1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Corsair Unveils the Force LS Series Solid State Drives

Discussion in 'News' started by Cristian_25H, Aug 21, 2013.

  1. Cristian_25H

    Cristian_25H News Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,620 (4.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,164
    Location:
    Still on the East Side
    Corsair has today announced a new addition to its solid state drive offer, the Force LS Series models which are powered by a Phison controller and make use of Toshiba MLC NAND Flash memory. These SSDs have a 2.5-inch form factor (7 mm high), SATA 6.0 Gbps connectivity, TRIM support, and deliver sequential read/write speeds of up to 560/535 MB/s.

    The Force LS SSDs are backed by a three-year warranty and come in 60 GB ($70), 120 GB ($110) and 240 GB ($200) capacities.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    293
    I think is time for some more PCIe SSDs. This is getting ridiculous. Already ALL new released SATA 3 drives are capped to max ~550MB/s, and this is going on for a couple of years now.
     
  3. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,462 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,188
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Why? Even in RAID-0 1GB/s doesn't make the computer feel any more responsive unless your copying files or doing something that demands a ton of I/O.
     
  4. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    293
    Are you serious ?? Don't tell me that you forgot that the SSD is still the SLOWEST component of a PC/Laptop ??!?

    P.S.

    Play Skyrim or Mass Effect 3 with Ultra-textures at 4096x4096 and tell me about the loading times... ;)
    Rest my case.
     
  5. BarbaricSoul

    BarbaricSoul

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,179 (2.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,055
    Uh, what monitor are you using that is capable of 4096x4096 resolution?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. Sinzia

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    841 (0.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    205
    That's the res of the textures, not of the monitor.

    The higher res on a texture, the better the "item" in game looks: armor, weapons, even the ground.

    Think high-res texture pack.
     
  7. RCoon

    RCoon Gaming Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    7,444 (8.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,574
    Location:
    Gypsyland, UK
    Think 4K textures.
     
  8. Jorge

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    753 (1.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    PCIe SSDs will be taken over the marketplace in the next two years as they are cost effective to produce and have much higher throughput. Obviously their advanatge is only when data needs to be written or read so system gains are based on individual usage.
     
  9. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,739 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    977
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Good game engines stream the texture data so thy don't even need to load levels apart from first time you run the game. So, SSD's become a bit less important...
     
  10. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    293
    The most used engines currently on the market, Unreal Engine 3, HeroEngine or Frostbite Engine, are all streaming textures and data at the beginning of every level, and the higher settings you have the longer it takes for the game to load. I'm speaking from experience here...
     
  11. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,462 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,188
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    ...or maybe because it doesn't need to be? Also just because it is the slowest does not mean that it is inadequate. Also mass storage is always slower than other components that are closer to the CPU in the memory hierarchy.

    You mean when you have to load 2gb worth of textures? 2 seconds vs 4 seconds assuming only disk I/O? Yes, that makes all the difference since you load games more often than you're playing them. :slap:

    Most users aren't playing Skyrim or Mass Effect 3, let alone with 4k textures. There is also a point of diminishing returns. Also I think you would be surprised how much time is spent not actually doing disk I/O when you have an SSD and that most of the time you spend "waiting" is setting up the state of the game and processing anything that needs to be done before hand.

    Adding an SSD makes I/O a much smaller bottleneck and when it's not the limiting factor, you're just wasting your money if your only goal is performance.
     
  12. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    To Hell with the speed or the I/O... why aren't SSDs dropping in price anymore? :|
     
    Aquinus says thanks.
  13. AthlonX2

    AthlonX2 HyperVtX™

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,185 (2.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,668
    artificial flash shortage
     
  14. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,462 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,188
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    This! I would like to be able to buy 4TB of SSD storage for less than 4,000 USD. :banghead:
     
  15. buildzoid

    buildzoid

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,273 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    341
    Location:
    CZ
    You already can the crucial m500 960gb cost sub 700$
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page