1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS P5N-T Deluxe nForce 780i Motherboard Preview

Discussion in 'News' started by malware, Nov 23, 2007.

  1. malware New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,476 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    ASUS P5N-T Deluxe will be the firm's nForce 680i series successor. Brought to fix some of the nForce 680i bugs, the ASUS P5N-T Deluxe uses NVIDIA's soon to be released nForce 780i chipset, which is in fact a 680i with an added additional PCIe 2.0 bridge. The six pages long preview shows pretty much everything from specs to board layout and heatsink design.

    ASUS P5N-T Deluxe nForce 780i Motherboard Preview

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: HardwareXL
     
  2. Nyte New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    185 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Location:
    Toronto ON
    I should warn everybody now that the PCIe 2.0 bridge is actually a PCIe 2.0 to PCIe 1.1 bridge.

    What does this mean?

    Well, it means your PCIe 2.0 card will basically be bottlenecked at PCIe 1.1 speeds when communicating to the CPU. False marketing from NVIDIA.

    Here's a simple diagram of their "bridge":

    . PCIe 1.1 upstream port to HOST
    ..........______|_____
    .........|..................|
    .........|...."Bridge"....|
    .........|..................|
    .........|___________|
    .............| | | |
    . PCIe 2.0 downstream ports to PCIe slots.


    The only improvement that you may see with this is that communicating between other GPU's through the PCIe slot will be at 2.0 speeds (which is highly unlikely because NVIDIA uses their SLI bridge connector, not the slot).

    AMD has TRUE PCIe 2.0 so EVERYTHING will be happening at 2.0 speeds.
     
    [I.R.A]_FBi, Weer, Shyska and 3 others say thanks.
  3. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,708 (13.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,106
    I have read and confirmed this myself.
     
    patton45 says thanks.
  4. FatForester New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    971 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    151
    Right angle SATA ports FTL. And thanks for the info about the "PCIe 2.0," Nyte!
     
  5. Judas

    Judas

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,032 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Well got to say nice looking board :)
     
  6. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,797 (3.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    546
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    So the only major difference is PCIe 2.0 support? The hell...
     
  7. insider Guest

    You don't need PCI-E 2.0 right now, the PCI-E 1.1 is not even maxed out yet, but I agree if this is false advertising by nVidia meaning your future PCI-E 2.0 upgrades will be bottle necked!!!!

    I'm not gonna buy an nVidia board ever again, it's always gonna be Intel or AMD based from now on.
     
  8. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,966 (6.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,047
    I want to see overclocking results, specifically with quad-core processors. I really hope some of the "bugs" they have fixed includes the down right poor quad-core overclocking.

    What does it matter, show me a card that actually uses PCI-E 2.0, then you will have a point about bottlenecking. By the time we see PCI-E cards that actually use PCI-E 2.0 we will be on PCI-E 3.0(or whatever it will be called). PCI-E 2.0 is nothing more than gimmicky hype, just like SATA II.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  9. KennyT772

    KennyT772 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,585 (1.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    103
    The main reason behind PCI-E 2.0 is for 8x multiple gpu systems and 1x/4x expansion cards. PCI-E 1.1 16x has more than plenty of bandwidth for any gpu, however 1.1 8x does not in some cases. With PCI-E 2.0 a x8 slot becomes the same as 1.1 16x in terms of throughput. With say the intel chipsets and their 16x 4x Crossfire setup, not having that bandwidth on the second card really killed performance in cases where you have no bridge. That is the only place 2.0 helps us.

    On the server side of things 2.0 is way more important. Fewer lanes are needed for high bandwidth cards, which means more 4x/8x slots on server mobo's. This gives much more room for expandability, scalability, and longevity.

    In terms of this bridge, it is mainly for marketing, and compatibility.
     
    Chewy says thanks.
  10. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,615 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    168
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    and this board will cost a bazillion dollars, yay......
     
  11. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,674 (5.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,506
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    Nice, well explained but when you say everything will be happening at PCI-E 2.0 speeds you mean that 5GBit Bandwidth will be available and 150W be on tap, but as no card can use even the 2.5GBit bandwith of PCI-E 1.1 then there is little real time effect, damn the firsts graphics card to actually exceed the bandwidth offered by AGP 8x was the 8800GTX so we have a way to go yet before we can exceed 2.5GBit.
    I just mention this just in case any of our less experienced members or visitors think that with a PCI-E 2.0 Gfx card they can plug it into a PCI-E 2.0 enabled slot on a motherboard and magically there is extra bandwidth/speed actually there, well it is there in so much as it's available, it is just not being used. Damn I'm confused now :eek:
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page