typical fanboy statement, I went from an fx-62 to a q6700 and there was no differece in frames on highend games. Only on games I was already havign high frames in. The cpu DOES NOT bottleneck the card in crysis, it's the other way around. A 5000 is plenty capable of 120 frames in that game, but I seriously dobt his 9800gtx can run at that. Now if you;re talking HL2 then you're right the cpu is bottlnecking the card, but really at 200+ frames who cares? I'm really tired of hering the typicall intel fanboy comeout into every post and saying "your AMD is bottlenecking your card" because unless you're planning to run at super high frames it isn't true. AMD's are not that slow. IF he had a P4 he'd still be able to play crysis at reasonable frames (albeit with long load times) Why? because it's the gpu that matters in games NOT THE CPU.
The intel fanboys come out and go "wow look at my 3dmark06 score!" and expect every game to be the same as 3dmark. If that were true, his 9800gtx would look at crysis and laugh going "is that all you got?"
I've run nmy quad at 4GHZ and still not seen an increase from my fx-62 at stock when I game at 1680x1050 with 8x(16x some games)aa and 16xaf. Why? because at that point it's the gpu that is bottlnecking, NOT THE CPU. do me a favor and fire up crysis with your cpu at 3GHZ while runnign fraps and record the frames(leave your gpu settings as they are), then clock your cpu back to stock and do the same thing. your frames won't change.