1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

DRAM Makers Disappointed in Windows 8

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 29, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,974 (10.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,760
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Still reeling with over-production, swelling inventories, and spot-prices on free-fall, the DRAM industry had been banking on Microsoft's Windows 8 operating system launch to come to their salvation. Apparently, it didn't. As is customary with each new Windows launch, orders for DRAM components go up, as PC makers announce new products, and consumers purchase new RAM to upgrade their systems. Windows 8, which is essentially based on the same (albeit slightly tweaked) kernel as Windows 7, isn't really heavier on system resources. Let alone that, Windows 8 in itself is not expected to bring consumers to get a new PC, because Microsoft made it extremely simple and cheap to upgrade Windows 7 to 8. The industry's only real hope now is for hardware makers Intel, AMD, and ARM to introduce platforms that make use of DDR4 DRAM.

    [​IMG]

    Source: Tom's Hardware
     
  2. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,250 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    851
    Keep being disappointed if all you wish is us using heavier softwares for no reason
     
    STCNE says thanks.
  3. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    That is definitely their problem. Also, DDR4 won't solve their problem with over-production and swelling inventories for current DDR3.

    I am for one happy that the new Windows is streamlined and not bloated in any way, and does not need more RAM.
     
  4. avatar_raq

    avatar_raq

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    292 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    51
    Location:
    Iraq
    Please when will the HDD makers get disappointed too? I want HDDs prices to drop!
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2012
    remixedcat, xaira, [Ion] and 2 others say thanks.
  5. tacosRcool

    tacosRcool

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    861 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    71
    I want DDR4 RAM
     
  6. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    14,073 (5.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,438
    "WHEN LIFE GIVES YOU LEMONS...."

    When life gives you DRAMs - you make SSDs
     
    xaira says thanks.
  7. dzero

    dzero New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    somewhere over the hill
    So they are mad that you aren't forced to upgrade to ddr4 ram? Ha.
     
  8. RCoon

    RCoon Gaming Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    8,003 (8.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,121
    Location:
    Gypsyland, UK
    I dont see how it's M$ fault for NOT making Win 8 RAM heavy... lots of people are now running 8GB RAM with some power users on 16 and above, and that is barely even taken up with games, and when it comes to 3D creation, thats where VRAM comes in. Getting 16GB kits became cheap, so everybody got them. Even home users all went out and got themselves 8GB kits when ordering their home desktops. If their inventories are swelled with DDR3, I would have thought they would hold off on production, surely they must have seen it coming?
    As for DDR4, the only people they can complain about is MoBo manufacturers and developers for not including it. And I dare say the only people who will buy DDR4 immediately are the enthusiasts, and exactly how expensive is 16-32GB of DDR4 2133Mhz going to cost? It would probably be more cost effective to remain at DDR3 for the marginal increase in performance.
     
  9. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,563 (1.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    954
    Not like we need lots of ram anyways. I'm never going to use all 16 gbs I have. I'd say ram drives but outside of benchmarks they don't seem to be faster than a SSD in real world use.
     
  10. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    14,073 (5.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,438
    I believe this pic best expresses the frustration that DRAM makers are currently going through....

    [​IMG]

    WARNING: Pic does contain language that is unsuitable for minors - those with young kids, please cover their eyes or ask them to go play hide and seek (they hide, you seek) before looking at the pic
     
  11. SaltyFish

    SaltyFish

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    360 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    91
    DDR4 support isn't likely to be supported by processors until around 2015 since memory controllers are now built into the processor and those take longer to develop.

    My advice to RAM manufacturers... hardware RAM disk.
     
  12. 3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,875 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    689
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    Maybe DRAM manufacturers should be pushing RAMdisks then.
     
  13. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,843 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    670
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Honestly i think 6GB is the realistic cutoff. So 8GB will do just fine, I also wouldn't blame W8 DRAM makers need to realize most people that have a computer are not using it at 100% load all the time or even never. The only use for so much ram now is for big RAMdisk and servers...

    I personally have 4GB which was the normal back in 2008 and have never gone over 3.5GB.
    Though in my next build I'm going to have min. 16GB or 32GB, but if price is right than 64GB for RAMdisk.
     
  14. _JP_

    _JP_

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,684 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    740
    Location:
    Portugal
    Oh my.
    DRAM makers must furious with me, since I still use DDRII.
     
    xaira, Chevalr1c and Prima.Vera say thanks.
  15. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    14,073 (5.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,438
    you forgot to add....

    [​IMG]
     
    _JP_ says thanks.
  16. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,787 (3.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,399
    Location:
    Mexico
    I'll get 16GB of Vengeances. Would that appease the DRAM gods? :D
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. suraswami

    suraswami

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,253 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    837
    Location:
    Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
    so they don't to blame Apple?

    so somebody will always complain about M$, doesn't matter if they come out with a efficient product or sucky product :laugh:
     
    xaira says thanks.
  18. hellrazor

    hellrazor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,582 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    319
    I still use plain old DDR. I'd like to see the expressions on their faces.
     
    _JP_, WarEagleAU and Chevalr1c say thanks.
  19. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,802 (2.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,523
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    No kidding.
     
  20. largon

    largon

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,782 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    433
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    I'm itching to upgrade from my 4GBs of DDR2. Always running out of memory. Mmmm... How about a nice LGA2011 board with 8×8GB... ¦p~
    :D
    That clip is from a finnish skit show "Kummeli", skit's name is "Jankon Betoni" (part 1).
    Absolutely. Legendary. Finnish comedy.
    :rockout:
     
  21. p3ngwin1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    $150 for 3TB
    $90 for 2TB

    not cheap enough for ya ?
     
  22. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,808 (3.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Love that lol. Oh well boohoo. PRices are cheap and memory is always an easy upgrade. Sheesh greedy bums.
     
  23. Deadlyraver

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    279 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    I cannot believe that Windows 8 has been causing a lot of problems within the market's hardware industry. Because Windows 8 uses the same kernel as 7, it seems almost as relevant as upgrade Vista to 7 awhile back. Performance wise, really.
     
  24. p3ngwin1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Win8 is based on the same Kernel, but it is much improved, just as Win7's Kernel was based on Vista's, and Vista's Kernel based on XP's before it.

    Why do you think Win7 ran more efficiently compared to Vista on the same hardware? with the same thing happening with Win8, albeit to a lesser extent.
     
  25. Cortex

    Cortex New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    44 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    An OS shouldn't be too demanding in any way. We shall wait for super realistic Xbox next/PS4 ports, Adobe bloatware, 4k video, retina desktop displays that will run those videos...
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page