1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Core i7 "Haswell-E" Engineering Sample Pictured

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Dec 13, 2013.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,368 (11.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,607
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Here's the first picture of Intel's next-generation Core i7 HEDT (high-end desktop) processor, codenamed "Haswell-E." Based on Intel's latest "Haswell" micro-architecture, the chip will be Intel's first HEDT processor to ship with eight cores, and the first client CPU to ship with next-generation DDR4 memory interface. In addition to IPC improvements over "Ivy Bridge" that come with "Haswell," the chip integrates a quad-channel DDR4 integrated memory controller, with native memory speeds of DDR4-2133 MHz; a PCI-Express gen 3.0 root complex with a total of 40 PCI-Express lanes, and yet the same DMI 2.0 (4 GB/s) chipset bus.

    Built into the LGA2011-3 socket, "Haswell-E" will be incompatible with current LGA2011 motherboards, as the notches of the package will vary from LGA2011 "Ivy Bridge-E." Intel will introduce the new X99 Express chipset, featuring all 6 Gb/s SATA ports, integrated USB 3.0 controllers, and a PCI-Express gen 2.0 root complex for third-party onboard controllers. Interestingly, there's no mention of SATA-Express, which Intel's next-generation 9-series chipset for Core "Broadwell" platforms reportedly ships with; and X99 isn't looking too different from today's Z87 chipset. With engineering samples already out, it wouldn't surprise us if Intel launches "Haswell-E" along the sidelines of any of next year's big-three trade-shows (CES, CeBIT, and Computex).

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: VR-Zone
  2. Nihilus

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    217 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    first things first. what color will it be? oh yeah 1st
  3. The Von Matrices

    The Von Matrices

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,185 (0.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    367
  4. Chaitanya

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    389 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    Pune
    I hope the X99 will be cooler than the current X79, I had couple of issues with X79 during hot Indian summers.
  5. Live OR Die

    Live OR Die

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,894 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    383
    I'm waiting out so i can build my new gaming rig on X99 its so long to wait though.
  6. happita

    happita

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,355 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    394
    Dammit. I was really hoping that Broadwell would support DDR4 and SATA Express. Oh well, I guess my 2500k will still be kicking until Skylake is out. Haswell-E seems a little too much for what I use my PC for (gaming). But kudos to Intel for finally breaking out of its shell and introducing 8-core CPUs. It's about time.
  7. EpicShweetness

    EpicShweetness

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    307 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    30
    Location:
    Ft Gordon
    Now if only the software on games could take advantage of that! Unfortunately my 3570k can do just fine, and should do just fine for a long time. Still what a beast of a CPU!
  8. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    925 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    135
    Location:
    Australia
    Finally I can go back to HEDT. 8 cores and DDR4 sounds worthwhile.
  9. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    I'm sure people with the money will buy this to fap over, and to make others jealous on forums. It's nice but is it really needed for the average user or gamer, I don't think so.
  10. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,241 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,470
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    I don't think people buy them to make others jealous. But these items fall into the category of enthusiast toys, i.e. Benchmarking achievements and also the category of, i'll buy it because I can. I bought into the socket 2011 platform and feel no need to move, so there is also a longevity premium.
    Aquinus says thanks.
  11. west7

    west7

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Messages:
    29 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    it will be to damn expencive
  12. happita

    happita

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,355 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    394
    For as long as I can remember, this is the longest time frame I have ever seen Intel stay on the same socket for any particular platform.
  13. night.fox

    night.fox

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2012
    Messages:
    812 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    387
    Location:
    south korea
    I believe this was because AMD has somewhat "give up" competing intel on there extreme CPU's ( I think).
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. lilhasselhoffer

    lilhasselhoffer

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,577 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    944
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    Finally. Too bad that the enthusiast platform is coming out so much later than the mainstream.

    I give props to Intel for finally jetisoning the SATA II ports entirely. I'm definitely in the boat with everyone criticizing X79 for being one heck of a hot PCH, but that might be because its based on 45 nm technology. Rectifying that shouldn't be a problem, assuming Intel actually wants to push some boundaries...

