1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Battlefield 3 Clubhouse

Discussion in 'techPowerUp! Club Forum' started by TheMailMan78, Feb 2, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (1.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,506
    I have no idea what you are getting at with my altered post. It would have made sense to just leave it like it was.

    Start Steam
    Start Origin
    Start your web browser
    Then start BF3

    Seems like way to much just to play a game on steam if that turns out to be the case. But lets not put our carriage before the horse. What you posted would be before steam was included. Lets see if that remains if it's announced that steam will also provide BF3. A what if scenario could be:
    -Start Steam
    -Start Game
    -Game will have main menu and server browser with the option to go to battle log.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2011
  2. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    You can gain access to the dogtags by stabbing those people and taking them. I like SPECACT as it allowed me to keep multiple loadouts at the ready. While nice, once the primary weapons are set right, repurposing a kit is pretty quick with the slide menu.
     
  3. TimSad

    TimSad New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    You always have your dogtags. It's just that whenever someone knifes you, they obtain a set of your personally customized dogtags(which you can always re-customize).

    I've already pre-ordered BF3 from Origin and I also plan on pre-ordering the retail copy from BestBuy. I'm really hoping that I can mix the exclusive content onto one account(i.e. take my BestBuy copy's SpecAct and put it with my Origin's PWP).
     
  4. GullyFoyle

    GullyFoyle

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    1,386 (0.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,428
    Location:
    Steeler Country
    Most of this is old news for you now. Posted for the slackers.

    uk.pc.ign.com - Battlefield 3 Beta Numbers Revealed

    Six times larger than Bad Company 2.

    US, October 4, 2011
    by Andrew Goldfarb

    Update: Troedsson is referring to the number of simultaneous players, not total players, meaning the twelve million figure is incorrect. The exact number of players in the beta has not been released. Original story is below.

    DICE has confirmed the number of participants in Battlefield 3's open beta.

    In a new blog post General Manager Karl Magnus Troedsson announced that DICE is "seeing six times the number of simultaneous players in the Battlefield 3 Open Beta compared to the Beta for Battlefield: Bad Company 2."

    As spotted by VG247, two million players participated in Battlefield: Bad Company 2's open beta, which means as many as twelve million may have participated in the beta for Battlefield 3.

    "The Open Beta will help us deliver a robust gaming environment from day one," Troedsson wrote. "The fact that Battlefield 3 is clearly our biggest game launch ever by a magnitude of six makes it doubly important to test everything."

    <see site for streaming media>

    Battlefield 3 Beta Guide

    According to Troedsson, the beta is "actually quite early and not representative of the final game."

    "The Battlefield 3 Open Beta is based on software that is more than one month old," he wrote. "We need to test the new back end dedicated server structure we've built. Not only have we built a new game engine, but an entirely new back end system so that everyone can enjoy the benefits of dedicated servers on all platforms. Just like normal procedure when releasing a game, the Open Beta has had long lead times due to testing, certification, and setting up."

    He also wrote that feedback received during the open beta will help to make the final game better.

    "The final game will look, play and sound better than the Open Beta," Troedsson added. "You have helped [make] sure of that."

    Battlefield 3's open beta will run until Monday, October 10th. The final game hits stores on October 25th.

    Scouring the world to bring you the news...

    Some DICE dev updates from the beta forums to keep you in the know...:)
    Re queues:
    http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/forum/threadview/2826551139121049299/

    And about the squad issue:
    http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/forum/threadview/2826564925959337112/1/

    and
    http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/forum/threadview/2826564925959337112/2/

    Quote:

    techspot.com - Battlefield 3 Beta Performance Test

    <follow link above to see original article with all charts and graphs>

    By Steven Walton on October 4, 2011
    Editor: Julio Franco

    Easily one of the most demanding video games released last year, Battlefield: Bad Company 2 featured stunning graphics with real-world damage and excellent gameplay. Still upon release the shooter was very buggy, so much that it delayed our performance article. Built around the Frostbite 1.5 engine, the game was eventually patched up to become a very popular online FPS having sold in excess of 9 million copies.

