1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Come on, picture signatures! Please?

Discussion in 'Comments & Feedback' started by wtf8269, Apr 9, 2006.

?

Should we have picture signatures?

  1. Yes, other forums have them and they're sweet.

    12 vote(s)
    54.5%
  2. No, I'm glad TPU doesn't have them; they're annoying.

    7 vote(s)
    31.8%
  3. I don't care, why did you make a thread about this?

    3 vote(s)
    13.6%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. wtf8269

    wtf8269 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,495 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Ohio
    Am I the only person that really thinks we should be able to have sigs with an image in it? I emphasize an because anything more than one picture in a signature is annoying. I think something like this would be reasonable: No larger than 800x200, no larger than 100kb, no animations, and only one image.
     
  2. KennyT772

    KennyT772 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,585 (1.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    103
    i agree with no more then 100kb no anamations and one image but 800x200 is huge. there are still forum goers that use 800x600 and that would cause scrolling. lets keep it clean 500 or 550 at the most wide.
     
  3. POGE

    POGE New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,724 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Location:
    In banjo's Goats.
    I do think small ones for people with say, over 500 posts would be nice.
     
  4. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,512 (2.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,143
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    I think for over ppl with 300 posts. But no animations, and say about 100 pixels in height.
     
  5. intel igent

    intel igent New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,641 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    434
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    :toast:
     
  6. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,113 (2.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    sounds good to me...100x550 for people with over 300 posts (hey look I qualify :D)
     
  7. HookeyStreet

    HookeyStreet Eat, sleep, game!

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    7,135 (1.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    523
    Location:
    Great Yarmouth, England
    Yes please :D
     
  8. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,257 (5.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,597
    Location:
    Florida
    yes quite
     
  9. wtf8269

    wtf8269 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,495 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Ohio
    w00t! Let's hope W1zzard is on our side. If bogging the server is a factor I'm sure we could all get our own image hosting.

    I hope you mean 550x100 ;)
     
  10. Sandman New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    140 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Sigs with pictures would be nice, provided they were smallish. They should prolly be hosted off of imageshack or something to avoid soaking up bandwidth needlessly. That or we get avatars. :D
     
  11. POGE

    POGE New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,724 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Location:
    In banjo's Goats.
    I've talked to w1zz about it and he isnt going for it, just thought I would save you guys some time.
     
  12. wtf8269

    wtf8269 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,495 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Ohio
    Meh, I figured. Oh well.
     
  13. POGE

    POGE New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,724 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Location:
    In banjo's Goats.
    Like my new avatar guys? I wanted to make it animated but unfortunatly animated avatars arent aloud either.
     
  14. mikechinym

    mikechinym New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    80 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Malaysia
    i like the picture...
    it give forum more live!
    but for who are connect to the internet by using 56k modem,they should be mad
     
  15. wtf8269

    wtf8269 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,495 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Ohio
    Maybe there could be an option to disable signatures for people? Like if they were still using dial up they could have the option to not view people's signatures.
     
  16. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,113 (2.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    yeah theres an option to disable avatars, so...there should be one to disable sigs if we ever got them. I spent a good couple months without knowing a thing about the avatars here :laugh:
     
  17. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,512 (2.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,143
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    Not going to happen... byfar
     
  18. Thermopylae_480

    Thermopylae_480 New Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    3,686 (1.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    393
    Location:
    Little Rock Arkansas, United States
    I don't want it. It makes the forums a mess. The avatars are more than enough in my opinion, and since the system spec drop down was added, the signature space adds a good place for a message or any additional relevant information you might want to add.
     
  19. G.T

    G.T New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2005
    Messages:
    573 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    The other side of Hell
    +1
     
  20. Thermopylae_480

    Thermopylae_480 New Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    3,686 (1.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    393
    Location:
    Little Rock Arkansas, United States
    Yeah were, still losing though. But at least for now we have W1zzard on our side.
     
  21. spectre440 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    948 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Location:
    Israel
    thank god! i bloody hate those damned things!

    100% agreed.
     
  22. Migons New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2005
    Messages:
    252 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Location:
    Finland
    No, text sigs are enough. If you have something appropriate to your sig, you sure should be able to tell us it by text.
     
  23. wtf8269

    wtf8269 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,495 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Ohio
    Lol, the poll doesn't mean sh!t if you guys have W1zzard on your side. You do have some very valid points though. I agree, now that you've mentioned it, that it pretty much would be pointless with us already having a system specs panel.
     
  24. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,113 (2.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    alright fine, I agree. But would it be too much to ask for bigger avatars? :D drawing in MSPaint in such low resolutions is HARD man lol
     
  25. wtf8269

    wtf8269 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,495 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Ohio
    I have to disagree on that one. Make a large image and then downsize it, or if you want then have someone downsize it for you.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page