1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS Releases its Dual-GPU GeForce GTX 590 with VoltageTweak

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 24, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    29,292 (10.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,933
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Presenting more graphics processing output than any single-board product developed to date, the ASUS GTX 590 uses dual NVIDIA GF110 cores. With ASUS exclusive Voltage Tweak to drive the card at 918MHz, it enables DirectX 11 gaming in the highest resolutions possible and with all details and effects turned on to maximum, as well as smooth and realistic 3D gaming and movies through NVIDIA 3D Vision Surround for three-screen displays.

    [​IMG]

    Product highlights
    • Dual GF110 GPUs boost performance over the former top-of-the-line GTX 580 reference design, enhancing graphics processing capabilities for the strongest NVIDIA Fermi-based product delivered to date on a single circuit board. The large 3GB video memory allotment uses fast GDDR5 technology and a dual 384-bit memory interface for improved bandwidth and interconnectivity with other system components.
    • The ASUS GTX 590 uses a core that runs at 612MHz, making it the fastest NVIDIA dual-core graphics card ever launched. ASUS exclusive overvolting utility Voltage Tweak takes advantage of this new power, allowing users with aggressive cooling to push the card further for up to 50% faster clock speeds at 918MHz. This represents very noticeable enhancements to in-game smoothness and responsiveness.
    • Full support for NVIDIA 3D Vision Surround, driven by the capabilities of this dual-GPU card, easily handles full HD 3D output simultaneously on three displays.
    • Two GPUs balanced and optimized on a single board mean the GTX 590 offers more than double the power of the GTX 580, running in always-on 2-way SLI by default.
     
    Jack Doph says thanks.
  2. Jstn7477

    Jstn7477

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,952 (1.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,620
    Location:
    Sarasota, Florida, USA
    Hope it doesn't blow up after a few seconds at 918MHz.
     
    Mussels says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  3. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,219 (3.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12,220
    918 mhz is not possible, this is just some marketing bs
     
    HammerON, Mussels and mtosev say thanks.
  4. mtosev

    mtosev New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,463 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    Location:
    Maribor, Slovenia
    gotta love BS marketing.it's so original lol
     
  5. Relinquish New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    126 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
  6. alexsubri

    alexsubri

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,391 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    199
    Nvidia the way its meant to burn
     
  7. Kelarik New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    8 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    I do love how people don't actually read the article then call bs on it. Sure 918 is possible, just requires lots of LN2, patience, and a good batch of chips.
     
  8. Shihabyooo

    Shihabyooo

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    569 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    A sad excuse of a country called Sudan.
    And a fire extinguisher in hand.
     
  9. Batou1986

    Batou1986

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,555 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    409
    Location:
    Baltimore MD
    i don't understand how cooling comes into play here the chips/resistor that failed are not cooled by anything
     
  10. Aceman.au

    Aceman.au

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,470 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    73
    Zomg, I loled so hard @ that comment
     
  11. ShogoXT

    ShogoXT New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    974 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    84
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Its a trap!
     
  12. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    754 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Hyderabad
    OMG voltage tweak and blow-up, ASUS's new campaign..
     
  13. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    it'll BLOW you away.

    red-hot performance.

    one of a kind experience!

    technology you'll be talking (and laughing!) about for years to come!
     
  14. KaelMaelstrom

    KaelMaelstrom New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    64 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Location:
    Malaysia
    experiencing the explosion of this card is way better than experiencing the power of Physx
     
    Mussels says thanks.
  15. Jack Doph

    Jack Doph

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    508 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Location:
    Upright down-under (Brisbane, Australia)
    To be honest, I must add some balance here, as reported by my mate in the UK regarding this card (it was his response to my link of W1zzard's review here):
    "Hm, from first hand experience I'd have to disagree with the conclusion. I see a few reviews have had "peoblems" where the card has died, until we see some more real world testing from actual users I don't think that's something we can really pick at.
    The way I see it, it's cheaper than 580 SLI, and offers a little less performance, while drawing less power and being quieter. Even with the fan turned up, it's not obnoxiously loud (too loud for me, but I'm a little obsessive with noise). Temperatures are great even without the fan turned up, and let's be honest - a large part of the target market for this card will be watercooling it anyway.
    Overclock the card a little - we managed somewhere around 830 on the core from 607 stock, with a very minor voltage increase - and performance is niothing short of outstanding, with temperatures and noise still well within reason. With further tuning and better cooling, I don't think that 900 is an unreasonable expectation, possibly 950 or even higher with exotic cooling. Even with beta, unrefined drivers, it handily bested highly overclocked 480 SLI, 570 SLI, and 580 SLI.
    Nvidia's SLI scaling is so much better with the Fermi cards than it used to be with, say, G92 or GT200, and I have to say I see so many less problems with their drivers than with ATi's.
    I'm tempted by this card myself, but I really can't justify that amount of money - to need this card, you'd better be running a 2560x1440 or better monitor, or doing heavy 3D gaming, or using Nvidia Surround. For anything else apart from GPU-based computing, it's massive overkill.
    "

    I left his typos in place :p

    It does mean, however, that good samples *can* be had ;)
     
  16. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    no, it just means that they either didnt OC at all, or they ran on drivers that throttled performance to prevent assplosions.
     
  17. Jack Doph

    Jack Doph

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    508 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Location:
    Upright down-under (Brisbane, Australia)
    :confused:
    How do you deduce this?
     
  18. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    because thats what triggers the card death. the only 'fix' is to run newer Nvidia drivers that trigger the throttle before they catch on fire.
     
  19. Jack Doph

    Jack Doph

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    508 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Location:
    Upright down-under (Brisbane, Australia)
    "Even with beta, unrefined drivers, it handily bested highly overclocked 480 SLI, 570 SLI, and 580 SLI."

    Perhaps you missed this line?
     
  20. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    uhhh... i think we're talking about two different things. the cards have to throttle so they DONT blow. those results you're seeing, are with the throttle working.
     
  21. Jack Doph

    Jack Doph

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    508 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Location:
    Upright down-under (Brisbane, Australia)
    But that would reduce the attained speed they achieved, which didn't occur.
    So.. I don't get what you're saying :confused:
     
  22. EchoMan New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    73 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Someone sue asus for false advertising and claims...I'm pretty sure on the box and in the manual it doesn't mention L2 and x,y,z for b outcome...
     
  23. Fatal

    Fatal

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    734 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    122
    Location:
    Golden, Colorado
    I say proof or it never happened I doubt it could best the 580 SLI.
     
  24. micropage7

    micropage7

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,370 (3.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,501
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    dual gpu on one card looks like processor, 1st single processor then dual processor on one board. like today where it packed, i guess it is about time before gpu goes multicore
     
  25. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,466 (1.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    599
    Location:
    AZ
    oh they must be confusing this with 580 sli, that's where the 918 came to play. lol
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page