1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS Maximus V Formula/ThunderFX Intel LGA 1155

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by cadaveca, Jul 20, 2012.

  1. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,397 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,473
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 24, 2012
    dumo, Daimus, radusorin and 4 others say thanks.
  2. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,080 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    802
    360$ is just unfortunate for a board like this... :\
  3. SIGSEGV

    SIGSEGV

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    498 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    106
    hmm, my board is not good enough through this review.
    thanks for the review ;)
  4. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Banstick Dummy

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,635 (8.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,244
    Wow! Board seems undone. I hope some bios updates fix these issues.
  5. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    8,979 (6.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,750
    Id rather just get the normal formula and save the $100
  6. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,397 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,473
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Not me.


    What's funny is that I swear I saw this board on sale @ $339. I think it should be $329.
  7. dumo

    dumo

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    634 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    473
    Location:
    NYC
    This board clocked BBSE the best
    cadaveca says thanks.
  8. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,397 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,473
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    What BIOS version did you use, Dumo?


    That's great info, BTW. I've been using the Gene to clock mems, maybe I'll get an Extreme to do that with instead.
  9. Steven B

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    593 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    52
    hey did your memory OC recovery work?

    My favorite part about the M5E is the memory profiles.
  10. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,397 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,473
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Cannot say I needed to use it? stuff jsut worked liek I wanted, mostly, didn't have muc hfailed boots, really, actually, honestly, not a single one.
    Steven B says thanks.
  11. dumo

    dumo

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    634 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    473
    Location:
    NYC
    M5F bios 0094

    Testing mem

    BBSE

    [​IMG]

    Hynix

    [​IMG]
    cadaveca says thanks.
  12. rewarder New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    @cadaveca
    Finally a reviewer that came to the same conclusion like I did in my review. Something related to performance really isn't ok with this board. It simply lacks behind and with a board this expensive there absolutely shouldn't be issues like this. I was even harder on the rating at the end I gave it 3.5 out of 5 stars, simply because there are quite a few boards out there that are better and more consistent but not excellent.
  13. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,582 (4.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,269
    thats always the case with Asus, but I think they had to rush since it would appear that AsRock was on the ball with launch of their OC series
  14. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,397 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,473
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta

    Ah, Shammy Betas.


    :rockout:


    I'm, just honest, and the numbers don't lie. IN the end, the numbers are lower than others, but really not that bad, and might help clock furuther, too, so there is also that to consider. THe board IS perfectly stable, so that's my main focus, of course. stability problems woudl have led to a much lower score from me, but I saw none.
  15. dumo

    dumo

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    634 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    473
    Location:
    NYC
    @Cadaveca... Did you test stability/oc with 4X all mem. slots?
  16. rewarder New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    The weird thing is that with the Maximus V Extreme you get that performance level one expects from a hight-end board. I really don't see why ASUS wasn't able to deliver it with the MVF.

    In the past few years I haven't come across a board that wasn't stable. So in my ponit of view stability is almost out of the equation, since every board is stable. Of course if it shouldn't be, than that is a killer criterion and that would lead to as seriously bad rating.
  17. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,397 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,473
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Well, you know, I do tend to spend a fair bit of time with products tat aren't launched yet, and stability there can be questionable, specifically if I happen to be using the wrong memory. The memory options that ASUS offers go a long way toward ensuring such things aren't really an issue.



    @ Dumo, yeah, I tried hynix 2133 up to 2400 and the Corsair sticks, of course, not much to say there...
  18. fullinfusion

    fullinfusion 1.21 Gigawatts

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    7,755 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,696
    Great review again Dave....:respect:
    A little disappointing with Asus this time around. Mabey I expected to much so moves on..