    I hope X99 brings some dignity back to the high end market. X79 was, speaking on my opinion only, a fail for the high-end. It didn't push any boundaries, it only added extra cores and some connectivity. Those that could use it obviously saw an improvement, but it could have been renamed to CE (Crunchers Edition), and been more accurate than HE (High End).
  15. Live OR Die

    Live OR Die

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,894 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    383
    Yer but i also had a X79 platform i went to haswell because i love new hardware it gives me some thing to do haha, But do i need it no its a want more than a need its more the feeling of your system raping any program or game out there yes i know x79 can do that already but there always that step more.
  16. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,157 (6.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,020
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    I like how people refer to skt2011 as "X79" when the chipset is actually only a small part of the entire platform. Is it perfect? no. Is it adequate? yes. Consider for a moment that skt2011 was designed for servers. More often than not, servers won't use integrated I/O. Dedicated RAID cards amongst other hardware you may need for whatever it will be doing, favors having more PCI-E lanes than anything else.

    I've personally haven't had any issues with the X79 over heating, so I can't relate. I can say that it is pretty nice and convenient to have 40 PCI-E lanes off the CPU though.

    So much hate for a decent platform... If there is anything to complain about (at least with SB-E) is that power consumption is a bit high. Other than that, my 3820 is just as capable as any other quad-core out there at the moment. While it might not be the "fastest" it isn't a limiting factor in anything I do.

    I should also add, at least SB-E/IVB-E has the heat-spreader soldered to the die. Don't need to de-lid that. That's a perk in and of itself.
  17. Landing New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    What's the point? It's only going to be 10-15% faster anyway.

    Without AMD, the CPU industry is dead.
  18. Live OR Die

    Live OR Die

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,894 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    383
    You can blame that on Asus lol. I never had any problem with both my X79 boards i guess it just depends on the board really.
  19. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    Bring it on Intel, we are going to watercool the shizz out of this chip.

    8 cores at 5 GHz :droool:

    This isn't really the same socket as current 2011, it's 2011-3 which has a different pinout and it's not backwards compatible.

    There's also people like me who can actually use all cores available :toast:

    I'd honestly love 12 cores on a single CPU :)

    I thought it like you for quite a good amount of time, until I bought a RAID card with "balls" and never thought about the lack of anything in X79 anymore.

    Having the entire board watercooled makes for a quiet and chilly system :toast:
  20. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    717 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    65
    I haven't had any issues with my Asus P9X79 Deluxe motherboard and Core i7 3930K setup. I'm not ready to move on from it yeat but I might be ready to add an additional system when Haswell-E is released. I wonder if Intel will keep Thonderbolt off this new HEDT as well?

    I actaully have a lot of questions about Haswell-E but I understand its too early for any real answers,....
  21. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,176 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,136
    140W from Intel and no one bats and eye, 125 Watts from AMD and everyone goes crazy, and I am just sitting here feeling like I am taking crazy pills.
    psyko12 and Vinska say thanks.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  22. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,812 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,893
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Based on how 140W Intel or 125 W AMD CPUs overclock, I think the reactions are justified. If you run stock, then, yeah, I feel as you do.


    But...clockspeed is gonna take a dive here, with 8 cores, I suspect. If not, AWESOME!!!

    Hope to have more info soon. ;)
  23. natr0n

    natr0n

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,855 (1.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    945
    This will come with an absurd price.
    Maybe you'll have to pay in organs.
  24. Scrizz

    Scrizz

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,876 (1.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    384
    Location:
    Florida, US
    I have a kidney i can part with. lol :laugh: :toast:
  25. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,403 (1.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,235
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Yeah, I would have posted "OMFD 'DAT TDP", but then I saw Your post. Really, wasn't Intel supposed to be the low power consumption "team" while AMD was pushing "outrageously high" TDPs like 125w?
    I suppose even the Low TDP Saints Intel have problems dealing with the increasing leakage currents of their ever-shrinking process. kekeke...

    Meanwhile, even though I've got a decent OC, I've got a sweet undervoltage which makes my chip run noticeably below its TDP. *shrug* I forgot what point I wanted to make.

    P.S. has the availability & price of DDR4 already good?
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page