1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Dell Precision M3800 Goes Official, 3200 x 1800 Display Confirmed

Discussion in 'News' started by Over_Lord, Jul 25, 2013.

  1. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    Last week we had reported that Dell is working on a new power-packed mobile workstation dubbed the Precision M3800. At SIGGRAPH, Dell will take the wraps off their next-generation portable workstation. On their corporate blog, the company confirmed much of the rumored specifications which include:

    • 4th Generation Intel Core i7 quad-core CPU
    • NVIDIA Quadro GPU
    • 16GB RAM
    • QHD+ (3,200 x 1,800) multi-touch display
    • 1TB HDD, or 512GB SSD

    Despite being loaded to the brim, the Dell Precision M3800 will compress everything into a 0.7" thick body, which weighs in at 4.5 pounds. There's still no word on the pricing, but that should slip out soon. Whatever it'll be, it sure won't be cheap.

    [​IMG]

    Source: Dell Community
  2. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,386 (3.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,087
    The biggest gripe isno keypad, on a system like that. No keypad on a 15 inch laptop these days... It might have one though.
  3. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,179 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    280
    I'm guessing its using a Samsung panel, since they already release a laptop with that resolution.
  4. Over_Lord

    Over_Lord News Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    751 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    Manipal
    I'm using a 1600x900 14" display. Wonder how 4x the resolution would feel
  5. matar

    matar

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    63 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Eat that apple with so called highest resolution 2880x1800 MacBook.
    shovenose and tigger say thanks.
  6. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,179 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    280
    Thing is OSX doesn't have scaling problems like Windows have...
    lemonadesoda says thanks.
  7. Solidstate89

    Solidstate89

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    192 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    38
    Location:
    Western New York
    The lack of a Num-Pad is still the biggest problem with this notebook. Dell doesn't seem to realize just how important that is for those us who work with CAD Programs all day long. If I had to input all of my dimensions and constraints using the top row of numbers I'd chuck the damn thing at a wall in less than 15 minutes.
  8. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,242 (2.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    963
    (3,200 x 1,800) I like, now give it to me in a 21" format as a desk monitor. And yes, my GPU can handle that as a desktop resolution and can game at 1600x900 quite well (native pixel scaling)
  9. repman244

    repman244

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,099 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    450
    The drawback is no numpad. It seems Dell made this model as a semi-workstation.
    However this is a new model, so I guess 4xxx and 6xxx models will have it.
    And there are rumors that only the M3800 will have this display, the 6800 will probably only have 1080p.
  10. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,179 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    280
    That's an urban legend. From experience I am telling you that the image it will look like crap, blurry and aliased. :rolleyes:
  11. Black Panther

    Black Panther Senior Moderatorâ„¢ Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2007
    Messages:
    8,558 (3.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,911
    I was hoping that was a 37" monitor... (sans notebook attached ;) )
    hellrazor says thanks.
  12. hellrazor

    hellrazor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,569 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Give me one of these or don't.
  13. theonedub

    theonedub habe fidem

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    7,125 (3.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,656
    Truth. 720 on my 1440 looks awful in games. Honestly can't tell if the same holds true for video.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,242 (2.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    963
    Perhaps you are suffering "consumer" product. I have an Eizo y1600 that does some pretty perfect scaling with y800 input. I just checked this Samsung, and it is OK but yes the scaling is giving me that "analog" not "digital" feeling. I can see some sampling going on in the scaler which could be much better. I guess it is designed as a one-fits-all scaler that doesn't have the best methods for integer scaling. I can imagine a consumer grade nasty y1080 or y1440 doing some nastiness.

    So I guess is depends on the monitor. Thanks for the warning... will check reviews carefully before buying next TFT. :pimp:
  15. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,199 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    973
    Location:
    Miami
    Nope - not true at all... have the retina macbook - and compared the 1440x900 on my native macbook pro to the 1440x900 mode on the Retina in LoL and Xcom, and there is no difference between the two.

    Yes 1440x900 looks more pixelated than 2880x1800, but thats because after seeing something at 2880x1800 everything else looks like sandpaper to your eyes, if you compare native 1440x900 to simulated 1440x900 at 2880x1800 there is no visible difference side by side (the retina still looks better color-wise since its an IPS screen).

    The dell will be the same. On a different note, font scaling in windows 7 is not really an issue 2880x1800 renders just fine, Remote Desktop connection is totally broken though, everything is tiny.

    I don't know what experience you're talking about, but I have them here side by side, and they are identical. Looking at them now I can't believe I used that shitty screen for so long.

    If you don't do a side-by-side comparison, of course the image will look like blurry crap when you downscale... you just went to 1/4 of the resolution as you were looking at something. Your eyes will immediately pick up on the crapification - but that is really what 1440 screens look like - they look like crap.
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2013
  16. theonedub

    theonedub habe fidem

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    7,125 (3.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,656
    Maybe it looks fine when you are dealing with small screens like on the Macbook and this Dell (where pixel density is high), but the three of us were discussing how this would work on something larger, like a 21" screen Lemon mentioned.

    I've tested this many times on my U2713HM UltraSharp, and by no means does a game rendered at 720P look fine scaled to 1440P (4x pixel bump, 4:1 pixel scaling).

    Nevermind, just saw your edit- you're one of those people. Thanks for wasting my time.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,199 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    973
    Location:
    Miami
    So sorry to waste your precious time.

    I was just saying that this would play a role. Get a real 27 inch that renders natively at 720P - a Monitor - not a HDTV - if you can even find one and then compare.
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2013
  18. theonedub

    theonedub habe fidem

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    7,125 (3.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,656
    You don't understand what we are talking about. People seem to think that since we have a 4:1 pixel ratio, the 1/4 res image will look just as good as the native resolution when scaled up. That is not the case.

    I get that you are saying 1440x900 on a 15" display looks the same as 1440x900 scaled on your 2880x1800 display- but that's not what we are talking about at all.

    Your post goes off in some wild MacBook Retina tangent that no one was interested in.
    phanbuey says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  19. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,199 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    973
    Location:
    Miami
    I understand exactly what you are talking about - the reason i brought up the retina was because that is the most recent experience I have had on this panel.

    If you take a 27 inch MONITOR (since TV's will smooth out the 720P image) at 720P native, and then compare it to a 27 inch monitor running a 720P image on a 1440P it should be exactly the same unless there are upscaling issues on the monitor.
  20. theonedub

    theonedub habe fidem

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    7,125 (3.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,656
    Again, thats not what we were talking about. Thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  21. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,199 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    973
    Location:
    Miami
    ok then... please clarify - you are posting in a thread about a 15" laptop display and you said:

    "Truth. 720 on my 1440 looks awful in games. Honestly can't tell if the same holds true for video."

    its so clear what ur talking about :slap:
    shovenose says thanks.
  22. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,179 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    280
    Aaaa....NOUP!

    I tested this with a 40" 1080p native TV and a 40" 2160p native TV at the local store. While the pictures and UltraHD movies were looking way way better on the 2160p TV, very sharp and detailed, when it came to standard HD TV or games things changed dramatically. The HD TV signal was looking almost identically on both TVs, but the 1080p game was looking so much worse on the 2160p TV.
    So no more legends please.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page