1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ATI Believes GeForce GTX 200 Will be NVIDIA's Last Monolithic GPU.

Discussion in 'News' started by Polaris573, Jun 17, 2008.

  1. DarkMatter New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Could you post a link to where Nvidia's CEO said that please? And where those power numbers were mentioned, though I suppose it's the same. I highly doubt going to 55nm won't make the card consume less than 200W.
    Also as I mentioned, Nvidia doesn't need 2 280s to crush Ati's X2, not even 2 260s. By only shrinking the chip to 55nm it would be 400mm2, take some ROPs out and you will get a die size close to G92. No one has said GT200 GX2 is possible but GT200b IS, and you will see it soon if Ati's X2 happens to be quite faster than GTX280.

    Also real power consumption of GTX280 is nowhere near those 236W, while the older cards are close to their claimed TDP. It's temperatures are far better than on G92 and RV670 too, despite being a lot bigger, so there's some room left there. If GT200b can't improve the performance beyond that of the X2 a GX2 of GT200b WILL come, but it's nature is not so defined. In fact a card with 2x the performance of GTX280 doesn't make sense AT ALL. If it did, because games in the near future could take advantage of it, then Ati would be LOST.

    In the end it will all depend on the real performance of the RV770. AFAIK HD4870 > 9800 GTX by 25% and HD4850 > 8800 GT by 25%. That also means HD4850 > 9800 GTX but by 5-10 %. ANYWAY forget about that if the performance boost of newer drivers happens to be true.
     
  2. DarkMatter New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Wow I knew that such big die size and low die number meant fewer complete dies in theory, but seing that in a picture is more impressive! I counted 95 complete dies there, and like 30 incomplete ones. Almost 10 of the incomplete ones have more than 90% of the die intact, but I don't know if they can use them. I guess they can cut that part, that judging by the die picture that means cutting some SPs in most of them and sell it as GTX260. Nevertheless only that fact alone contributes to lower yields, I suppose, and the number of incomplete dies is going to be a lot lower at 55 nm.
     
  3. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,418 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    Location:
    AZ
    lol nvidia didn't bet the farm on this one. if they did we'd be seeing a commercial on televsion every 3 seconds followed by famous endorcements, several small islands being purchased and named gtx280. lol

    nvidia is a big company and it would take alot for them to "bet the farm" on a single chip. it's not like nvidia will really care if ati's is faster thsi time. nvidia will just simply laugh when theirs outsells ati's faster card. this has been typical since the dawn of nvidia (though back then it was rare that ati got a win, the radeon was the first to even truly compete)

    the gtx280 seems to be a flop, no biggie nvidia will launch a revision which may or may not flop as well. it doesn't matter because nvidia is already working 4-5 generations out. So if this generation is a flop, they'll simply pour more of their employees into the next gen.

    Ati also works several generations out which is why it didn't matter that the r600 was a flop. they already had several others in the pipeline that they knew performed better perwatt.

    and I seriously have to laugh at all the fanboys who say "look at the last 2 years, nvidia can't lose" wow was the 8800 your first gpu or what? nvidia nor intel nor amd nor ati nor via nor any other manufacturer can put out the best product every time. it's impossible and history tells us differently. the ti4000 series stomped all over ati's radeon 8500. and all the nvidia fanboys went "see nvidia can't lose" and then came the fx series in which the 9700's stomped all over and later the 9800's widened the gap. Then fact that nvidia has been ruling for the past 2 years only strengthens the argument that the ati card will be faster this time. ATi and nvidia have been doing this dance since long before many on this forum, knew what a graphics card was and they'll be doing this dance long after. it's development + pressure from competition + a little luck that forms the winner. and nvidia has been missing an element making them less likely to come on top this time.

    the gtx280 was the chip specs wise we all wanted it to be double the rop's double the mem bit, and nearly double the shaders. the trouble is each time the gpu manufacturers double things, it takes games quite a while to catch up in coding to use the extra power. The gtx280 will only grow more powerful as time goes on, but it will likely be the last of it's kind. why? because it's the way the markets going. the bigger badder phase started when intel was pushing the clock speeds and ati was pushing the pixel pipeline. both required more cooling and psu than previous generations had seen. the core2duo is different offering more power without going for the GHZ (stock comparison of course) and each generation seems to have a lower tdp than the last. gpu's similarly will start (and have already started rv670/g92) doing the same thing. the high tdp gpus will start going by the wayside while cheaper/quieter/lower tdp versions will replace them. the g92 did a good job of increasing performance while dropping heat and energy requirements. the gt200b will likely do the same with nvidias next chip being cooler than the gt200b. it's market trends. more ussers are going for cooler quiter pc's than in 2000 making this quite a different battle than it used to be.
     
    Zubasa and X-TeNDeR say thanks.
  4. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,512 (2.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,143
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    I agree that each company will take the lead somehow, and keep alternating. I believe that eventually, there will be a standstill when they hit physical limits of graphics processing technology, and advancements will slow, and basically most cards will be equal for a period of time.
     
  5. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,418 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    Location:
    AZ
    is it just me or would a square wafer make alot more sense lol. I mean look at all the partials that needn't be that way if the dies weren't square and the wafer round.
     
  6. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    why is it round?
     
  7. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,691 (11.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,664
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Because 'stuff' is 'planted' on it while it spins.
     