    Battlefield 3, the latest in a long line of Battlefield titles is likely the most anticipated game of 2011. Using the new Frostbite 2 engine the game promises to deliver jaw dropping visuals coupled with fast paced action packed fun.

    The gorgeously crafted video teasers have certainly helped the cause throughout the year. Battlefield 3 has huge momentum behind it and the cross-platform beta will hopefully serve developers towards a solid release next October 25th. After all, between the mandatory Origin PC download and the lack of private servers (a standing trend these days), no one is up for a troublesome laggy connection when trying to frag on launch day.

    Battlefield 3 will feature both single and multiplayer modes, though the beta is only providing access to the multiplayer portion of the game. The beta includes a single map called “Operation Metro” and the only game mode supported on this map is called rush. There are password-protected servers that have access to the Caspian Border map with 64-player support where DICE is testing out vehicles.

    Admittedly we love that Battlefield 3 is using the PC as the lead platform rather than a console. When played on the PC the game will handle 40 more players and will take advantage of the latest computer hardware with support for DirectX 11 and 64-bit processors. As such the recommended system specifications are notably high.

    DICE recommends a quad-core CPU be used along with 4GB of system memory. As for the graphics card a GeForce GTX 560 or Radeon HD 6950 is suggested, meaning that gamers will want to spend around $200 on a modern graphics card to appreciate Battlefield 3. Today we'll take a peak at what's required to play Battlefield 3 as we check out how the beta performs.

    Testing Notes & Methodology

    For testing the Battlefield 3 beta we lined up 18 graphics card configurations across all price ranges. The latest drivers were used for all cards which is important as both AMD and Nvidia released updated drivers specifically for this game.

    Testing Battlefield 3 was somewhat of a nightmare due to the clumsy system used to find games which relies on an external web browser. Rather than feature an in-game finder Battlefield 3 beta cannot be accessed until the player has found and joined a game. This means it's not possible to change settings until the player is actively playing on a map.

    We used Fraps to measure frame rates during a minute of gameplay from the multiplayer map Operation Metro. The performance was measured from the same spawn point each time following the same path while an average of three runs was recorded.

    Battlefield 3 was tested at three resolutions: 1680x1050, 1920x1200 and 2560x1600. The game was tested using the Ultra and High quality presets which are meant to be the same for the beta, yet we found significant differences between the two.

    When set to Ultra every setting is maxed out with the exception of anti-aliasing post which is set to medium. The anti-aliasing deferred settings is set to 4xMSAA while anisotropic filtering is set to 16x. Other quality settings such as texture, shadow, effects, mesh, terrain and terrain decoration are all set to Ultra.

    The Ultra preset was extremely demanding, so we also tested using the High quality preset. This turned anti-aliasing deferred off and left the anti-aliasing post settings on medium. All other visual quality settings as detailed above are turned to high. We'll be looking for an average of 60fps for stutter-free gameplay.

    Test System Specs
    - Intel Core i7 2600K
    - x2 4GB G.Skill DDR3 PC3-12800 (CAS 8-8-8-20)
    - Asus P8P67 Deluxe (Intel P67)
    - OCZ ZX Series 1250w
    - Crucial RealSSD C300 256GB (SATA 6Gb/s)
    - GeForce GTX 590 (3072MB)
    - GeForce GTX 580 (1536MB) SLI
    - GeForce GTX 580 (1536MB)
    - GeForce GTX 570 (1280MB)
    - GeForce GTX 560 Ti (1024MB)
    - GeForce GTX 560 (1024MB)
    - GeForce GTX 480 (1536MB)
    - GeForce GTX 470 (1280MB)
    - GeForce GTX 460 (1024MB)
    - Radeon HD 6990 (4096MB)
    - Radeon HD 6970 (2048MB) Crossfire
    - Radeon HD 6970 (2048MB)
    - Radeon HD 6950 (2048MB)
    - Radeon HD 6870 (1024MB)
    - Radeon HD 6850 (1024MB)
    - Radeon HD 5870 (2048MB)
    - Radeon HD 5830 (1024MB)
    - Radeon HD 6790 (1024MB)
    - Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
    - Nvidia Forceware 285.38 Beta
    - ATI Catalyst 11.10 Preview

