple monitor solution, you damn well know you need a $500+ GPU to power your rig smoothly. End of story. :p
     
  12. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,840 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    670
    Location:
    Iowa, USA

    My Jeep does 5.7 :)

    3GB won't affect performance with this 192Bit bus it needs more lanes.

    660 Ti is perfect for 1200p and less

    I liked the analogy, anyway this is not meant for 3monitors you maybe able to do 3, but fps will be hit, probably around 25-45fps in games at 5760x1080.

    I would never use a 660 Ti for 1600p, honestly I wouldn't even use a 670 only 680 for 1600p.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,559 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    954
    That's not how it works. Bandwidth is what matters.
     
  14. Rei86 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    172 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Since I love cars so much I can't let this comment go from both of you.

    The GTX690 can be considered the Lambo Aventador, The GTX680 a Gallardo LP-570-4, the GTX670 a Audi R8 5.2 FSi...and the GTX660ti the Audi S6.

    If you're not a car guy the Aventador is Lambo flagship V12, the Gallardo runs a V10, the R8 5.2 runs a detuned Gallardo V10, and the S6 is even further detuned Gallardo V10..

    BTW don't know if this is considered unwanted advertising but this Asus 660 can be had for $299.99 USD atm on newegg.
     
  15. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    Not the TOP model.

    But yeah I'd take that one instead. $30 cheaper and with same excelent cooler, you can overclock it yourself. Maybe the TOP model can achieve higher clocks because of better binning and maybe somewhat better power delivery, but I doubt it and the clock increase wouldn't be enough to make up the 10% price difference.

    Such an amazing custom design for reference price is amazing. And there's an MSI PE with TwinFrozr too, again not the OC model tested by W1zz, but close enough.
     
  16. Rei86 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    172 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Ah you're right its only 915/980 but hell its still good value. Probably can OC it too the TOP models 1059core without any hiccups and save 30bucks.
     
  17. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,008 (3.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,877
    that's what i would recommend to all users, who are willing to do some manual oc.

    if you are lazy/unknowledgable and just want something that works out of the box without messing around, spend the extra money
     
  18. Rastafari New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Hello everyone,

    first of all - I apologize for bumping this old thread, but I would really appreciate some help.

    Friend brought me his bricked (bad bios flash) Asus GTX 660 ti DirectCU II, card is not recognized by any software (nvflash, nvflash for windows, not even windows device manager) so reflashing bios is not an option without some hard moding.
    I think soldering is my only option, so can somene please help me locate bios chip on this card?
    Thank you in advance.

    Here are the pictures from this review:

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_660_Ti_Direct_Cu_II/images/front_full.jpg

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_660_Ti_Direct_Cu_II/images/back_full.jpg
     
  19. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,008 (3.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,877
    Google works well to identify chips, if you find the EEPROM it'll be quite clear in the chip's description
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page