    Thanks for saving me the cash for something else :)
  19. GreenMazinger

    GreenMazinger New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Great review, as usual :)

    Since you stuck this into a CM 690 do you think it will fit into a Corsair 500R or a C70 without messing with the SATA cables?
  20. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,397 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,473
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I do not see much issue, especially since those cases feature better cable management. My CM690 is the original version that's like 5 years old. :p
    GreenMazinger says thanks.
  21. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,142 (13.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,592
    No problem in a 500R. :)
    GreenMazinger and cadaveca say thanks.
  22. ...PACMAN...

    ...PACMAN...

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2012
    Messages:
    274 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    @Dave - Do you know if performance has improved with bios updates? I am looking to get this board as the extreme would probably be overkill for myself. I'm looking to go for a 3770k, SLI 680 setup (or maybe even a Titan:D ) and will simply be using an x60 Kraken for CPU cooling. Also, any suggestions regarding a fast 16gb RAM kit would be very much appreciated with regards this board. Thanks :)

    @erocker - Having owned the board for a while and running the same cpu as I'm looking to get, how have you found it and would you recommend it for the setup I mentioned. Also I see you are running windows 8, any DPC latency issues with this setup as I have heard that mentioned alot recently with regards windows 8 and certain configs? Thanks:)
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2013
  23. drdeathx

    drdeathx New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    Pacman, Not to crap on an Asus thread, I wouild entertain the Gigabyte Z77-UD7. I reviewed almost every Z77 board and if your gonna fork cash for the Asus, Look at the UD7. Great board. It is the one I kept for my personal daily rig. I did like the Maximus though too but just have a fancy for the giga...
    ...PACMAN... says thanks.
  24. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,397 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,473
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Performance rarely improves with BIOS updates. The kit I used in the review is a good choice, but I also have a memory set I reviewed that will go live soon that makes a good combo with this board, also in color.;)


    As to Windows8, I test all boards with Windows8 as part of my regular routine. There is an issue with the Windows8 BIOSes on this board, and overclocking. Really though, I have found this problem is found on all Z77-based boards, but not X79. I use Windows8 daily on my X79 rig with an ASUS board with no problems at all.

    Windows8 and overclocking on Z77 can cause BIOS corruption, to the point that multiplier and voltage changes can be made in BIOS, but never actually hold. If pushed a bit more, this will completely render the board useless for overclocking, since no changes in BIOS have any effect.

    Of course, flashing the BIOS to an older version, and then flashing back can sometimes fix this, but not always. ASUS is aware of the issue, has replicated it(Shamino posted on XS he's got it now), and is working on a fix, if possible. This same fix would then roll into the other ASUS Z77 boards, and maybe to other brands as well.


    I do not believe that ASUS is at fault for this issue, and it's more Windows8 and Intel's most recent MEI, but I am not sure 100% what the real problem is...I just know I can make it happen on any Z77 board, with nearly any config. It might be related to how Windows8 has hybrid hibernate mode that allows for fast resume.


    So, to avoid this problem, when overclock testing, use BIOSes prior to 0906, find your stable clock, and then you can update to newer BIOSes if needed.


    I have to say, too, that it is not the board crashing that causes the issue.. for me, I use a VGA crash to get the BIOS corruption. And I also got the same BIOS corruption on the Gigabyte Z77X-UP7 that DrDeathX here mentioned. I reviewed this ASUS board back in July, and there were no issues..the problems began with a BIOS update that came out in late August, and has persisted since.
    ...PACMAN... says thanks.
  25. ...PACMAN...

    ...PACMAN...

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2012
    Messages:
    274 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Thats great information Dave and I really appreciate your detailed response. No BS, just the facts. Might I add what a bizarre issue that is and kudos for heads up oh wise one :)

    Thanks again and at this point I'm thinking it may be worth going that extra mile and getting the extreme, I'm kind of a sucker for that RoG design but also Asus in general. I looked at the board that drdeathx suggested and it looks like a great performer but I want this build to keep me happy for a fair while so I'm also aiming for pleasing aesthetics.
    cadaveca says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page