    Ultra Quality Performance

    At 1680x1050 using the Ultra settings we were surprised to find Battlefield 3 to be so demanding. The Radeon HD 6950 averaged just 30fps, while the GeForce GTX 570 was noticeably faster, matching the Radeon HD 6970 with 39fps. The GeForce GTX 580 scored 42fps which is still low for the fastest single GPU graphics card money can buy.

    The Radeon HD 6990 spat out a more respectable 61fps, while a pair of Radeon HD 6970 Crossfire cards were slightly faster with 64fps. The GeForce GTX 590 averaged 67fps, following the pair of GeForce GTX 580 SLI cards that managed an impressive 74fps.

    Increasing the resolution to 1920x1200 hit performance further as the Radeon HD 6950 delivered less than 30fps. The GeForce GTX 580 remained the fastest single GPU card with an average of just 36fps. Dual-GPU solutions performed considerably better, with the GeForce GTX 580 SLI configuration stealing the show once again with 64fps.

    There is no denying that dual-GPU configurations are a must at 2560x1600 using Ultra settings. The slowest single GPU card we tested, the Radeon HD 6950 averaged just 20fps. The GeForce GTX 570 also managed 21fps while the GeForce GTX 580 was slightly faster with 23fps.

    Even the Radeon HD 6990 scored a mere 34fps while the Radeon HD 6970 Crossfire cards and GeForce GTX 590 were matched at 36fps.

    High Quality - 1680x1050

    Reducing the visual quality from the ultra to high drastically helped to improve performance. Here the Radeon HD 6950 is now able to average 47fps at 1680x1050, while the GeForce GTX 570 managed 51fps allowing it to match the Radeon HD 6970.

    The GeForce GTX 580 was king of the single GPU cards with 58fps making it 14% faster than the Radeon HD 6970. Further down the chart we find the GeForce GTX 560 Ti averaging 43fps making it slightly faster than the 42fps of the Radeon HD 6870.

    Budget-minded cards such as the Radeon HD 6850, 5830 and GeForce GTX 460 still struggled to deliver playable performance when using the high quality settings at 1680x1050.

    High Quality - 1920x1200

    Now at 1920x1200 the GeForce GTX 580 was able to average 50fps, followed by the GeForce GTX 570 with 46fps. The Radeon HD 6970 was slightly slower with 45fps. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Radeon HD 6870 struggled with 36fps, while the Radeon HD 6850, 5830, 6790 and GeForce GTX 460 all rendered less than 30fps.

    High Quality - 2560x1600

    Not unlike previous results we find that the 2560x1600 resolution calls for a dual-GPU solution, even with the high quality preset in use. The GeForce GTX 580 averaged just 34fps, while the GeForce GTX 570 and Radeon HD 6970 averaged 31fps. South of those graphics cards there is nothing worth talking about.

    This time the Radeon HD 6990 outgunned the GeForce GTX 590 by 4fps with an average of 57fps. The Radeon HD 6970 Crossfire and GeForce GTX 580 SLI configurations both averaged 64fps.

    CPU Scaling and Performance

    Overclocking your Core i7 processor is not going to help deliver more performance in Battlefield 3 according to our test using a single GeForce GTX 580 card. We observed that a 49% increase in clock speed for the Core i7 allowed for a mere 6% increase in frame rates.

