1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS Ultra HD Monitor Lineup Led by a 39-incher

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jun 3, 2013.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,853 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    It looks like the 31.5-inch PQ321 won't be the only 4K Ultra-HD monitor from ASUS for long. The company unveiled the even bigger unnamed 39-incher at Computex for a brief moment, before veiling it back, leaving us just enough time to take a few snaps. The 39-inch monitor is based on a VA (vertical-alignment) panel, compared to the IGZO panel that drives the PQ321. That could possibly make it cheaper. It offers a native resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels, single-figure response time, 60 Hz refresh rate (when taking input from DisplayPort 1.2), 5,000:1 static contrast ratio with dynamic mega-contrast, 350 cd/m² brightness, 170°/170° viewing angles, and inputs that include a DisplayPort 1.2, and two HDMI. It also features a different forked stand design to the PQ321.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2013
  2. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,929 (5.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,362
    Do want!
     
  3. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    Removes the need for 3 monitors in one swoop...Can't wait for the Koreans to start pumping them out.
     
    NeoXF says thanks.
  4. BigMack70

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    506 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    114
    i really hope this is not terribly expensive... I would LOVE to get one :respect:
     
  5. jigar2speed

    jigar2speed

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2012
    Messages:
    192 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    30
    You should read the post above yours, that should bring a lot of hope :cool:
     
  6. ogharaei TPU Proofreader Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    95 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Very nice
     
  7. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    776 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    I dont think the 31.5" PQ321 or the unnamed 39" model will be cheap.

    However, "relatively" cheap for a 4K would probably be ~$2000 for the 31.5" PQ321,....but i'm just guessing.

    Im not really in the market for one myself but the last one I came across was a used 22" IBM 3840x2400 for ~$1600 off of Amazon directly from Amazon as the seller.
     
  8. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    39 inch is too big imo, the 31,5 inch model has caught my attention.

    I have my eyes set on a 4k monitor by the end of the year.

    Will probably be the the PQ321 or the Sharp PN-K321, although the latter's price is ridiculous atm.


    To be fair 2000$ would be pretty awesome considering one the first iterations of 30" 2560x1600 monitors costed around 2k EUR.
     
  9. nickbaldwin86

    nickbaldwin86

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Messages:
    264 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Ya I want the 31.5... but I will wait tell they come down in price and made by all... once it becomes a market hit... everyone will make them and they will become cheap... just like the rest of the monitors. @ $1500 I could pull the trigger,.. dont think this will be $1500 :eek:
     
  10. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    Has 2560x1600 resolution ever become cheap? That's what boggles me, could take a lot more than we'd imagine to have cheap UHD monitors.
     
  11. nickbaldwin86

    nickbaldwin86

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Messages:
    264 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    UMmmm if you remember when the 1st Dell 30 came out it was $2800 (2560x1600)
    They are $1000 if you find it on a deal from Dell.
    Or a Zr30w HP can be had for around that or less
    ....I am not willing to jump on new tech just because it is new... I give it a refresh and let it get cheaper.

    4k will become a TV standard... sure in a few years. and it will be cheaper. 2k never caught on.
     
  12. JDG1980

    Joined:
    May 8, 2013
    Messages:
    83 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    At a size of 39 inches, a 4K monitor would have a pixel density of just under 113 ppi. This means it might appeal to people who think better screens should be used to cram in more information, not get smoother text at the same virtual size. (For what it's worth, I'd rather get the smoother text - after using an iPad 4, the low ppi of a PC monitor is somewhat painful.) At 113 ppi, you could probably get away with leaving Windows on the standard 100% scaling factor if you have good eyesight.

    To get 96 ppi (the Windows standard), you'd need a 46-inch 4K monitor - or, more likely, a 4K TV repurposed as a monitor. That would be the equivalent of having four bezel-less 1080p screens in one unit.
     
    Prima.Vera says thanks.
  13. BigMack70

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    506 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    114
    2560x1600 has never been marketed at anything other than graphics professionals. There has never been a push to generate content in that format or produce TVs in that format or basically do anything with that format other than market it to graphics professionals, so it has remained an expensive niche product.

    If they begin to develop content for 4k and market it in the TV world, it has potential to do what 1080p did and become mainstream. There are no technical reasons why 1440/1600p panels must have the crazy cost of entry that they do, and the same goes for 4k. It all depends who the consumer they target is going to be.


    I really like the ~110 PPI mark. It's about what I've got on my 27" 1440p screen and while I can still make out the pixels, they are small enough that I never notice unless I'm looking for it. That's why I really like the idea of a 40" 4k screen for gaming :)
     
  14. xvi

    xvi

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,118 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,405
    Location:
    Washington, US
    Looking for one female member with which to produce offspring with the intent to sell said offspring for the purchase of two of these monitors, one for each of us.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. xBruce88x

    xBruce88x

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,432 (1.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    615
    And here i just finally got a 1080p monitor...

    maybe as more are released 2560x will be more mainstream and cheaper?

    looks like a pretty sweet monitor... do want... but can't afford atm
     
  16. acerace

    acerace

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    252 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Location:
    Malaysia
    Haha, seems like our case is similar. 2012 is the first time I'm using 16:9 monitor, before then I'm using 5:4 one. How terrible. :roll:
     
  17. nickbaldwin86

    nickbaldwin86

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Messages:
    264 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
  18. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,266 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    Good. Let me just say THUMBS UP for innovation and increasing options on displays.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page