1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Buffalo TeraStation Pro 6 TB NAS in the works

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 19, 2008.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    27,678 (11.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,418
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Buffalo is preparing a new NAS system, the 6 TB TeraStation Pro. The system has four drive bays, with four pre-installed 1.5 TB hard drives. These drives can be configured in RAID 0, 1, 5 and 10 modes. An LCD displays the system's activity. It has one gigabit ethernet interface and two USB 2.0 ports The unit measures measures 170 (W) x 235 (H) x 310 (D) mm. Buffalo will start shipping this unit later this month and ask an estimated US$2080 for it.

    [​IMG]

    Source: TechConnect Magazine
  2. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    41,685 (11.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,213
    Hmmm, interesting that it has 1.5TB drives.


    Pity no E-sata, with 4x drives in RAID 0, gigabit will be the speed bottleneck.
  3. kakazza New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Messages:
    470 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    eSATA and NAS don't go together. N is for NETWORK. Unlike your external storage cage.
    Also, why would you want to quadruple data loss with RAID0?


    Doesn't Datarobotics already have a 6TB NAS?
  4. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    41,685 (11.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,213
    well, giga and E-sata would make a nice combination :)
  5. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    27,678 (11.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,418
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    On a PC with the same 4 drives in RAID 0, the array would offer an average transfer rate of ~330 MB/s. Imagine if the NAS is made to do that, and with a single 1 Gbps line, it won't give you any advantage of a 4 drive RAID 0. The max a 1 Gbps line can give you, is 128 MB/s. Bummer.

    So there's no reason for you to set up a RAID 0, it will (mathematically) increase risk of data loss, while not giving you the performance gain expected.
  6. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    41,685 (11.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,213
    well hey, they include USB 2.0. you think gigas bad, consider the speeds off that
  7. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,776
    Speed wouldn't be the only reason to RAID0. Not losing any storage space, and having a single large volume would be a benefit.
  8. DanTheBanjoman SeƱor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Why is that interesting? They've been available for quite a while now. Funny thing is that they increased in price over the last week though. Was planning on buying a few, though not when they increase in price like they do atm. Thinking of just buying a few TB drives for my new server instead.
    eSATA is available on several NAS devices, I fail to see the point of it though, unless they offer a nice case with multiplexer. Only then would it have value over USB. Of course it should support multiple arrays that way, ie separate array for the cage.


    Losing storage space or losing data... hmmm. Seriously, if you make a storage system you don't want it to be unreliable. Speed is the only reason for RAID 0, if you want 100% drive usage use separate volumes.
  9. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    27,678 (11.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,418
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Isn't size of individual drives abstract anyway?
  10. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,776
    Hey, I never said is was practical. Just that it could be another reason to use RAID0.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page