    Processors that only support 2 threads will take a hit as our Phenom II X2 560 delivered 42fps, almost 20% slower than a similarly clocked Phenom II X4 processor. However we were surprised by how well dual-cores performed when compared to other recently tested games.

    Games such as Hard Rest, Deus Ex: Human Revolution, The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings and Crysis 2 saw a massive difference in performance between dual and quad-core processors. For example, in Deus Ex dual-cores were 43% slower than their quad-core counterparts.

    For the most part Battlefield 3 doesn’t appear to be all that CPU demanding, at least this is what we can tell from testing the multiplayer portion that the beta allows us to test. We'll be keen to revisit these results once the full version of the game is released.

    Conclusion

    Battlefield 3 certainly looks like an impressive game though to be honest between testing and the frustrating setup process for each iteration, I've not had much of a chance to play it fully. From what I was able to gather, there is still much to be done. The lack of an in-game server browser is troubling, while the inability to change any settings without being in a game and spawned is just down right foolish.

    Of course, there's a beta for a reason and we have to try and treat it as such. The night after the beta went live our editor Matthew DeCarlo organized a Friday Night Fragfest (we host such an event every Friday night), so I felt it was best to ask him about his impressions of the game.

    Matt felt the game's graphics were great -- especially if the final version is going to be even better -- and that the audio was fantastic. However the gameplay could only be described as buggy. There were problems that caused people to glitch into things they shouldn't have, while the hit detection is also very poor. Matt wasn’t keen on the beta map either or the game mode which required too much crawling around and he went on… The menu system is best described as a cruel joke and he found the chat box oddly placed at the top and somewhat to the right of the screen making the chat UI feel amateurish.

    In a nutshell, initial impressions on gameplay are not great but this is a very limited beta, so we will leave it at that. Still it's scary to think how much work DICE has yet to get done in less than a month for Battlefield 3 to succeed.

    As for my impressions on how well the game performs, BF3 certainly looks great when using the high quality settings but I'm not sure the visuals justify ~50fps out of the GeForce GTX 580 at 1920x1200 and 45fps from the Radeon HD 6970. The ultra settings are not fully developed so I won't comment on them.

    For a game that was seen utilizing six threads quite efficiently, we were pleased to see that the dual-core Phenom II X2 was just 20% slower than a similar configured quad-core processor.

    It's been nice to see AMD and Nvidia competing so aggressively to deliver improved support and compatibility for Battlefield 3. Testing revealed that both Crossfire and SLI worked well, though every now and then flickering glitches were noticed when using either technology. A large number of gamers are reporting flickering issues with single GPU configurations as well, so this is another issue that will needed to be addressed before the game is released.

    The Battlefield 3 beta has somewhat disappointed as we were hoping to see a more polished game just a month away from release. That said we'll reserve final judgment until then and expect a detailed performance analysis once Battlefield 3 is officially released.

    BF3blog.com - Report: EA and Valve in late-stage talks to get Battlefield 3 to Steam

    On October 4th, 2011 in News, Rumor
    According to an anonymous report BF3Blog received from inside Valve, the developer/publisher is currently in late-stage talks with EA in bringing Battlefield 3 to the Steam digital distribution service. The rumor says that Battlefield 3 would be available on Steam just in time for the game’s release on October 25.
    According to the report, EA and Valve are very close to reaching an agreement regarding sales of DLC content, which is the main reason Battlefield 3 is not on Steam: Valve requires that all DLC is sold through Steam, while EA would prefer to sell via its own channels. This was the cause of another EA title, Crysis 2, for being pulled from Steam earlier this year.
    Many PC gamers have lobbied both EA and Valve to put Battlefield 3 on Steam for a while now. It looks like it’ll finally happen soon.
    We’ve reached out to EA and Valve for a comment on this story.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2011
  5. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,922 (5.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,359
    Im wondering if i can still be arsed to play the beta.
     
