1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Blu-ray Version of '300' Outsells HD-DVD Version 2:1

Discussion in 'News' started by zekrahminator, Aug 14, 2007.

  1. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,114 (3.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    The epic tale of Leonidas and his 300 Spartans who bravely defended Greece from the Persian Empire is now an epic and successful film. In this day and age, it's not surprising to see that 300 was put on both HD-DVD and Blu-ray. Warner Brothers soon proclaimed that 300 was the fastest selling HD-DVD movie ever. However, the Hollywood Reporter has recently (figuratively) burst Warner Brothers' bubble by reporting that twice as many copies of 300 were sold on Blu-ray than on HD-DVD.

    [​IMG]

    Source: 1Up
  2. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,629 (1.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    343
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Cool, I hope Blu-Ray wins this battle.
  3. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    I hope someone wins this format war.
  4. DRDNA

    DRDNA

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    4,761 (1.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    559
    Location:
    New York
    I have not messed with these formats...which is better?:confused:
  5. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    Blu-ray because it has more studios supporting it. Most other specs are the same, except blu-ray can store more, but it doesn't really matter right now.
    DRDNA says thanks.
  6. freaksavior

    freaksavior To infinity ... and beyond!

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,028 (2.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    878
    I hope blu ray dies, sry i'm a anti-fan boy of sony. I can't stand sony's products. they are overpriced and they quality isn't that great of many of their products. I really hope hd-dvd wins this but it's looking like blu-ray will win. :shadedshu

    btw 300 isn't even worth watching let alone in hd :shadedshu:shadedshu
  7. speedy11131 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    120 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York City, USA
    Another thing I think helps Blu-ray is that PS3 supports it, so you get a game system and Blu-ray player in one. And it's (still?) cheaper than a standalone player? (I haven't checked prices for those in a while.) Wasn't there an article somewhere on how Sony was losing money on every PS3 sold because of the fact that PS3 has Blu-ray capability?
  8. DRDNA

    DRDNA

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    4,761 (1.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    559
    Location:
    New York
    I thought the 300 movie was GREAT...I have watched it about 5 times in the past two weeks and will be watching some more as time goes on...so like its all about opinion.
  9. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,820 (6.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,032
    Location:
    Ohio
    This is madness!!
  10. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    I liked 300 to. It was a good movie, just bad ending, the spartans should've at least fought a little more.
  11. TXcharger

    TXcharger New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Messages:
    431 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    SAN ANTONE, TX
    ya... just a terrific movie...

    but all this blu-ray doing good is making it hard for me to decide on a PS3 or 360...
  12. Seany1212

    Seany1212

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    660 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    Location:
    England, UK
    Sony didnt invent blu-ray, it was invented by an incredible amount of companies, its just that sony integrated it into the PS3, so dont go bad mouthing blu-ray due to your hatred of sony, for your information it was invented by: Apple, Dell, Hitachi, HP, JVC, LG, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Pioneer, Philips, Samsung, Sharp, Sony, TDK and Thomson.
  13. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    Don't pick a console based on hd formats. One day the players will be $200 and under and will be much more responsive than a console is now. Just look at it this way....it's a bonus.
  14. v-zero Guest

    This is SPARTA!!!! :rockout:

    Anyway, BD or HD-DVD I really don't care any more. I just rip both and re-encode to archive. With a 360 and a PS3 there's no matter. I do buy HD-DVD over BD when I can...
  15. Nemesis881 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Messages:
    692 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    Dawsonville, GA
    Anti-society eh? Good luck with that battle :nutkick:
  16. Cuzza

    Cuzza New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,318 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    207
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Putting aside the fact that I may be a closet Sony fanboy, this is good news. The sooner one of these formats dies completely the better for everyone. Except maybe Toshiba, we'll see. I'm just pissed off that PS3 is still $1200 in NZ. Grrrrr
  17. freaksavior

    freaksavior To infinity ... and beyond!

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,028 (2.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    878
    Lets see, don't like Apple to much, Hate dell, not a hp fan, dislike all or JVC products, lg make a lot of crappy stuff, Panasonic always felt cheap to me, Mitsubishi, well i have nothing against them. love pioneer, phillips makes ok stuff, love samsung, hate sony, never like TDK either, Hitachi is awesome. Thomson is eh. So out of 14 i like 4

    So yeah, i hate blu-ray.

    ok, i'll stop being a hater now :D
  18. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,221 (2.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    960
    Neither is a better format.

    For all intents and purposes, the formats are IDENTICAL. (data compression of video steam). The only difference is therefore:

    1./ Type/reliability of media
    2./ Extra "feature set"
    3./ Size of disk

    ANSWERS

    1./ HD-DVD is a more reliable media format... blu-ray (unfortunately) isn't as "wear proof" and there have already been recalls of blu-ray disks

    2./ HD-DVD has a more extensive feature set in the minimum specifications. Therefore HD-DVD disks usually have more menu features etc

    3./ Blu-ray is 2x the capacity. But for HD video, and normal 3hr movie, a blu-ray disk will be half empty. Note that due to identical data compression methods, the extra size of the disk can only be used for LONGER movies, or a SECOND movie. You cannot get a "better quality" movie on the same HD-TV. So this extra capacity is not worth it for a single film. After all, 99% of movies are less than 3 hrs, so the only true feature of the extra capacity is a second film on the same disk! (Except for TV soap, where you COULD get twice as many episodes on a disk... )



    At the same price, points 1 and 2 win.

    At a HIGHER PRICE, blu-ray doesnt win 3 for me.

    Hence, IMO, HD-DVD is the winner.
    EastCoasthandle says thanks.
  19. OrbitzXT

    OrbitzXT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,969 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    New York City
    k, your opinion no longer matters to me after reading that :p
    russianboy says thanks.
  20. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Great movie indeed.


    Blu-Rays ace in the hole was its 1080p support that HD DVD couldnt touch. Until recently, newer players, not gen 2s, but the newest ones, support 1080p. Who knows, HD and Blu might get back together and merge into one.
  21. jocksteeluk

    jocksteeluk New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,457 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th buildi
    Sony and Samsung are the creators and guardians of the Blu-ray format with the rest just being the backers of the format.
  22. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,505
    That's actually not true. The studio support is there but they are not releasing that many movie titles. But don't take my word for it, look here. Before you post you better find out which movies are already under Sony and which are backers.
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2007
  23. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,505
    Not true, the backbone of Blu-Ray is PS3 not stand alone players. Look here and here for details.
  24. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,629 (1.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    343
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Actually, stand alone Blue-Ray players have many more options than the PS3 version. As far as the movie 300 goes, they stretched the truth and didn't make a good story line at all. However, 300 is an AWESOME action movie!
  25. anticlutch

    anticlutch New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    995 (0.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    SoCal
    I would say the 360 if and only if you can find one that doesn't die on you. I just bought a 360 yesterday and it's already starting to give me crap so I'm going to the store tomorrow and getting an exchange for a PS3.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page