1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

B-2 to L-2 Stepping For 2MB Conroes

Discussion in 'News' started by malware, Dec 18, 2006.

  1. malware New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,476 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    [​IMG]

    Intel is initiating a B-2 to L-2 stepping conversion for Intel Core 2 Duo processors E6300 & E6400 (Conroe) and Dual-Core Intel Xeon processors 3040 & 3050 (UP Xeon processors based on Conroe) where they will undergo the following changes:
    • New S-Spec and MM numbers for the converting products
    • CPUID will change from 6F6 to 6F2
    • Extended HALT power specification will reduce from 22 Watts to 12 Watts
    • Die size optimized for manufacturability
    • Minor visible difference between the B-2 and L-2 packages; see below for a visual comparison
    • L-2 package is pin compatible with B-2 package
    Source: VR-Zone
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2006
  2. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,505
    Wow, just wow...I wonder if overclocking potential has been thrown out the window here?
  3. jocksteeluk

    jocksteeluk New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,457 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th buildi
    lol Amd started the power reduction game but it looks like intel is trying yo finish it
  4. Homeless

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,025 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Location:
    USA
    is this good or bad?
  5. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,505
    looks bad to me
  6. kakazza New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Messages:
    470 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Looks good to me, reduction of power consumption is always nice :)
    Also I think it will be cheaper to manufacture since the cache was finally cut.

    wheee~



    "As AMD is stepping in 65nm process soon, its cost efficiency is the biggest advantage for the company to against Intel. As 4MB L2 Cache shared almost 60% of the transistors in Conroe, a cut to native 2MB L2 Cache may help in lower 20% of the cost. In fact, the L2 stepping samples have been sent to mainboard manufacturers in order to update the microcode for BIOS."

    http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/news.php?tid=686996&starttime=0&endtime=0
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2006
  7. jocksteeluk

    jocksteeluk New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,457 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th buildi
    after all this CPU energy consumption reduction why hast GPU's caught up yet?
  8. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,087 (3.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,363
    mines a 6300 b2.
  9. overcast New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    737 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Once they hit the wall, they will follow the way of the CPU. Right now it's cheaper just to crank out large, inefficient dies every 6 months.
  10. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Agreed
  11. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,897 (5.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,419
    Location:
    Florida
    thats why i hope AMD does a good job with ATI im a fan boy of both but im not trying to rag on intel thats my next build anyways. the hope is that AMD will be able to stop the inefficient core thing with grfx by applying some of its processors features like shorter architecture and stuff making it more efficient and productive at lower clocks and power cunsomption. this would benifit both intel and nvidia because once they do the same thing assuming AMD/ATI do it first then bam technology boom.
  12. dsdsdk New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    76 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    if e6300 and e6400 are conroe, what is an Alendale? ;-)
  13. kakazza New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Messages:
    470 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    The E6300 and E6400 which are/were sold up until now are 'crippled' Conroes.
    Means, 2 of 4MB cache disables. So basically the same chip with different multiplier and only 2MB cache enabled.

    Those with 'native 2MB cache' will be the first _true_ Allendales.
  14. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,250 (2.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    978
    does this mean the new chips (l-2) wont oc as well?
  15. Dippyskoodlez New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,061 (1.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    230
    Location:
    Ohio
    This could mean EITHER.

    A revision could provide much more effective use of what power it DOES have, potentially giving great strides to overclocking..

    But then, there could also be things hindering overclocking- the changes in resistors, etc. Could be corner cutting. Could just be a Low power, low clock yield, too. Similar to winchesters. Didn't clock for crap, but ran like an ice cube.

    ALthough if this is only for the super low end 6300/6400, I'd put my bets on lowered overclocking.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page