  8. DarkMatter New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Yeah I thought the same some years back when I first saw a wafer picture. I suppose wafers being round has to do with their manufacturing process, but why can't be square is a question I have since that first time. It was a comparison of a chip at 180nm and 130nm, and I have to say there were a lot more dies than ~100, so incomplete ones were a lot less in comparison. Complete dies on 130 nm were more than double the ones on 180nm. Theoretically each CPU process (180-130-90-65-45-32...) can do double the number of dies than the previous one, but I think it's actually a bit more because of that.

    It spins? Really? Or are you just kidding? I thought they were made by exposition to "light" and chemicals. Pretty much how you would reveal photos in the old fashion. I read an article about how they made the chips and I don't remember anything about spining, not at least while the layout was being "printed"... :confused:
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2008
  9. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    So because of the smaller 55nm die,you'd get a lot more complete cores on a 300mm wafer.So in theory you'd get a higher yield with a 55nm die/300mm wafer.
     
  10. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,691 (11.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,664
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Why do people enjoy complicated lives? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_fabrication

    It's round so it aides several manufacturing processes. A Perti-plate is never square, we use them for microbial cultures. It's round and so aides streaking, colony design, etc. I wish pizza was square, but then it becomes difficult for Dominoes to make them. They come in a semi-manufactured state, the local Dominoes completes the manufacture before giving it away to the delivery boys.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 19, 2008
  11. DarkMatter New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    And that only from geometry perspective. :)

    You have to add lower operational voltages, lower in-between transistor latency = higher possible clocks and lower power consumption. Everything adds up to manufacturers being able to make the same chip a lot easier/cheaper or a faster chip for the same costs.
     
  12. HTC

    HTC

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,240 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    303
    They're planning 450 mm wafers!

    Read this.
     
  13. v-zero Guest

    It is cheaper (due to the mathematics of yields in producing semiconductor dies) to produce two smaller chips and place them on one PCB than to produce one larger chip, even if the sum of the transistors is equal in both cases... Q.E.D.
     
  14. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,691 (11.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,664
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    DarkMatter says thanks.
  15. DarkMatter New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Ok I've seen some of the videos on that link and these 2 explain the thing very well. It's very easy to know why they are round after seeing the secon one, and actually understanding in the end how they make them and specially how they make sure the silicon is pure:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWfCqpJzJYM&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWVywhzuHnQ&feature=related

    EDIT: Anyway it's not because they spin while they "plant" suff in them, but quite the oposite from what I've understood. It's while they remove the remains and they could be square for that purpose. I had already taken into account they could make them spin to take those remains out, but square wafers could spin too, it would be just not as easier. :) They have to be round because of how the silicon bar is created though, and I didn't know that. I like learning this kind of things. :D
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 19, 2008
    HTC says thanks.
  16. razaron

    razaron

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,107 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    177
    Location:
    london
    oh oh i have a brilliant comparison of nvidia to ATI. nvidia is a shelby gt500 with good old muscle and ati would be ATI would be a lexus LS 460 a car that can park itself but would lose in a race with a shelby gt500. now hows tha for a car comparison.

    ps. btarunr you would have made a brilliantly chavy sentence if you said "i is serious cat now." :D
     
  17. Assimilator

    Assimilator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    621 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    South Africa
    Who wants to bet that NV are going to skip the jump to 55nm and go straight to 45nm, a la Intel?
     
  18. DarkMatter New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    I thought the same and that thought was kinda strengthened by the fact that TSMC announced they were ready for 45nm and how Nvidia preffers bigger jumps ala Intel, as you said. But I don't think they are doing that, Nvidia also likes using proved technologies and GT200b is said to come really soon. Plus I think 55nm is already said to be GT200b's fab process.

    But yeah, the posibility still remains, I wouldn't bet my leg though.
     
  19. v-zero Guest

    It's extremely unlikely due to the complexity of gt200, making it on 65nm is already giving horrible yields...
     
  20. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,691 (11.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,664
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India

    No, I wouldn't

    [​IMG]

    See, don't I look serious?™

    See, they polish the wafers when they're rotated at high-speeds. Could you do that with squares? Next time, hide the rick-roll in a bundle of links, don't make it obvious, I didn't fall for that last link.
     
  21. spud107

    spud107

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    1,194 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    131
    Location:
    scotland
  22. candle_86 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,916 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    233
    but not as efficient as both cores have to then split resources at that point and loose a little power than a single core setup
     
  23. Megasty New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,263 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    The Kingdom of Au
    When I said bet the farm I was referring to this series. It might lose & lose big seeing how things are going but NV loves being the fastest, biggest, loudest, whatever & won't take losing lying down. I just hope they don't go crazy & make a $1200 GTX280 GX2 or some other sick bs to brag about :shadedshu


    That's why I don't ever click on youtube links from these goofy forums...NEVER :D
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2008
  24. DarkMatter New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Yes you could use the same technique except on the edges, that BTW I don't know why they have to polish them. You could polish them with another technique, it would be more complex but could benefit in the end price of the chips. Of course because of the way they create the wafers they can't be square, but I don't think polishing would be a problem.

    About the link I made it obvious because I wanted it to be obvious, that was my joke.

    EDIT: BTW is that cat photoshoped? lol
     
  25. DarkMatter New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    I never do, that's why bt made such an achievement. :ohwell:
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page