1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS HD 7870 Direct CU II 2048M

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Mar 28, 2012.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,630 (3.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,361
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2012
    WarEagleAU, cadaveca, Super XP and 3 others say thanks.
  2. temp02 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    Messages:
    493 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    166
    should be (if math doesn't fail me)
    still great review, as always.
  3. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Excellent overcloking, way to go ASUS!
    W1z, just a sugestion, why not put o/c results among the others? (all the benchmarks and de summaries)
    That would be awesome!

    PD: wake me up when this card costs $240 =)
  4. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,430 (2.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,270
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    Good suggestion, but I suspect because overclocking is like gas mileage - it may vary from one car(d) to another.
  5. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,939 (4.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,334
    It was finally smart of asus not to bump price up on such a miniscuile overclock.

    Id only pay higher if the cooler is far better as of keeping stock temps down while keeping noise tolerable. Also if the pcb is ref price shouldnt change drastically
  6. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,630 (3.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,361
    makes graphs more complicated to read: "more colored bars", and adds a ton of testing time, running all the benchmarks again with oc
  7. DarkOCean

    DarkOCean

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,613 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    348
    Location:
    on top of that big mountain on mars(Romania)
    Wtf is wrong with the power consumption on this card? it only has 10% oc and no overvolting.
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2012
  8. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    But W1z, that way we can compare o/c 7870 with the other cards on all the games!, please!!
  9. Inceptor

    Inceptor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    497 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    119
    The sample overclock resulted in +14.1% performance.
    Get a calculator, turn it on, multiply results of benchmarks by 1.141.
    Why should he waste his time rerunning benchmarks? He'd have to redo ALL benchmarks for ALL cards...
    :shadedshu
  10. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,939 (4.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,334
    thats what the similar reviews button is for, review the product yourself
  11. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Lazy man!

    14.1 x everygame? it AVG, not the same increase for every game ...¬¬
  12. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    amazing card must say
  13. Jstn7477

    Jstn7477

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,776 (2.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,482
    Location:
    Sarasota, Florida, USA
    Looks like a nice card, but I probably wouldn't get rid of my 6950 unlocked for it due to the seemingly small performance difference. Probably decent if you don't have a 6950 and can't afford the awesome GTX 680 that beats nearly everything but costs $150 more.
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  14. Inceptor

    Inceptor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    497 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    119
    It's a percentage. If the overclock gives that percentage in one benchmark, it will give it in all other benchmarks. If you want to look at it another way, think of it as a 'modifier', apply the the 1.141 modifier to the Asus Direct CUII at stock and you get the performance in any particular benchmark based on the percentage modifier. It has absolutely nothing to do with any manufacturer/designer specific features of the gpu, or any specific code in a game benchmark, it's an increase in overall hardware performance. It applies to all benchmarks...

    Why do I even bother?
  15. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    There are games that don't go up the same way others do, some get huge increases some don't, is that so hard to understand?
    Anyway, thanks for your OPINION, i don't have to agree with you :)
  16. Inceptor

    Inceptor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    497 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    119
    "games that don't go up the same way others do..."

    It doesn't apply well to cpu limited games, like Starcraft 2, but it applies to every other game out there. It doesn't matter what game it is, who coded it, what the gpu is; if you increase the performance of the gpu, it increases the performance in all games and benchmarks by the same percentage, except, as mentioned, in cpu limited games.

    I can tell that your English is not precise enough for you to articulate yourself properly, and that you probably have not understood everything. So I'll leave it there.

    Here's to hoping you don't make another intemperate comment based on misunderstanding. :cool:
  17. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    843 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Location:
    Look behind you!!
    Good, SLI scales better :laugh:
  18. Alvy Ibn Feroz New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Dhaka, Bangladesh
    I am sure something is wrong with the 7950/7970 because even with about 40% higher sp and 60% more transistors at 1920*1200 HD 7950 is only about 6% and HD 7970 is 18% faster than 7870. 7900 also has a 384 bit wide memory. :shadedshu
  19. dir_d

    dir_d

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    848 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Manteca, Ca
    I agree something is off or they are just clocked too low stock
  20. Alvy Ibn Feroz New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Dhaka, Bangladesh
    7870 and 7970 both @ 1ghz there will be only 15-20% difference but 7970 has 40% higher sp and 60% more transistor and also 384 bit wide memory. sometimes 7950 gets beaten by the 7870.
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2012
  21. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,817 (1.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    664
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Might as well save some $ and just get this over the 7950.
  22. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    WOW, 984bit :eek::twitch::roll: that's monstruous!!

    Maybe the 7970 & 7950 are bottlenecked?
  23. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,124 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    It's the same thing in all reviews. The only potential bottleneck is ROP's, but I find that unlikely. There has to be something at work in the 79xx cards that makes them so much less efficient than Pitcairn...
  24. Alvy Ibn Feroz New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Sorry its 384 bit not 984 bit. You should understand that its only a typing mistake.
  25. Alvy Ibn Feroz New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Dhaka, Bangladesh
    7970 isn't bottleneck-ed by Rops because there is no game out there which can use 70% rops of the 7970

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page