Discussion in 'Games' started by natr0n, Aug 8, 2012.
Meh. They took this game in a new direction. A COD set in the future is definately weird. I don't think it's for the good of the series imo, its just to be different than all the other 5 or so CODs that have come out. Anyway, I stopped caring after MW1, so this game means nothing to me.
I mean it doesnt look all that good.. but ill probably get stuck buying it so i can play with my console bound friends.
I didn't buy MW2 until it was $5, Andy I'm currently waiting for BO to get to $5, though I'd maybe pay $7. Then I'll wait for MW3, BO2, etc to get super low too. I don't anticipate it being all that great or innovative, despite some changes seen here, but it could be worse...
The futuristic direction is just not doing it for me and since I tend to play COD on my PS3 due to console bound friends I don't see myself getting this until next summer at the earliest.
I love how many pc gamers always have console bound friends lol. They just haven't seen the light yet but they may in time :shadedshu
But like you say Dark no rush in picking this up
Looks good graphically I think, and looks like Treyarch has taken CoD to different direction that might give CoD a fresh look again. I know I won't spend $60 on a CoD game though.
I honestly think CoD should have just kept with WWII and then just stopped.
I'm about as excited for this as I am for Mists of Pandaria.
Looks just like Rage.....
I'd play this if the developers paid me to do so.
I will pass on this
Separate names with a comma.