Discussion in 'Games' started by TheMailMan78, May 31, 2010.
Yeah Ill end up buying it but look at those textures. Man they suck.
Is that actual gameplay graphics?
If they are then I will be more than pleased even though the game is gonna suck (Treyarch ;[).
Yeah it look like they used the same engine........AGAIN! I hate activision for what they have done to CoD.
As much as Treyarch has disappointed me, I'm looking forward to it. I'm starting to have withdrawals from not having 'fresh' CoD game play.
u kno, i always found it interesting that CoD MW2 still uses dx9 and the graphics are still right up there with dx10 titles. And this CoD looks even better yet still uses dx9....kinda makes me think that dx10 was dam near pointless excluding titles like crysis, stalker series. I mean if they'd said this was dx10 would anyone dispute it? doubtful.
Goodbye MW2. hello Black Ops.
Woop! I'm looking forward to it.
Treyarch did good with cod5 imo nazi zombies was fun and the campaign while short was good no reason why they would screw this up.
Next after this I want something new not MW3....
Looks alright to me, never been about the graphics for me. I'm still playing Counter-Strike 1.6 because it's a GOOD GAME, not because it's pleasing on the eyes. If i wanted to please my eyes I'd go to a strip club.
Haha, great quote. But still depends on the game.
Black Ops looks alright, CoD has changed a lot in recent years and it will never get as good as MW1 was but y'no, times change.
Graphics wise game looks great, engine is old, but imho realy powerful, as for gameplay... Will not give hopes up, probably will be just a good shooter within 7.5-8.0 from 10 range.
This series died after COD4 but thanx for posting
Im pretty sure it uses opengl, for graphics rendering. Since it is a quake3 idtech2 engine...minorly modified of course
IMO Treyarch did a great job with WaW. I can only speak of the console version, but whenever there were bugs coming up in multiplayer they squashed them as fast as possible and really supported the title.
This looks pretty good, just a shame it's another Activision game, so I won't be buying it.
I'm buying it ....For sure
Treyarch rules Ive liked them more than IW They offered twice the game with WaW than IW did with MW1&2 combined The only problem I had with WaW was Punk buster But after IW.net Punk Buster looks to be a much shinier Turd
From the multiplayer players...i think a bit if disagreement is in order. They only did the game justice on the PC 6 months or so after release? By then, my clan at least, had moved back to COD4.
its because everything is static and doesnt move, so they get better performance and can make the visuals 'just right'
when you blow up a car in MW1, its only got two models - intact and blown up, and they cover it in fire when they change. Grass/trees dont move, objects dont get destroyed (but at least bullets pass through em ), lighting is static... and so on
full zombie mode=day one purchase for me
bout time we got some COD pics. probably wont be that great, maybe the single player but multiplayer will fail in comparison to you know what.
Separate names with a comma.