1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Do NVIDIA's CUDA and PhysX play a role in your buying decision?

Discussion in 'TPU Frontpage Polls' started by W1zzard, Mar 31, 2009.

?

Do NVIDIA's CUDA and PhysX play a role in your buying decision?

Poll closed Jul 15, 2009.
  1. Yes, both technologies are the ways of the future

    1,945 vote(s)
    18.6%
  2. Yes, I explicitly require CUDA and PhysX

    711 vote(s)
    6.8%
  3. No, my application and games don't require it

    1,999 vote(s)
    19.1%
  4. No, a graphics card is meant to accelerate 3D graphics only

    1,201 vote(s)
    11.5%
  5. I will wait for GPGPU to get more established (OpenCL / DX11)

    4,601 vote(s)
    44.0%
  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,871 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,596
    NVIDIA is full-cylinders when it comes to marketing two of its biggest technology initiatives since DirectX 10: CUDA and PhysX.

    The technology may be at its infancy, but props go to the company for propagating GPGPU to the common man.
    How do you look at the CUDA and PhysX incentive every current NVIDIA product carries, when in the market for a graphics card or motherboard?
    How has CUDA impacted your everyday application performance?
    Has PhysX revolutionized your gameplay?

    If you see a potential in these technologies, how would you expect us to cover the advancement of the technologies for you in our future reviews?

    Tell us more.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 31, 2009
  2. RuskiSnajper

    RuskiSnajper

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,608 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    231
    Location:
    slovenia , europe
    so many nvidia polls:p
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2009
  3. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    I like the idea behind CUDA. I mean a centralized physx engine. While I don't mind other physx engines this one by far has always been my favorite.
     
  4. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
    no it does not, I think nvidia's physx will flop in the end
     
  5. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,921 (6.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Does a dead GPGPU engine that Nvidia still flaunts as awesome effect my decisions? Nope.
     
  6. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,405 (4.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,459
    I agree, no wonder NV is trying to push it to consoles now
     
  7. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,546 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,644
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    I would really like to see the technology get bigger (more applications) than it is now, but then for it to grow, there should be more takers. CUDA unlocked the power of GPGPU to the grass-root consumer first, and other standards such as DXCS and OpenCL will be entering to cash in on the potential market CUDA created. Hence I look at it as an incentive.
     
  8. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,996 (7.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,543
    Where is the "ATI ROX YO SOX" option?
     
  9. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    There isn't so that people who don't wear socks aren't offended :)
     
  10. MidnightJam New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2008
    Messages:
    13 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    I vote no my application and games don`t require it.

    I mean right now, Multicore CPUs are gettin cheaper and cheaper and there will be 6 and 8 Core CPUs this year too.
    So why should i add an extra Card for Physik ... to rest my upcomming Quadcore?

    Physik (ex. Havok Engine) was always done by the CPU, and that extra Stuff on the screen ive seen in UT and Mirrors edge (with physiks) isnt very impressive.

    Im not vs advancement in PC Games, but its a very early stage of development.

    Have a nice day :)
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2009
  11. DaveK

    DaveK

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,889 (0.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    Nope it doesn't effect my buying decision what so ever, if there was an nVidia card of equal performance to an ATi card at the same price, I'd probably pick ATI, but I ignore CUDA and PhysX as my games run fine without it.
     
  12. crazy pyro

    crazy pyro New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,662 (0.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    125
    Location:
    Newcastle
    If the 9800GTX+ were at the same price point as my HD4850 was when I bought it in december I'd have gone for it, up to £10 more I'd have paid for the physx and CUDA stuff but I've seen the comparison of what physx does in mirror's edge and it's just a few rags attached to scaffolding, really not important.
    If it becomes more prominent/ is actually reqiured then fine but if it remains NVIDIA only then it won't be required by any software (at least nothing wanting to make a large amount of cash)
     
  13. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    If my board did both SLI and Crossfire, Physx and CUDA both would impact my decision. The GPU is way more powerful for physics calculations than a cpu. As it stands tho, to get the graphical power I wanted, ATI was the way to go. Physx and CUDA, while very nice, didn't hold enough sway for me to go with a single nv card over multiple ATI cards.
     
  14. skycrane

    skycrane Xtreme Refugee

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    26 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    i need the cuda to run gpugrid :)
     
  15. Hicks

    Hicks New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    92 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    QFT!
     
  16. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,206 (5.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,564
    Location:
    Florida
    i voted no its supposed to do only graphics. i mean thats why i have a physx card. everyone thinks their pointless and i personally get tired of it simply because i dont understand why everyone thinks that. sure its a ppu sure everything is going to grfx cards but in all honesty ageia is owned by nvidia driver support for the ppu isnt going away any time soon and in all honesty i dont know about you guys but i guess im a little weird in that i want my processor to process my GPU to render grafx and my ppu to process physx. like you guys dont want your quad to process physx or grfx i dont want my things processing things it isnt supposed to.
     
  17. Play3r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Messages:
    241 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Perth, Australia
    There Should be an option of the poll

    I Hate Nvidia ATI FOR LIFE!
     
  18. lism New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    138 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    The thing is a Quadcore based on X86 technology can never archieve the performance level of a GPU thats doing psysics for you. An X86 processor is menth for all day use of work, a videocard is just doing just one thing; rendering graphics. And therefore both Ati and Nvidia are pushing their possibilitys ahead of what their cards can do.

    Its not just gaming, it's also menth for developers who develop games. The Quaddro-series, or the FireGL from AMD. Both come with the same technique, and if nvidia is buying a company to integrate their technology into their GPU's they really need to market it.

    Otherwise, i dont see any difference in games and i dont need a videocard that is capable of doing psysx.
     
  19. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,175 (2.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    i think many specification in graphic card just for more sells , the new ATI 4xxx series make nvidia confused cuz nvidia sells are down , also im wait for dx11 and see what is the real improve which is make me got an nvidia card
     
  20. sLowEnd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    33 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    I've never used CUDA for anything.
    None of my game support PhysX either.

    I bought my 8800GT because it was dirt cheap on boxing day lol
     
  21. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,252 (2.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    963
    Strange set of overlapping, no-exclusive, and incomplete options.

    My answer: Dont care two hoots about PhysX gaming, but have chosen to switch from red to green due to CUDA and all the programming and application acceleration opportunities is brings.
     
  22. mike047 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    483 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    170
    Location:
    Zirconia NC usa
    I have bought Nvidia /CUDA for it's ability to run GpuGrid and potentially other BOINC projects.
     
  23. Ketxxx

    Ketxxx Heedless Psychic

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    11,510 (3.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    570
    Location:
    Kingdom of gods
    And with a resounding 46% of the vote.. "I will wait for GPGPU to get more established (OpenCL / DX11)" Wins!
     
  24. Johnytxtc

    Johnytxtc New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2009
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    China, Beijing
    I went with nvida after my x1950 cos ati seemed to be taking ages to bring out a dx10 at the time. Never looked back since

    I like the effects that you get with physx in mirrors egde & cryostasis. It does show off what can be done and of course things will change very much in the future. Weather it will flop or not is not an issue for me as I pretty much build a new pc every 12-18 months. I'm all about playing the the latest games with all they have to offer.
     
  25. Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,177 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    Why is there no boob physix? Imo they should make a dedicated algo instructions to it. Physix would sell like hot buns (pun not intended).
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page