  6. Boneface

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,492 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    85
    H82LUZ73, random and AlienIsGOD say thanks.
  7. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,175 (7.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,706
     
  8. Evolved

    Evolved New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    352 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    38
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Is there any way I could join this clubhouse and be listed under the members list?

    This is my first time joining a clubhouse on TPU, so I thought I would give it a try.

    I will definitely be buying BF3 on release day! :toast:
     
  9. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,175 (7.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,706
    I need to get a list of names together so I can do them all at once.

    Everyone please PM me if you want to be in the clubhouse.
     
  10. WarhammerTX

    WarhammerTX New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    277 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Location:
    Texas
    no but thanks for the post Ill load them and try them out
     
  11. GullyFoyle

    GullyFoyle

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    1,386 (0.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,428
    Location:
    Steeler Country
  12. 1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,331 (4.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,374
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    I was looking for this menu before, but could not find it. The only one I see is clicking on weapons or your other slots for your kits and fast swapping them. Which usually I set it stone for the most part. But things like bipods, underslung, scopes, it's a bit of a pain to switch out. Though it is nice it remembers it for each specific gun.
     
  13. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,840 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    670
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    I was playing and i got killed and was waiting for a medic and right when i was out of time i got revived and so i could run around and kill people while not be able to be killed game thought i was dead, so i got a lot of knife kills. after the match i got kicked and lost all my progress :( oh well
     
  14. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,175 (7.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,706
    I got all the PM's added. Does anyone else wanna be added before I upload the new list?

    Edit: Front page list updated.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2011
    Virus-j, Delta6326, Nick89 and 4 others say thanks.
  15. AlienIsGOD

    AlienIsGOD

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,484 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,544
    installing now and going to give it a go :D
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. TRIPTEX_CAN

    TRIPTEX_CAN

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,305 (1.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    723
    Location:
    BC.CAN
    That's why I a few times Ive been killed and the kill cam shows a corpse. :wtf:
     
  17. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,150 (1.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    463
    Location:
    Burlington, VT
    Hope it's not too late to get thrown on there. I was in class at work >.<
     
  18. SK-1

    SK-1

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,219 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Location:
    In a Galaxy Far Far...you know the rest.
    Do I remove the original 11.9 profiles first?
     
  19. Zen_

    Zen_

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2010
    Messages:
    494 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    112
    Does anyone else feel like they are moving around in cement shoes in the beta? It's ridiculously slow and clumsy, and the higher damage makes it worse. There's just so much that feels wrong and doesn't work...hope dice is hard at work before this goes gold.
     
  20. ShiBDiB

    ShiBDiB

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,118 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    787
    Location:
    Clifton Park, NY
    Meeee

    Ill re-preorder eventually
     
  21. AlienIsGOD

    AlienIsGOD

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,484 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,544
    well I find Crossfire at least playable now, still a lil choppy at times but im hoping things will be smoother on retail release.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. Wrigleyvillain

    Wrigleyvillain PTFO or GTFO

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,671 (2.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,775
    Location:
    Chicago
    Yeah it was better I think but it's still drops to unplayable frames occasionally. And at random times like on a close up killcam in the subway. Next death was fine; not choppy and like 60 fps. It seems to get worse as I play...
     
  23. random

    random

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,043 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    686
    Wow this got rid of ALOT of the flickering for me.
     
  24. boise49ers

    boise49ers

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    3,284 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    402
    Location:
    Idaho
    No but the enemy looks like he is in fast forward when I'm outside. Trying to track them in a scope is crazy.
    You have to lead them. I'm sure they are gonna get this all worked out , but so far I'm not having much fun.
    They run to fast outside and I can't see jackshit in the tunnel.
    Brought my k/d up from .45 to .50 , but it was like duck hunting.
    You have to lead the A-holes big time.
     
  25. Radical_Edward

    Radical_Edward

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,586 (2.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,927
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    My 5850 handles High settings at 1680 x 1050 no problem. At least 30+ FPS during explosions. Don't know what the heck they are doing wrong.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page