1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 13, 2011.

  1. alexsubri

    alexsubri New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,391 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    199
    [​IMG]

    I believe that it will be 50% faster. Just think about it, Intel has been dominating for a while now, I would say since Core 2 Duo came out. That has given AMD enough time to reconstruct their architecture for the new Bulldozer Processor. Just remember who was king of the hill back then (2006) It was the AMD Anthlon64 FX. I believe their flagship processor was around $750-$800. That said AMD has been giving us hints (FX coming back, 50% Rumor, APU, etc...) so it's safe to say that AMD know's what they are doing and will bounce back. My only concern is paying $700-$800 for their enthusiast processor. I wouldn't mind playing $500, but I can pipe dream :) ...I wouldn't be surprised if Bulldozer's Enthusiast chip is factory clocked at 3.8-4.0 ghz
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2011
    de.das.dude and HXL492 say thanks.
  2. Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,177 (1.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    factory clocked @ 4ghz wow :D
  3. amd64skater

    amd64skater

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    611 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Location:
    Jacksonville ,Florida
    i bet they mean its 50% faster than anything current on the market but when it comes out it will be par with intel or slower
  4. Omega

    Omega New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    145 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    Location:
    Sibenik - Croatia
    It's unenviable to see this volume of discussion based on marketing number, and to see so many people holding on to that 50% number like hyena on a rotten bone.

    Guys, we can't possibly know what they meant with that message they sent out to public. As far as I see it, it's got nothing with revealing true bulldozer performance, just pure marketing. A weapon used to start discussions like this one here, to get the people interested and program in their brains that bulldozer is coming, soon.

    But if you read between lines, I'd say AMD has a good product coming. Think about it... one of biggest issue with AMD products has been lack of marketing, and when there was some, it was too passive and Intel marketing guys would run them over even if they had something inferior to work with.

    So to see AMD stand up and say "Yes! We've got a fast product!" is a great thing all by itself, regardless how fast that product is. It means they are finally building up the confidence and spine to stand up to Intel who's been dominating the scene for the past few years, and we would all benefit from a few changes here and there.
  5. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    well if AMD chips dont have the SB and all, we can be ready for an even smaller die size??? No wonder AMD are planning native 16 cores on Bulldozer
  6. JF-AMD AMD Rep (Server)

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Messages:
    163 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    229
    This is not marketing. Marketing comes from AMD. This did not come from AMD.
    bear jesus, TheMailMan78 and Mussels say thanks.
  7. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    These numbers are FUD. However they are fun to talk about in a sane world.
  8. bear jesus

    bear jesus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    Location:
    Britland
    I think that's what we all want right now, we can't have reviews or products to buy so we just want to talk about it to pass the time until it gets here.
  9. Omega

    Omega New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    145 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    Location:
    Sibenik - Croatia
    Every info has a source... how can you be sure someone at AMD didn't receive a task to spread some gossip trough known channels that deal with those things?
    If i were that person, I sure as hell wouldn't pass that info to say TPU without any proof for numbers, cause it wouldn't be published.
  10. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    Dude people publish crap all the time that isn't true. Why do you think the tabloids are so popular. Shock sells.

    [​IMG]
    bear jesus says thanks.
  11. Omega

    Omega New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    145 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    Location:
    Sibenik - Croatia
    True.
    But from past experience, lots of that crap turns out to be true when that product is launched.
    I'm not saying that this info is true or bs, I'm just saying it's better for us that they're writing in positive way, rather than negative.
  12. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,393 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    560
    Location:
    AZ
    wait for the benchies.

    I fear that bulldozer will be quite a bit fater than current amd chips, but like the 69XX series will be crushed by the even higher expectations placed on it by bad marketing. So the launch will be deemed a failure despite having a nice boost over previous gens.
  13. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,839 (6.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,943
    But they aren't saying it will be 50% faster than Intel's offerings at the time of release, they are saying it will be 50% faster than Intel's current offering now, and not even 50% faster than Intel's high end offering only 50% faster than Intel's mid-range 4-core offerings. According to AMD it only beats the 6-core offerings synthetically. Meaning in everything real world use, AMD's next generation Bulldozer 8-core processor doesn't outperform Intels 6-core current generation...

    I hate to say it, but Bulldozer is not the processor that will put AMD back on top.

    That is exactly what they said, no "mean" about it. In fact they said 50% faster than Intel's 4-core processors(the article says 50% faster than a i7 950), it just barely beats the current 6-cores on the market.
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  14. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    well, a TURKISH site says it's 50% faster than Core i7 950

    Now the Core i5 2300 2.8GHz gives equal or more performance than Core i7 950
  15. kirtar New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2010
    Messages:
    42 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Please don't make JF-AMD say it again. AMD is not saying anything apart from what I remember to be a fairly superficial comparison of Interlagos to Magny-Cours.
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
  16. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,900 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    //rant//

    Ive pretty much been an AMD Fanboi due to Intel's ridiculous amount of Platform changes However AMDs best chips are competing with stuff Intel released 2 years ago and now to go forward with AMD you have to go to a new Platform...

    Yes you can use AM3 cpus on a AM3+ board but as far as Ive seen there isn't any other reason to upgrade to an AM3+ board unless your buying a AM3+ cpu.

    So unless AMD can give some type of reason not to switch brands and fast as you have to do a Platform change I can't see any reason to stick with them...

    As of now Intel has the best bang for the buck......

    AMD needs to get something out and SOON or at the very least they need to get some samples out for review...


    //end rant//
  17. JF-AMD AMD Rep (Server)

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Messages:
    163 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    229
    A. I don't leak data, nor would I approve a leak.

    B. We are in quiet period so releasing data about upcoming products would be forbidden.
    Chevalr1c and Radical_Edward say thanks.
  18. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,886 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
    Is this the same quiet period as with the first phenoms? :(

    Don't get me wrong the K10 core was not bad, it had a 15-20% advantage over K8 at the same clock but it was just poorly implemented (big die for 65nm, lots of transistor leakage, weak OC-er TLB bug) and couldn't compete. I sure hope we're not in for another Phenom and that GloFo's 32nm process is healthy.
  19. bear jesus

    bear jesus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    Location:
    Britland
    I assumed quiet period was meant as in it's too far from the launch to really start hyping it and the basic information is out there so its just time to wait until marketing ramps up before the chip and platform release.
  20. TAViX Guest

    when is the release date?!?
  21. bear jesus

    bear jesus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    Location:
    Britland
    The only things i have read about the release date is first half of this year and I'm sure i have seen the second quarter mentioned somewhere, i don't think a specific date has been released yet.
  22. alexsubri

    alexsubri New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,391 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    199
    Sometime in Feb
  23. JF-AMD AMD Rep (Server)

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Messages:
    163 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    229
    Q2 for client, Q3 for server. It is in my blogs.
    Radical_Edward, TheMailMan78 and Bo$$ say thanks.
  24. Bo$$

    Bo$$ Lab Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    5,307 (2.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    867
    Location:
    London, UK
    are these performance increase a average or a specific task?
  25. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    That is in my brain server too :p
    Benches!!!!!! PLSSSSSSS!!!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page