1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Diamond Radeon HD 4870 512 MB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Jun 30, 2008.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,645 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,382
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2008
    philbrown23 says thanks.
  2. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715 (6.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,864
    I really hope this makes nVidia start dropping their prices accross the board. I'd love to see the 9800GX2 in the $325 range to compete with this card. $150 8800GTS 512MB cards would be nice too.

    I'm glad we are finally starting to see some great competition, that means lower prices and better performance for the customer.
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  3. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,919 (7.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Wow look at those scores.. That card is a BEAST. I cannot wait to see what the X2 can do!
  4. nflesher87

    nflesher87 Staff

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    4,499 (1.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    487
    Location:
    Texas
    great to see ATI respectfully competing once again :)
  5. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,635 (1.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Location:
    Tennessee
    I would think the would drop the price on the GX2 mainly because the 3870 X2 is an equal if not better card. When the 4870 X2 hits ATI will hold the crown in both the 1GB and 2GB range.
  6. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Eh, the gx2 is still a more powerful card. The 3870x2 may hold a better value, crossfire may sometimes work better than sli, but side by side the gx2>x2. And the 4870x2 will just have 1gb of vram I believe (2x512mb), but unless nvidia has got a trick up their sleeve, it should take the performance crown.
  7. OnBoard

    OnBoard New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,044 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    379
    Location:
    Finland
    Worst idle temps ever. (like gaming 24/7 and still hotter)

    They better fix the idle voltage & clocks, then it will be a good card.

    edit: seems fan speed tuning would helps a lot already (not that ^above^ wouldn't help also)

    Last edited: Jun 30, 2008
  8. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,635 (1.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Lol, so you'll pay nearly 200$ more for a graphics card that performs only slightly better. :slap::laugh: Therefore, the X2 should be considered better.

    Anyhow, back on topic.
  9. Nkd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    93 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    How did you manage an 1150 on the memory clock, that is 4600mhz for gddr5 chip, lol. I can do 4400 as that is the highest CCC would allow, but with the fanspeed hack the card runs nice and cool, idles at 49c with fan at 40% and load at 61-65c, that is with the overclock at 790 and 1100 for the memory.
  10. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Look at w1z's charts, it's about 20% better. You consider it however you want, what I'm saying is nvidia still had the performance crown, discluding price. Now it seems as though the 4870x2 will be the top card in the bunch. I personally wouldn't pay over $300 for a card, and favor performance/price, but that's not really relevant to what I said :slap:. :)
  11. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,635 (1.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Why would I consider it, I have 2 4850s benching a 19k :p
  12. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    :laugh: I suppose that's a response.......:wtf: Anyway nice cards indeed, keep 'em comin ati. :)
  13. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,635 (1.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Location:
    Tennessee
    I agree the GX2 is "slightly" better performing, but not for it's price tag is what I'm saying. Which is why I was agreeing with newteckie. :laugh:
  14. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715 (6.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,864
    Actually, when you exclude the low resolution CPU limitted benchmarks that were put out there, the 9800GX2 was about 20% better overall than the HD3870x2. Surprisingly, $600 is right about 30% more than $450. The HD3870x2 was certainly not a better or even equal card. Price to Performance it was pretty equal it was actually even better, but performance wise alone it was not equal. Price to performance always goes down drastically as performance goes up though, so it is really not that surprising. That is why most people stay under $300 when buying graphics cards.
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2008
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  15. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Simply amazing. Wtg ATI. Great review as always W1zz.
  16. pentastar111

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    993 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Location:
    Los Angeles...U.S.A
    Sweet card!
  17. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,356 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    550
    Location:
    AZ
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814261010
    cheapest 9800gx2
    420$

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127326
    cheapest 3870x2
    290$ (240$ after mail in)

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814103061
    diamond 4870 (they're all teh same price right now)
    310$

    The gx2 bests the 4870 by 11% but costs ~25% more
    the gx2 bests the 3870x2 by ~ 15% (yes I know thats not an accurate way of doing it but whatever) but costs 31% more before mail in. (I'm not a big fan of mail ins so I won't show that percentage)

    so i dunno, but If I were looking for a card that gave me desired performance and I had the money, that extra 11% would be worth it to me over the 4870 which I guess happens more often than considering price vs performance. sure a ferarri doesn't beat a corvette by the price ratio difference, but if you had the money you'd still buy one.

    quite an interesting realization for me. since I've been a price/perf advocate.
  18. NU(GFX)T

    NU(GFX)T New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    39 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Nice review!

    The Quake4 scores are amazing.

    BTW W1zzard I think it's time to use widescreen resolutions in techpowerup benchmarks. Most of the people have already moved to widescreen monitors and I think TP should too.
  19. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    Fast. FAST. I want one D:
  20. candle_86 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,916 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    233
    hmm i can see a response from Nvidia now, the 9800GX2 stays in production but the cost is lowered to 300 even.

    Also i can see one other thing, the GTX280 and 260 fall in price.

    Total cost to make the card is about 300-350 from what i gathered so the GTX260 could fall to 320 or so and GTX280 to 400-450 and become the king once more and for the preformance we see it would be worth it. I fully expect a response from Nvidia, we all know they like to compete.

    Also the GT200B should be out soon and should lower costs even more than now. What im waiting for is say a GTX250 with a cut down 384bit bus but full shaders just clocked lower, the cut is bus width would save money and allow maybe a 250 card
  21. jaydeejohn New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    127 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Nice numbers. Great review. Heres some things I like and Id like to see. Going over all the reviews on the 4870, I really like this one, as it contains one of few at lower resolutions. However, what Id like to see, since its lower resolutions, it tends to be cpu bottlenecked. Why not more eye candy? Especially with the way these cards perform, which would elimanate cpu bottlenecking and show where the strengths of the cards are, whether its using filters, or not. But like I said, very few reviews showed the lower resolutions, so its good to have them, just crank up that eye candy
  22. Bull Dog

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    146 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Well my 4870 idles at 80C and loads at 85C. Environment isn't particular cold either.
  23. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,635 (1.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Location:
    Tennessee
    That GX2 card isn't 420$, it's 538$.
  24. thoughtdisorder

    thoughtdisorder New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,818 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    269
    Location:
    Just South of Mars
    Excellent job ATI, and excellent review! Thanks W1zz!:)
  25. purecain

    purecain

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    609 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    158
    well the thing about reviews, is that we don't ever feel like we can completely trust the results...
    where as if wizard does one, its like one of our own testing the cards....

    good work m8....

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page