1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

CM Hyper 212x or Thermalright Venomous X RT SB-E

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by N3trox, Jun 7, 2013.

  1. N3trox New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2013
    Messages:
    89 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Which of these coolers are better? I'm going to use it to OC my Phenom II x4 970 to 4.2-4.4 GHz. Would both of these be enough?
  2. Jetster

    Jetster

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,333 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,632
    Location:
    Oregon
    Cm 212 evo
  3. N3trox New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2013
    Messages:
    89 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    X model is the same price and they say it's fan is upgraded? Why not to go with Hyper 212x?
  4. RCoon

    RCoon Forum Gypsy

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    5,335 (7.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,061
    Location:
    Gypsyland
    X Model is a crap version of what the old version used to be. They took a cooler design and made it worse by using a cheaper method.
    Hyper 212 Evo is just plain excellent value for money.
    Or buy the older version of the X Model, though I doubt it will fit.
  5. N3trox New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2013
    Messages:
    89 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
  6. N3trox New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2013
    Messages:
    89 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
  7. natr0n

    natr0n

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,582 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    786
    I prefer Thermalright coolers

    The 212 evo direct touch looks efficient though.
  8. m1dg3t

    m1dg3t

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,246 (1.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    Location:
    Canada
    Venomous X with a good fan, or a pair, is a beast HSF! Can be a bit noisy though...

    Either would suffice TBH :toast:
  9. N3trox New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2013
    Messages:
    89 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Pair of fans would be a bit high for me. I'm close to cm hyper212x for now. So i,m ordering in a couple hours? Other opinions would be appreciated...
  10. Octopuss

    Octopuss

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    753 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Location:
    Czech republic
    I have the EVO. There's nothing better you can get for the money. Stock fans usually suck, so I replaced the one supplied with it with one of the new Noctua ones.
  11. AlienIsGOD

    AlienIsGOD

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,402 (1.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,441
    have to agree with everyone else, Hyper 212 is the cats meow for budget orientated wallets. I slapped an extra fan on mine (will be purchasing 2 matching fans at some point) and my 3570K @ 4.2ghz idles at 38C and doesnt go over 62C full load on WCG.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,099 (5.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,943
    Location:
    Home
    Venomous X RT is quite a bit better than the 212, so get it if price are the same. Otherwise get the 212
  13. thebluebumblebee

    thebluebumblebee

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,652 (1.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,188
    Don't overlook the TPC-812. Frostytech review.
    xxdozer322 says thanks.
    More than 25k PPD
  14. N3trox New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2013
    Messages:
    89 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Thats like double my budget. Well unforunateĊŸy for me, hyper 212 evo is out of stock. I'm going for hyper 212x. Will replace the fans with 2 noctua's in the future instead of changing the cooler. Sounds good eh? :)
  15. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,276 (2.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,188
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    The X... It's a better EVO!

    It's just awesomeness when the situation forces you to make a decision. I'd go with the X anyway after reading the above.
  16. Ed_1

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    256 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    41
    where are you seeing 212x being sold , I can't even find a review of it .
    Supposedly it was released 6 months ago .
    AlienIsGOD says thanks.
  17. AlienIsGOD

    AlienIsGOD

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,402 (1.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,441
    i dont see it anywhere either, cept for CM website :p
    Crunching for Team TPU
  18. Vario

    Vario

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,067 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    609
    The 212 is nice but the mounting system really sucks. Both of the two I have installed were able to freely wiggle and rotate even if its clamped as tight as it gets.
    Jetster says thanks.
  19. Jetster

    Jetster

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,333 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,632
    Location:
    Oregon
    They do rotate just be careful not to turn it. But i think its a great mounting system. Quality all the way. I hate plastic back plates most coolers have
  20. Octopuss

    Octopuss

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    753 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Location:
    Czech republic
    They would rotate anyway, even if you were able to apply much more force (which I'd love to be able to do, btw!). Luckily it's only by like 2 milimeters, which is not much. You can't physically "overrotate" the thing anyway, because there's a pin sticking out of the base. Guess it's clumsy user safety measure :D
  21. Jetster

    Jetster

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,333 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,632
    Location:
    Oregon
    The ram in the first slot will keep it from rotating if its tall
  22. Octopuss

    Octopuss

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    753 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Location:
    Czech republic
    lol, true as well
  23. George_o/c

    George_o/c

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Messages:
    47 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Greece
    On my old home PC with a Q8400 @ 3.6GHz, I remember using the Xigmatek Loki which was really nice considering its price. Unfortunately, even though I knew the Hyper 212 Evo was outperforming it, I couldn't find it in any Greek store back then :/
  24. N3trox New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2013
    Messages:
    89 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    So i ordered 212X, installed it today. OC'ed my Phenom II x4 970 to 4.0 GHz, 1 hour prime 95 and max temp was 58 degrees. This cooler is so good. Would reccomend it to all... I made a push-pull config with a spare xilence red led fan. Both of them running at 1000 RPM, idle temperatures are 45-46 degrees right now. OC'ed ofcourse.
    George_o/c says thanks.
  25. Widjaja

    Widjaja

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,819 (1.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    636
    Location:
    Wangas, New Zealand
    I would expect this cooler to be more or less the same performance as the Hyper 212+ & EVO with very marginal difference.
    It's the same thing with minor tweaks here and there to make it a new product because people demand new and 'improved' which comes in the form of marketing gimmicks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page